my profile |
register |
faq |
search upload photo | donate | calendar |
|
12-28-2015, 10:03 PM | #1 |
Lifer
Lifetime Forum Patron Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: ...on the 'ol Erie Canal...
Posts: 8,182
Thanks: 1,398
Thanked 4,440 Times in 2,328 Posts
|
Aren't Luger carbines exempt from the ATF regulations about SBR's and detachable buttstocks???
Does anyone have the letter or the reg reference???
__________________
I like my coffee the way I like my women... ...Cold and bitter... |
The following member says Thank You to sheepherder for your post: |
12-28-2015, 10:31 PM | #2 | |
User
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Springfield, IL
Posts: 49
Thanks: 0
Thanked 21 Times in 4 Posts
|
Quote:
OPEN LETTER ON THE REDESIGN OF STABILIZING BRACES” The Firearms and Ammunition Technology Division (FATD), Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives (ATF) has received inquiries from the public concerning the proper use of devices recently marketed as stabilizing braces.” These devices are described as “a shooter’s aid that is designed to improve the single -handed shooting performance of buffer tube equipped pistols.” The device claims to enhance a ccuracy and reduce felt recoil when using an AR -style pistol. These items are intended to improve accuracy by using the operator’s forearm to provide stable support for the AR - type pistol . ATF has previously determined that attaching the brace to a firearm does not alter the classification of the firearm or subject the firearm to National Firearms Act (NFA) control. However, this classification is based upon the use of the device as designed. When the device is redesigned for use as a shoulder stock on a handgun with a rifled barrel under 16 inches in length, the firearm is properly classified as a firearm under the NFA. By this it seems if it was ever originally made this way, its fine. If not i.e fitting a stock to a 1911, it would be "modified" and illegal without ATF approval.
__________________
Michael D. Berk SFC, USA Ret. |
|
12-28-2015, 11:17 PM | #3 |
Lifer
Lifetime Forum Patron Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: ...on the 'ol Erie Canal...
Posts: 8,182
Thanks: 1,398
Thanked 4,440 Times in 2,328 Posts
|
Section III pg 36 of the attached BATFE document specifically exempts Luger carbines from NFA status -
__________________
I like my coffee the way I like my women... ...Cold and bitter... |
The following member says Thank You to sheepherder for your post: |
12-29-2015, 09:09 AM | #4 |
User
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Texas
Posts: 51
Thanks: 90
Thanked 35 Times in 17 Posts
|
|
The following 2 members says Thank You to DTR04 for your post: |
12-29-2015, 09:48 AM | #5 |
Lifer
Lifetime Forum Patron Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: The Capital of the Free World
Posts: 10,150
Thanks: 3,003
Thanked 2,304 Times in 1,096 Posts
|
But being built with a 16" barrel makes this irrelevant... It does not meet the BATFE short barreled rifle (SBR) definition. No exemption from the National Firearms Act of 1934 is required.
__________________
regards, -John S "...We hold these truths to be self-evident that ALL men are created EQUAL and are endowed by their Creator with certain UNALIENABLE rights, and among these are life, LIBERTY, and the pursuit of happiness..." |
The following 5 members says Thank You to John Sabato for your post: |
12-29-2015, 09:58 AM | #6 | |
Lifer
Lifetime Forum Patron Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: ...on the 'ol Erie Canal...
Posts: 8,182
Thanks: 1,398
Thanked 4,440 Times in 2,328 Posts
|
Quote:
What about Luger carbines built in Germany back in the '20's by gunsmiths, from left-over or even discarded Great War pistols? Perhaps by a well-known gunsmith located in Vor See; are they exempt? Who says if they are or aren't 'original'???
__________________
I like my coffee the way I like my women... ...Cold and bitter... |
|
|
|