American Eagle value

Dave Sanders · 08-06-2009, 01:15 AM

I have a friend who is going to sell his AE, and I don't have one and am contemplating buying it. He rates the bluing at around 60%. He wants $1500 for it. My big question is if that is a fair price if all things are right with it. I know it is hard to say without seing pictures, but I am going to see it Friday. Thanks for any help you may give me.
Dave

Ron Wood · 08-06-2009, 02:21 AM

Is it a 1900 or a 1906? A lot has to do with the overall appearance of the gun and matching parts. It would be a pretty good deal for an all matching smooth 1900 with reasonable grips. If it is all pitted with bunged up grips or a bunch of mis-matched parts, then that is a lot to pay for a junker, either a 1900 or a 1906.

Dave Sanders · 08-06-2009, 07:45 PM

Thanks for the info. I'm not sure which model it is and I know more info is needed, but I was wondering about a good gun with that much bluing loss, if in great shape other than that, would it still be worth it more or less. I'll know which model tomorrow.
Dave

DavidJayUden · 08-06-2009, 09:48 PM

I'll go out on a limb and say that if the gun is a nice piece, matching, not pitted, etc. but with 40% bluing loss, $1500 is not bad. 1900 and 1906 models are simply worth more in this market. Hopefully, in 10 years you'll wish you'd have bought a truck load of them at that money.
DJU

Dave Sanders · 08-06-2009, 10:08 PM

I am reading up on them, but what parts should be numbered? Are they numbered like military or commercial?
Dave

Ron Wood · 08-06-2009, 10:34 PM

Commercial

Dave Sanders · 08-07-2009, 11:49 PM

Update on the AE. It was more like 40% bluing. The grips were original and numbered to gun, but really worn down. It was pretty sticky acting to **** it, etc. It was a 1900 model. I decided to wait for a better example. I think it might be wiser to spend a bit more and have something one won't have to apologize for each time he shows it.
Dave

JTD · 08-08-2009, 08:42 AM

Do you remember the ser# on it? John

DavidJayUden · 08-08-2009, 09:01 AM

Probably not a bad idea to go with your gut feelings on it. Unfortunately, my gut is stuck in "buy it" mode.
DJU

Lugerdoc · 08-08-2009, 09:11 AM

Some pertinent advise for life: when in doubt, don't. TH

Dave Sanders · 08-08-2009, 02:01 PM

John, I think it was 78XX ??-can't remember for sure, but I know it was 7000 series.
Dave

alvin · 08-08-2009, 02:14 PM

Have some pictures of the gun?

Dave Sanders · 08-08-2009, 02:20 PM

I don't have pictures. It was more like a dull nickel gun. The eagle was hard to see with no contrast.

alvin · 08-08-2009, 02:30 PM

Nickel gun? I think it's right to bypass this one. It's not easy to find an excellent 1900 -- I have never seen one in a dozen or so local stores that I scan regularly in a few years.

08-06-2009, 01:15 AM	#1
Dave Sanders User Join Date: Jun 2003 Location: Hamer, Idaho Posts: 273 Thanks: 19 Thanked 39 Times in 20 Posts	American Eagle value I have a friend who is going to sell his AE, and I don't have one and am contemplating buying it. He rates the bluing at around 60%. He wants $1500 for it. My big question is if that is a fair price if all things are right with it. I know it is hard to say without seing pictures, but I am going to see it Friday. Thanks for any help you may give me. Dave

08-06-2009, 02:21 AM	#2
Ron Wood Moderator 2010 LugerForum Patron Join Date: Jun 2002 Location: Santa Teresa New Mexico just outside of the West Texas town of El Paso Posts: 6,988 Thanks: 1,067 Thanked 5,099 Times in 1,676 Posts	Is it a 1900 or a 1906? A lot has to do with the overall appearance of the gun and matching parts. It would be a pretty good deal for an all matching smooth 1900 with reasonable grips. If it is all pitted with bunged up grips or a bunch of mis-matched parts, then that is a lot to pay for a junker, either a 1900 or a 1906. __________________ If it's made after 1918...it's a reproduction

