upload photo | donate | calendar
|
my profile |
register |
faq |
search upload photo | donate | calendar |
09-10-2001, 03:05 AM
|
#21 |
|
RIP
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: South Side Virginia
Posts: 534
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
|
Re: Artilleries and Apologies !
Steve,
I would now be very cautious about any 7.65 mm Arty. All I see in The E-Book "DWM" is 9 mm, Now I Question that there were any Arty's in 7.65 mm. Were There? I'm not assuming on this matter any more! ViggoG................ viggogdereng@juno.com |
|
|
09-10-2001, 07:12 PM
|
#22 |
|
User
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Ohio
Posts: 200
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Re: Artilleries and Apologies !
The thing to keep in mind about the one that I saw is it was a mix of serial numbers and what looked like two or three different bluing proccesess. Who knows about the barrel. It could have been bored and sleaved for all I know. It was being sold as a mismatched, reblued shooter.
|
|
|
|
09-11-2001, 09:59 PM
|
#23 |
|
RIP
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: South Side Virginia
Posts: 534
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
|
Re: Artilleries and Apologies !
After comparing total manufactured in each calibre .
(Early 7.65 mm long barrels vs Arty. 9 mm) it could have been either but odds are 20 -1 That I assumed wrong . The 9 mm military wins by default as the 7.65 mm were all civil arms. ViggoG |
|
|
|
|
Linear Mode
