my profile |
register |
faq |
search upload photo | donate | calendar |
08-31-2010, 05:54 PM | #1 |
User
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: PA, USA
Posts: 9
Thanks: 3
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
early german luger, looking for info
I have a German Luger that has been passed down in my family since my great great grandfather. It is a 9mm, 6" barrel, reverse safety and also has the grip safety. 100 & 200 range site. You can put a stock on this gun(don't have one though). It is missing the front site piece. It is stamped(scrolled) DWM, the serial # is 3608. All numbers are matching with the exception of the clip(#'ed 3331). Underside of the barrel has a crown symbol and the letter "M"(i was told is a navy issue??), with ser. 3608 under that. 08 is stamped in 3 visible places on the gun. There are no other markings, #'s, or stamps on this gun. I took this to a gun appraiser(not a luger appraiser), he couldn't give me any info on the value of this gun. All he could tell me is he thinks the year is 1904 and the bluing is about 95% and it's in excellent condition. What I would like to know is an estimated value of this gun....the year and model....and any other info would be greatly appreciated. Thanks so much for taking the time to read this.
|
08-31-2010, 06:03 PM | #2 |
Lifer
Lifetime Forum Patron Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: ...on the 'ol Erie Canal...
Posts: 8,182
Thanks: 1,400
Thanked 4,442 Times in 2,330 Posts
|
Yup, you got a Navy Luger. Tom Heller should have a front sight blade for you [lugerdoc on this site].
Excellent start to a collection!
__________________
I like my coffee the way I like my women... ...Cold and bitter... |
08-31-2010, 06:43 PM | #3 |
User
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Irmo, SC
Posts: 625
Thanks: 35
Thanked 168 Times in 107 Posts
|
gee...
some people have all the luck! I wouldn't be surprised if Angelina Jolie shows up later at your house in a nightie with a bottle of good wine!
|
08-31-2010, 09:48 PM | #4 |
Patron
LugerForum Patron Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Colorado
Posts: 978
Thanks: 68
Thanked 127 Times in 108 Posts
|
WOW! Beautiful! I think a 1906 first issue. But wait for the real Navy experts to show up.
Whaaaat? When she showed up here, I had to supply the wine,,, FN |
08-31-2010, 10:43 PM | #5 |
Always A
Lifetime Forum Patron Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Colorado
Posts: 2,417
Thanks: 226
Thanked 2,603 Times in 933 Posts
|
Hi Randy, Welcome to the forum. You have a 1906 Navy 1st issue with the safety in the original, unaltered, configuration. This is a rare and very desirable variation, and yours appears to be in extraordinary condition. However there are two areas of concern. Firstly, your gun appears to be missing the Naval proofs and acceptance marks on the left barrel, receiver and breechblock (see photo). Secondly, I see no sign of barrel serial number halos. I hope that this is just the photos you provided. Perhaps you could post clear photos of the left side of the gun, and a close up of the barrel serial. Regards, Norm
|
09-01-2010, 12:30 AM | #6 |
User
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: PA, USA
Posts: 9
Thanks: 3
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
NORME: Thanks alot for the reply. There are no other markings on this gun, other then whats stated and pictured. Picture 7 shows the markings on the barrel. If you click on the picture and then click on it again after it opens it will show you a full photo. Also helps if you zoom in the % on the page. Not sure if you knew that, just thought I would suggest it. The lack of markings is what has me stumped on what this gun is. I was told that some of the earlier guns didn't have a lot of the stamps. Could that be true?
Thanks again for all your help. |
09-01-2010, 02:47 AM | #7 |
Super Moderator
Eternal Lifer LugerForum Patron Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: North of Spokane, WA
Posts: 15,928
Thanks: 2,028
Thanked 4,525 Times in 2,090 Posts
|
I would say it is either a refurbished and sold in Canada (no germany stamps that I could see) from the 1920's/1930's
Or a very nice reblue (a restore would have the markings reapplied if possible). See how faint the crown M on the bottom of the barrel looks. And no, the chance of it leaving the factory without being accepted and proofed is as remote as Norme seeing Angelena (sp) show up. My goodness you live in colorado, and she lives in utah or something, she'd have to make an appointment with you? Ed
__________________
Edward Tinker ************ Co-Author of Police Lugers - Co-Author of Simson Lugers Author of Veteran Bring Backs Vol I, Vol II, Vol III and Vol IV |
09-01-2010, 07:28 AM | #8 |
User
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Irmo, SC
Posts: 625
Thanks: 35
Thanked 168 Times in 107 Posts
|
is it possible the original barrel extension was damaged and replaced, and the original barrel reblued and installed on it?
|
09-01-2010, 09:01 AM | #9 |
Patron
LugerForum Patron Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: POB 398 St.Charles,MO. 63302
Posts: 5,089
Thanks: 6
Thanked 736 Times in 483 Posts
|
I agree with the above that this pistol doesn't have the Navy acceptance marking, but without inspecting it, I would not rule out it being a 1920s Navy type commerical (see "Lugers at Random" page 182) using up leftover 1st issue M1906 parts. Years ago I had a long frame standard sight, non-grip safety type commerical with a crown/M marked (on bottom) barrel, that was made from old parts at DWM in the 20s. TH PS: I do have some NOS front sight blades available.
|
09-01-2010, 11:22 AM | #10 |
User
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Ohio
Posts: 106
Thanks: 0
Thanked 11 Times in 7 Posts
|
Norm.... Based on the thread going on over on Jan's Forum, I would think we would not expect to see halo on this early of a gun. Am I missing something ??