08-06-2009, 10:34 PM	#6
Ron Wood Moderator 2010 LugerForum Patron Join Date: Jun 2002 Location: Santa Teresa New Mexico just outside of the West Texas town of El Paso Posts: 6,988 Thanks: 1,067 Thanked 5,099 Times in 1,676 Posts	Commercial __________________ If it's made after 1918...it's a reproduction

08-08-2009, 09:11 AM	#10
Lugerdoc Patron LugerForum Patron Join Date: Jun 2002 Location: POB 398 St.Charles,MO. 63302 Posts: 5,089 Thanks: 6 Thanked 736 Times in 483 Posts	Some pertinent advise for life: when in doubt, don't. TH __________________ Tom Heller POB 398 ST.Charles, MO. 63302 Tel 636-447-3006 lugerdoc@charter.net

08-06-2009, 07:45 PM	#3
Dave Sanders User Join Date: Jun 2003 Location: Hamer, Idaho Posts: 273 Thanks: 19 Thanked 39 Times in 20 Posts	Thanks for the info. I'm not sure which model it is and I know more info is needed, but I was wondering about a good gun with that much bluing loss, if in great shape other than that, would it still be worth it more or less. I'll know which model tomorrow. Dave

08-06-2009, 09:48 PM	#4
DavidJayUden Patron LugerForum Patron Join Date: Nov 2008 Posts: 4,047 Thanks: 578 Thanked 1,414 Times in 887 Posts	I'll go out on a limb and say that if the gun is a nice piece, matching, not pitted, etc. but with 40% bluing loss, $1500 is not bad. 1900 and 1906 models are simply worth more in this market. Hopefully, in 10 years you'll wish you'd have bought a truck load of them at that money. DJU

08-06-2009, 10:08 PM	#5
Dave Sanders User Join Date: Jun 2003 Location: Hamer, Idaho Posts: 273 Thanks: 19 Thanked 39 Times in 20 Posts	I am reading up on them, but what parts should be numbered? Are they numbered like military or commercial? Dave

08-07-2009, 11:49 PM	#7
Dave Sanders User Join Date: Jun 2003 Location: Hamer, Idaho Posts: 273 Thanks: 19 Thanked 39 Times in 20 Posts	Update on the AE. It was more like 40% bluing. The grips were original and numbered to gun, but really worn down. It was pretty sticky acting to **** it, etc. It was a 1900 model. I decided to wait for a better example. I think it might be wiser to spend a bit more and have something one won't have to apologize for each time he shows it. Dave

08-08-2009, 08:42 AM	#8
JTD User Join Date: Feb 2005 Location: PA Posts: 424 Thanks: 215 Thanked 407 Times in 148 Posts	Do you remember the ser# on it? John

08-08-2009, 09:01 AM	#9
DavidJayUden Patron LugerForum Patron Join Date: Nov 2008 Posts: 4,047 Thanks: 578 Thanked 1,414 Times in 887 Posts	Probably not a bad idea to go with your gut feelings on it. Unfortunately, my gut is stuck in "buy it" mode. DJU

08-08-2009, 02:01 PM	#11
Dave Sanders User Join Date: Jun 2003 Location: Hamer, Idaho Posts: 273 Thanks: 19 Thanked 39 Times in 20 Posts	John, I think it was 78XX ??-can't remember for sure, but I know it was 7000 series. Dave

08-08-2009, 02:14 PM	#12
alvin User Join Date: Jul 2007 Location: US Posts: 3,843 Thanks: 132 Thanked 729 Times in 438 Posts	Have some pictures of the gun?

08-08-2009, 02:20 PM	#13
Dave Sanders User Join Date: Jun 2003 Location: Hamer, Idaho Posts: 273 Thanks: 19 Thanked 39 Times in 20 Posts	I don't have pictures. It was more like a dull nickel gun. The eagle was hard to see with no contrast.

08-08-2009, 02:30 PM	#14
alvin User Join Date: Jul 2007 Location: US Posts: 3,843 Thanks: 132 Thanked 729 Times in 438 Posts	Nickel gun? I think it's right to bypass this one. It's not easy to find an excellent 1900 -- I have never seen one in a dozen or so local stores that I scan regularly in a few years.