G-Date Waffenamt Marks - Page 3

Frank · 12-23-2003, 08:38 AM

Hi Steve, while the data you gave me might generally be correct (byf 41, S/N 4558r), it should have Waffenamt Marks of double SE/655. This thread, however, is basically for G-Dates, made in 1935. But thanks for the thought!!

ranvette · 01-10-2004, 09:54 PM

Here is Mine

G-Date-SN: 5690d
DE/63-S92-Eagle

Frank · 01-11-2004, 08:54 AM

Randy, welcome to the Luger Forum. I appreciate the data, thanks!!

Edward Tinker · 01-14-2004, 09:28 PM

POSTED FOR FRANK:
First of all, I want to thank all those who contributed to the G-Date Data. This graph presents the results of all the data I have been able to garner over the past several months. Reviewing the data ranges, it is obvious that some acceptance marks have openings in the data range. I have tried my best to estimate the data, but there are some areas that are open for discussion. I will try to keep any new data I can get from any source and if I can provide a more complete graph in the future, I will.

I obviously have the raw data that allowed me to make this graph. If anyone has the desire to review the raw data, please contact me and I'll be happy to provide the information!

<a href="http://forums.lugerforum.com/lfupload/g_data_waffenamt_ranges.jpg" target="_fullview"><img src="http://forums.lugerforum.com/lfupload/g_data_waffenamt_ranges.jpg" width="400" alt="Click for fullsize image" /></a>

Oliver · 01-15-2004, 11:27 AM

Hi Frank mine is s/42 G 8304E DE/63 DE/63.
Oliver

Frank · 01-15-2004, 03:23 PM

Oliver, thanks for the data!! While I have published the results of the study, I will continue to accumulate data.

John Sabato · 01-15-2004, 04:49 PM

Frank,

May I suggest that you open an album for this purpose in the Member Gallery and post your graph there... and whenever you update the data, you can replace the graphic to show the latest results...

MarkC · 02-01-2004, 05:13 PM

Serial numer 6943d
e/63, 92, e

I trust you will enjoy this presentation and the record of past American owners.

Frank · 02-01-2004, 05:58 PM

Mark, what a nice Luger. Also, nice paper trail - especially the William S. Ruger connection - WOW. I think you have a keeper and further it extends the upper range for that combination of marks. Thanks!!

Apfeltor · 04-01-2004, 09:42 PM

I just looked at mine.

G date S/42 7449c W154 S92 DE

Rob.

Frank · 04-02-2004, 09:58 AM

Hello Mr. Applegate!! Thanks for the data on your G-Date. It is most appreciated!

Thor · 06-16-2004, 06:36 PM

Frank, SN 4548d is stamped with DE/211 and S-92
<a href="http://members.rennlist.com/lugerman/4548d.JPG" target="_fullview"><img src="http://members.rennlist.com/lugerman/4548d.JPG" width="400" alt="Click for fullsize image" /></a>
<a href="http://members.rennlist.com/lugerman/DE211S92G.JPG" target="_fullview"><img src="http://members.rennlist.com/lugerman/DE211S92G.JPG" width="400" alt="Click for fullsize image" /></a>

Frank · 06-18-2004, 03:53 PM

Thor, thanks much for the data!! It is appreciated.

A.Mifsin · 09-17-2004, 01:31 AM

Hi Frank,
Here is my G date serial number 8735c ( it looks like c) E/154 and S92 matching mag with E/154
I hope this will help.

A.Mifsin · 09-17-2004, 05:23 AM

Hi Frank,
Here is my G date 8735c(it looks like a c)
W154 and S 92
Matching mag with E/154.
Hope this will help

Tomathvl · 09-17-2004, 05:56 AM

Frank,
My G date is 3514c and is W154 and S92.
Mag doesn't match. Fits right in your graph.
Tom

Frank · 09-17-2004, 09:50 AM

Alfred and Tom, thanks much for the data. Even though your pistols fall nicely into the graphical results, the data is useful in making estimates for extending the data into the "gray" areas.

mp44 · 10-21-2004, 08:45 PM

Here's a couple 3770a B90 S-91,and 1849c w154 s-92. Hope it helps.

Frank · 10-22-2004, 09:30 AM

Hi Danny, all data is most appreciated. The more data, the better the results. This is especially true for the range for each Waffenamt Mark.

drbuster · 10-23-2004, 09:55 AM

Hate to be late Frank, but mine is 9599 "d". DE63 DE63 DE. Also looking for a matching magazine.

