LugerForum Discussion Forums my profile | register | faq | search
upload photo | donate | calendar

Go Back   LugerForum Discussion Forums > Luger Discussion Forums > Commercial Lugers

Reply
Thread Tools Display Modes
Unread 12-08-2010, 10:08 PM   #21
adlerauger
User
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Santa Clarita, California
Posts: 50
Thanks: 8
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

Gentlemen:
In reading the above posts, it seems to appear the majority of commercial Lugers were stamped "Germany". I have a DWM, serial #9805-K", which I'm told is a production year of 1922. It has no "Germany" stamp anywhere. How unusual is that? I mean, were most, or only some marked that way?
As a side note, being new to the Luger addiction, I believe even Sherlock Holmes would have had his hands full trying to track down all of the clues about Luger's many variants and anomalies.
Best Regards,
Adler Auger
adlerauger is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 12-09-2010, 01:58 AM   #22
MFC
User
 
MFC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Louisiana
Posts: 1,237
Thanks: 183
Thanked 281 Times in 162 Posts
Default

Elementary Watson... The Luger was originally sold in Europe and is probably a bring back.
__________________
Mike C.
MFC is offline   Reply With Quote
The following member says Thank You to MFC for your post:
Unread 12-09-2010, 06:22 AM   #23
alanint
User
 
alanint's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Marco Island, Florida
Posts: 4,867
Thanks: 1,685
Thanked 1,916 Times in 1,192 Posts
Default

Adler,

Only commertial Lugers destined to be sold in the US have a "Germany" stamped on them. Our regs, not theirs.
I am not aware of any other country that required the country of manufacturing origen to be stamped on firearms being imported.
alanint is offline   Reply With Quote
The following member says Thank You to alanint for your post:
Unread 12-09-2010, 06:29 PM   #24
adlerauger
User
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Santa Clarita, California
Posts: 50
Thanks: 8
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

Gentlemen:
As always, appreciate the reply and the information.
If I may push the "question" envelope one more time. I've searched the site looking for the subject of numbered vs non-numbered side plates and I'm still not clear on the issue.
My DWM, #9805-K has all matching parts except magazine and side plate. I've scoured the side plate and there are no marks, numbers, symbols, etc. It's my understanding (however fuzzy) that commercial Lugers should have a numbered side plate; Ja, Nein??
I await the verdict.
Best Regards,
Adler Auger aka Dale
adlerauger is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 12-09-2010, 06:53 PM   #25
lugerholsterrepair
Moderator
Lifetime Forum
Patron
 
lugerholsterrepair's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Arizona/Colorado
Posts: 7,761
Thanks: 4,855
Thanked 3,101 Times in 1,427 Posts
Default

Dale, Yes..Commercial Lugers will have the sideplate number on the underside ledge.

Jerry Burney
__________________
Jerry Burney
11491 S. Guadalupe Drive

Yuma AZ 85367-6182


lugerholsterrepair@earthlink.net

928 342-7583 (CO & AZ) Year Round
719 207-3331 (cell)


"For those who Fight For It, Life has a flavor the protected will never know."
lugerholsterrepair is offline   Reply With Quote
The following member says Thank You to lugerholsterrepair for your post:
Unread 12-09-2010, 10:42 PM   #26
adlerauger
User
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Santa Clarita, California
Posts: 50
Thanks: 8
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

Thanks Jerry:
I'll keep my eyes peeled for side plate #05 in that case. And even if I don't find one, it's still a great little shooter.
Best Regards,
Dale
adlerauger is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 12-10-2010, 05:41 AM   #27
dharger
User
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 17
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

I wonder about the side plate numbering myself. I have a commercial Luger in 7.65 without a numbered sideplate. I'm about 99% sure its never been refinished and the sideplate looks like its been on it since the day it left the factory.
dharger is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 12-10-2010, 09:22 AM   #28
MFC
User
 
MFC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Louisiana
Posts: 1,237
Thanks: 183
Thanked 281 Times in 162 Posts
Default

David,
It is possible, but unlikely, that it left the factory without a number. The number should be there, so it will always be considered mismatched, even if it was a factory mistake/oversight.
__________________
Mike C.
MFC is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 12-10-2010, 10:10 AM   #29
DavidJayUden
Patron
LugerForum
Patron
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 4,047
Thanks: 578
Thanked 1,414 Times in 887 Posts
Default

Definitely no number along the lower edge?
DavidJayUden is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 12-11-2010, 08:15 AM   #30
dharger
User
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 17
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by MFC View Post
David,
It is possible, but unlikely, that it left the factory without a number. The number should be there, so it will always be considered mismatched, even if it was a factory mistake/oversight.
I agree that it will always be viewed as mismatched and it is too bad in this guns case. I just have a feeling that it left the factory this way.I was lucky enough to pick it up on the cheap (guy just didn't want it)so no harm done on the wallet. I even looked under magnification for a sign of a number but there is none. I don't get the chance to shoot much anymore, but if I do, it should make one heck of a shooter.
dharger is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 12-11-2010, 04:25 PM   #31
Dwight Gruber
User
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Portland, Oregon
Posts: 3,890
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1,282 Times in 424 Posts
Default

Great Britain had (has) a counry-of-origin import identification requirement, but I'm not sure how that applies to firearms. Britain does have a national proof law, and foreign weapons include "Not English Made" in the proof suite.

--Dwight
Dwight Gruber is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 12-20-2010, 09:25 PM   #32
dalep38
Lifer
Lifetime Forum
Patron
 
dalep38's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Southeast USA
Posts: 60
Thanks: 5
Thanked 3 Times in 2 Posts
Default

Dwight and others: Here is the stamp "not english made" that was referred to. So far as halo , no halo You can be the judge. Its from a byf 43 P.38. I hope you can see it clear enough, my picture skills are lacking a bit. ..Thank You, Dale
Attached Thumbnails
Click image for larger version

Name:	byf 43 not english made stamp.jpg
Views:	10
Size:	140.4 KB
ID:	16277  

Click image for larger version

Name:	byf 43 not english made 2.jpg
Views:	10
Size:	101.8 KB
ID:	16278  

__________________
Always looking for early P.38's Original finish collector grade ,Zeros,480,ac only,40 added,ac40,ac41's and mags
dalep38 is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 12-27-2010, 10:50 AM   #33
Lugerdoc
Patron
LugerForum
Patron
 
Lugerdoc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: POB 398 St.Charles,MO. 63302
Posts: 5,089
Thanks: 6
Thanked 736 Times in 483 Posts
Default

Dale, Nice clear photo. It's my recollection that most "tommy" bring back firearms never were registered, although to have them LEGALY registered, the proof house inspection and markings were required. TH
__________________
Tom Heller POB 398 ST.Charles, MO. 63302
Tel 636-447-3006 lugerdoc@charter.net
Lugerdoc is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:02 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 1998 - 2024, Lugerforum.com