__________________
dave |
09-01-2010, 11:55 AM | #11 |
Always A
Lifetime Forum Patron Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Colorado
Posts: 2,417
Thanks: 226
Thanked 2,603 Times in 933 Posts
|
Hi Dave, If, as Tom has suggested, this gun is a post war Commercial Navy, I would expect to see halos. I also understand that most (but not all) Commercial Navies, were built on the later 1914 frame, had five digit serials, and were "Germany" marked. Regards, Norm
|
The following member says Thank You to Norme for your post: |
09-01-2010, 12:22 PM | #12 |
Moderator
2010 LugerForum Patron Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Santa Teresa New Mexico just outside of the West Texas town of El Paso
Posts: 7,019
Thanks: 1,090
Thanked 5,169 Times in 1,701 Posts
|
A 1920 Commercial is probably a reasonable guess. All bets are off on 1920 Commercials, particularly those non-standard (i.e. navys, LP08s, carbines) that were assembled from parts...they are all over the place. Wouldn't be marked Germany if it was for European sales. This is a neat gun, whatever it is.
__________________
If it's made after 1918...it's a reproduction |
09-01-2010, 12:48 PM | #13 |
User
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: PA, USA
Posts: 9
Thanks: 3
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Hi thanks for all the great replies but if it was a 1920 commercial why are all the parts stamped with 08 that coincide with the serial # even on the inside of the grips and no other numbers. This thing has me baffled. I have been looking everywhere for info. Again thanks so much for everyone's replies and great info.
|
09-01-2010, 02:34 PM | #14 |
Moderator
2010 LugerForum Patron Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Santa Teresa New Mexico just outside of the West Texas town of El Paso
Posts: 7,019
Thanks: 1,090
Thanked 5,169 Times in 1,701 Posts
|
Small parts and grips should be numbered with the last two digits, commercials included. What other numbers are you looking for?
__________________
If it's made after 1918...it's a reproduction |
The following member says Thank You to Ron Wood for your post: |
09-01-2010, 04:03 PM | #15 |
User
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Ohio
Posts: 106
Thanks: 0
Thanked 11 Times in 7 Posts
|
Norm... I guess my thoughts were that if it was an original Ist Issue that perhaps just lost it's Navy acceptance stamps in the 1920 period then it wouldn't have had a halo since the get go...
Ron's comments about 1920 are well taken. Like Tom, I have what I've considered a 1920 6 inch Navy with navy rear sight and a C/M stamp on the bottom of the barrel. Serial number is 7757. No grip safety. Stamped MADE IN GERMANY. Interesting period.....
__________________
dave |
09-01-2010, 05:39 PM | #16 |
User
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: PA, USA
Posts: 9
Thanks: 3
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Ron: Sorry, what I meant was if this was put together with spare pieces/parts would all the numbers still match? Including the small and interior parts? Also, I was under the impression that they removed the grip safety in 1908. As with the reverse safety lock earlier then that. Is my information wrong?
Thanks again for all the help. |
09-02-2010, 10:04 AM | #17 |
Patron
LugerForum Patron Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: POB 398 St.Charles,MO. 63302
Posts: 5,089
Thanks: 6
Thanked 736 Times in 483 Posts
|
SD, Prior to it's take over by Mauser in 1930, DWM was using up its left over unnumbered spare parts to built up all sorts of variations for commerical sale --- they needed the money. Mauser even continued to make some grip safety lugers for contract sales to the Swiss, Portugese (GNR), etc. TH
|
The following member says Thank You to Lugerdoc for your post: |
09-03-2010, 12:07 AM | #18 |
User
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: CA, USA
Posts: 62
Thanks: 4
Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
|
In the second photo, isn't the hole at the top of the stock lug indicative of a Mauser frame?
__________________
I'm looking for a D suffix DE154 G Date mag. The closer to #457d the better PM me if you have one you are willing to sell, trade, or if you have a lead |
09-03-2010, 02:07 AM | #19 |
User
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Box 240188, Douglas, Alaska, 99824
Posts: 463
Thanks: 0
Thanked 52 Times in 32 Posts
|
Eric
Unusual, in that it has a long frame and what appears to be a Mauser stock lug! |
09-03-2010, 02:28 PM | #20 |
User
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Portland, Oregon
Posts: 3,900
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1,310 Times in 429 Posts
|
Metal has been removed from the barrel serial number area, and a number restamped. The absence of any proof marks on the gun suggests that it was not created in Germany.
--Dwight |
|
|