01-14-2004, 09:28 PM	#44
Edward Tinker Super Moderator Eternal Lifer LugerForum Patron Join Date: Jun 2002 Location: North of Spokane, WA Posts: 15,909 Thanks: 1,986 Thanked 4,500 Times in 2,076 Posts	POSTED FOR FRANK: First of all, I want to thank all those who contributed to the G-Date Data. This graph presents the results of all the data I have been able to garner over the past several months. Reviewing the data ranges, it is obvious that some acceptance marks have openings in the data range. I have tried my best to estimate the data, but there are some areas that are open for discussion. I will try to keep any new data I can get from any source and if I can provide a more complete graph in the future, I will. I obviously have the raw data that allowed me to make this graph. If anyone has the desire to review the raw data, please contact me and I'll be happy to provide the information! <a href="http://forums.lugerforum.com/lfupload/g_data_waffenamt_ranges.jpg" target="_fullview"><img src="http://forums.lugerforum.com/lfupload/g_data_waffenamt_ranges.jpg" width="400" alt="Click for fullsize image" /></a> __________________ Edward Tinker ************ Co-Author of Police Lugers - Co-Author of Simson Lugers Author of Veteran Bring Backs Vol I, Vol II, Vol III and Vol IV

01-15-2004, 04:49 PM	#47
John Sabato Lifer Lifetime Forum Patron Join Date: Jun 2002 Location: The Capital of the Free World Posts: 10,150 Thanks: 3,003 Thanked 2,304 Times in 1,096 Posts	Frank, May I suggest that you open an album for this purpose in the Member Gallery and post your graph there... and whenever you update the data, you can replace the graphic to show the latest results... __________________ regards, -John S "...We hold these truths to be self-evident that ALL men are created EQUAL *and are endowed by their Creator* with certain UNALIENABLE* rights, and among these are life, LIBERTY, and the pursuit of happiness..."*

06-16-2004, 06:36 PM	#52
Thor User Join Date: Jun 2002 Location: Rio Rancho, New Mexico Posts: 4,583 Thanks: 958 Thanked 970 Times in 276 Posts	Frank, SN 4548d is stamped with DE/211 and S-92 <a href="http://members.rennlist.com/lugerman/4548d.JPG" target="_fullview"><img src="http://members.rennlist.com/lugerman/4548d.JPG" width="400" alt="Click for fullsize image" /></a> <a href="http://members.rennlist.com/lugerman/DE211S92G.JPG" target="_fullview"><img src="http://members.rennlist.com/lugerman/DE211S92G.JPG" width="400" alt="Click for fullsize image" /></a> __________________ Thor's Luger Clinic http://members.rennlist.com/lugerman/ Ted Green (Thor Yaller Boots) 725 Western Hills Dr SE, Rio Rancho, NM 87124 915-526-8925 Email thor340@aol.com ----------------------------------- John3:3 Jesus answered and said to him, "Most assuredly, I say to you, unless one is born again, he cannot see the kingdom of God."

09-17-2004, 01:31 AM	#54
A.Mifsin User Join Date: Dec 2002 Location: Malta Posts: 570 Thanks: 74 Thanked 12 Times in 12 Posts	Hi Frank, Here is my G date serial number 8735c ( it looks like c) E/154 and S92 matching mag with E/154 I hope this will help. __________________ I prefer a Luger

09-17-2004, 05:23 AM	#55
A.Mifsin User Join Date: Dec 2002 Location: Malta Posts: 570 Thanks: 74 Thanked 12 Times in 12 Posts	Hi Frank, Here is my G date 8735c(it looks like a c) W154 and S 92 Matching mag with E/154. Hope this will help __________________ I prefer a Luger

12-23-2003, 08:38 AM	#41
Frank RIP Patron LugerForum Patron Join Date: Jun 2002 Location: Hot & Dry PHX, AZ Posts: 2,078 Thanks: 24 Thanked 163 Times in 87 Posts	Hi Steve, while the data you gave me might generally be correct (byf 41, S/N 4558r), it should have Waffenamt Marks of double SE/655. This thread, however, is basically for G-Dates, made in 1935. But thanks for the thought!!

