my profile |
register |
faq |
search upload photo | donate | calendar |
05-07-2013, 09:17 PM | #1 |
Lifer
Lifetime Forum Patron Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: South Louisiana
Posts: 979
Thanks: 1
Thanked 271 Times in 99 Posts
|
BUG proof
I have had the good fortune of owning a few 1906 American Eagle Lugers over the past several years, both 7.65mm and 9mm. It appears that proof marks on this model Luger varies from none, to a simple crown N and BUG proof. Is there a serial number range that either of the three possibilities fall into? In addition, are the BUG proofed '06 Lugers more desirable or worth more than the others? Any input will be appreciated.
Thanks, Mike |
05-07-2013, 09:25 PM | #2 |
Super Moderator
Eternal Lifer LugerForum Patron Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: North of Spokane, WA
Posts: 15,930
Thanks: 2,030
Thanked 4,527 Times in 2,090 Posts
|
Mike, did you look over the commercial listing that Dwight put together? It lists by serial number and proof markings as much as possible, which really gives you a feel when they did what markings.
http://forum.lugerforum.com/showthread.php?t=25436 . . .
__________________
Edward Tinker ************ Co-Author of Police Lugers - Co-Author of Simson Lugers Author of Veteran Bring Backs Vol I, Vol II, Vol III and Vol IV |
05-08-2013, 07:53 PM | #3 | |
User
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Portland, Oregon
Posts: 3,900
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1,313 Times in 430 Posts
|
Quote:
The no-proof guns are intermixed with c/BUG proofs until their reports peter out about sn 46672. The first report of a lazy c/N is sn 49074, and the last c/BUG report is sn 53514. Pistols are almost universally proofed once the lazy c/N appears. These details are interesting and meaningful to people like me who really care about commercial Lugers. Realistically they have little to no bearing on desirability or value. --Dwight |
|
The following member says Thank You to Dwight Gruber for your post: |
05-08-2013, 09:02 PM | #4 |
Super Moderator
Eternal Lifer LugerForum Patron Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: North of Spokane, WA
Posts: 15,930
Thanks: 2,030
Thanked 4,527 Times in 2,090 Posts
|
Dwight, no it isn't, at least I could read the posting AND download the pdf?
. . . NOTE: JUST THE FIRST PAGE |
The following member says Thank You to Edward Tinker for your post: |
05-08-2013, 10:49 PM | #5 |
Patron
LugerForum Patron Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Virginia
Posts: 127
Thanks: 166
Thanked 129 Times in 63 Posts
|
Ed:
I too could not access the hyperlink. When I tried, the message I received was "Invalid Thread Specified............please notify the administrator." I am using a MAC and not a DOS based computer. Don't know if that plays into not being able to view this thread?? Thanks for any help or suggestions. Ron |
05-09-2013, 08:17 AM | #6 |
User
Join Date: Nov 2011
Posts: 224
Thanks: 0
Thanked 81 Times in 41 Posts
|
Same here, can't get into the hyperlink.
This one works for me: http://forum.lugerforum.com/attachme...7&d=1314286635 About BUG vs. C/N, given a choice I prefer BUG, but condition/price ratio trump proofing. |
The following member says Thank You to CJS57 for your post: |
|
|