LugerForum Discussion Forums my profile | register | faq | search
upload photo | donate | calendar

Go Back   LugerForum Discussion Forums > General Discussion Forums > Repairs, Restoration & Refinishing

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Unread 12-28-2015, 10:03 PM   #1
sheepherder
Lifer
Lifetime Forum
Patron
 
sheepherder's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: ...on the 'ol Erie Canal...
Posts: 8,182
Thanks: 1,398
Thanked 4,440 Times in 2,328 Posts
Default

Aren't Luger carbines exempt from the ATF regulations about SBR's and detachable buttstocks???

Does anyone have the letter or the reg reference???
__________________
I like my coffee the
way I like my women...
...Cold and bitter...
sheepherder is offline  
The following member says Thank You to sheepherder for your post:
Unread 12-28-2015, 10:31 PM   #2
berkmberk1
User
 
berkmberk1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Springfield, IL
Posts: 49
Thanks: 0
Thanked 21 Times in 4 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by sheepherder View Post
Aren't Luger carbines exempt from the ATF regulations about SBR's and detachable buttstocks???

Does anyone have the letter or the reg reference???
From the ATF site -

OPEN LETTER ON THE
REDESIGN
OF STABILIZING BRACES”
The Firearms and Ammunition Technology Division (FATD), Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives (ATF) has received
inquiries from the public concerning the proper use of devices
recently marketed as stabilizing braces.” These devices are
described as “a shooter’s aid that is designed to improve the single
-handed shooting performance of buffer tube equipped
pistols.” The device claims to enhance a ccuracy and reduce felt recoil
when using an AR -style pistol. These items are intended to improve accuracy by using the operator’s forearm to provide stable support for
the AR - type pistol

. ATF has previously determined that attaching the brace to a
firearm does not alter the classification of the firearm or subject the firearm to National Firearms Act (NFA) control.
However, this classification is based upon the use of the device as designed.
When the device is redesigned for use as a shoulder stock on a handgun with a rifled barrel under 16 inches in length, the firearm
is properly classified as a firearm under the NFA.

By this it seems if it was ever originally made this way, its fine. If not i.e fitting a stock to a 1911, it would be "modified" and illegal without ATF approval.
__________________
Michael D. Berk
SFC, USA Ret.
berkmberk1 is offline  
Unread 12-28-2015, 11:17 PM   #3
sheepherder
Lifer
Lifetime Forum
Patron
 
sheepherder's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: ...on the 'ol Erie Canal...
Posts: 8,182
Thanks: 1,398
Thanked 4,440 Times in 2,328 Posts
Default

Section III pg 36 of the attached BATFE document specifically exempts Luger carbines from NFA status -
Attached Files
File Type: pdf p-5300-11-firearms-curios-or-relics-list.pdf (520.4 KB, 23 views)
__________________
I like my coffee the
way I like my women...
...Cold and bitter...
sheepherder is offline  
The following member says Thank You to sheepherder for your post:
Unread 12-29-2015, 09:09 AM   #4
DTR04
User
 
DTR04's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Texas
Posts: 51
Thanks: 90
Thanked 35 Times in 17 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by sheepherder View Post
Section III pg 36 of the attached BATFE document specifically exempts Luger carbines from NFA status -
I believe only original carbines are exempt. Recreations are not. This one is not even built on an original carbine frame. IMHO
DTR04 is offline  
The following 2 members says Thank You to DTR04 for your post:
Unread 12-29-2015, 09:48 AM   #5
John Sabato
Lifer
Lifetime Forum
Patron
 
John Sabato's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: The Capital of the Free World
Posts: 10,150
Thanks: 3,003
Thanked 2,304 Times in 1,096 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by DTR04 View Post
I believe only original carbines are exempt. Recreations are not. This one is not even built on an original carbine frame. IMHO
But being built with a 16" barrel makes this irrelevant... It does not meet the BATFE short barreled rifle (SBR) definition. No exemption from the National Firearms Act of 1934 is required.
__________________
regards, -John S

"...We hold these truths to be self-evident that ALL men are created EQUAL and are endowed by their Creator with certain UNALIENABLE rights, and among these are life, LIBERTY, and the pursuit of happiness..."
John Sabato is offline  
The following 5 members says Thank You to John Sabato for your post:
Unread 12-29-2015, 09:58 AM   #6
sheepherder
Lifer
Lifetime Forum
Patron
 
sheepherder's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: ...on the 'ol Erie Canal...
Posts: 8,182
Thanks: 1,398
Thanked 4,440 Times in 2,328 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by DTR04 View Post
I believe only original carbines are exempt. Recreations are not. This one is not even built on an original carbine frame. IMHO
Interesting...How do you tell an original carbine frame from say a 1917 Luger frame???

What about Luger carbines built in Germany back in the '20's by gunsmiths, from left-over or even discarded Great War pistols? Perhaps by a well-known gunsmith located in Vor See; are they exempt? Who says if they are or aren't 'original'???
__________________
I like my coffee the
way I like my women...
...Cold and bitter...
sheepherder is offline  
Closed Thread


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:22 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 1998 - 2024, Lugerforum.com