01-10-2004, 09:54 PM	#42
ranvette User Join Date: Jan 2004 Location: Hudson Mass Posts: 18 Thanks: 0 Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts	Here is Mine G-Date-SN: 5690d DE/63-S92-Eagle

01-11-2004, 08:54 AM	#43
Frank RIP Patron LugerForum Patron Join Date: Jun 2002 Location: Hot & Dry PHX, AZ Posts: 2,078 Thanks: 24 Thanked 163 Times in 87 Posts	Randy, welcome to the Luger Forum. I appreciate the data, thanks!!

01-15-2004, 11:27 AM	#45
Oliver New User Join Date: Sep 2003 Location: MS Posts: 2 Thanks: 0 Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts	Hi Frank mine is s/42 G 8304E DE/63 DE/63. Oliver

01-15-2004, 03:23 PM	#46
Frank RIP Patron LugerForum Patron Join Date: Jun 2002 Location: Hot & Dry PHX, AZ Posts: 2,078 Thanks: 24 Thanked 163 Times in 87 Posts	Oliver, thanks for the data!! While I have published the results of the study, I will continue to accumulate data.

02-01-2004, 05:13 PM	#48
MarkC User Join Date: Jun 2002 Location: Boston, MA Posts: 478 Thanks: 1 Thanked 109 Times in 26 Posts	Serial numer 6943d e/63, 92, e I trust you will enjoy this presentation and the record of past American owners.

02-01-2004, 05:58 PM	#49
Frank RIP Patron LugerForum Patron Join Date: Jun 2002 Location: Hot & Dry PHX, AZ Posts: 2,078 Thanks: 24 Thanked 163 Times in 87 Posts	Mark, what a nice Luger. Also, nice paper trail - especially the William S. Ruger connection - WOW. I think you have a keeper and further it extends the upper range for that combination of marks. Thanks!!

04-01-2004, 09:42 PM	#50
Apfeltor New User Join Date: Apr 2004 Location: Columbus Ohio Posts: 4 Thanks: 0 Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts	I just looked at mine. G date S/42 7449c W154 S92 DE Rob.

04-02-2004, 09:58 AM	#51
Frank RIP Patron LugerForum Patron Join Date: Jun 2002 Location: Hot & Dry PHX, AZ Posts: 2,078 Thanks: 24 Thanked 163 Times in 87 Posts	Hello Mr. Applegate!! Thanks for the data on your G-Date. It is most appreciated!

06-18-2004, 03:53 PM	#53
Frank RIP Patron LugerForum Patron Join Date: Jun 2002 Location: Hot & Dry PHX, AZ Posts: 2,078 Thanks: 24 Thanked 163 Times in 87 Posts	Thor, thanks much for the data!! It is appreciated.

09-17-2004, 05:56 AM	#56
Tomathvl User Join Date: May 2004 Location: Milan, IN Posts: 363 Thanks: 3 Thanked 48 Times in 19 Posts	Frank, My G date is 3514c and is W154 and S92. Mag doesn't match. Fits right in your graph. Tom

09-17-2004, 09:50 AM	#57
Frank RIP Patron LugerForum Patron Join Date: Jun 2002 Location: Hot & Dry PHX, AZ Posts: 2,078 Thanks: 24 Thanked 163 Times in 87 Posts	Alfred and Tom, thanks much for the data. Even though your pistols fall nicely into the graphical results, the data is useful in making estimates for extending the data into the "gray" areas.

10-21-2004, 08:45 PM	#58
mp44 User Join Date: Sep 2004 Location: usa Posts: 15 Thanks: 0 Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts	Here's a couple 3770a B90 S-91,and 1849c w154 s-92. Hope it helps.

10-22-2004, 09:30 AM	#59
Frank RIP Patron LugerForum Patron Join Date: Jun 2002 Location: Hot & Dry PHX, AZ Posts: 2,078 Thanks: 24 Thanked 163 Times in 87 Posts	Hi Danny, all data is most appreciated. The more data, the better the results. This is especially true for the range for each Waffenamt Mark.

10-23-2004, 09:55 AM	#60
drbuster User Join Date: Jun 2002 Location: San Mateo, California Posts: 1,432 Thanks: 2 Thanked 71 Times in 56 Posts	Hate to be late Frank, but mine is 9599 "d". DE63 DE63 DE. Also looking for a matching magazine.