my profile |
register |
faq |
search upload photo | donate | calendar |
07-17-2016, 08:31 PM | #1 |
User
Join Date: Jun 2016
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 22
Thanks: 2
Thanked 4 Times in 3 Posts
|
42 Mauser Chamber Dated 1939
I picked up this Luger at a local gun store. I checked one of my Luger books on the proofs it should have and they differed. My book was showing two inspection proofs with the number 655 and the military eagle. My gun has two proofs with number 63 and the military eagle. Wondering why the difference.
|
07-17-2016, 11:04 PM | #2 |
Super Moderator
Eternal Lifer LugerForum Patron Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: North of Spokane, WA
Posts: 15,927
Thanks: 2,026
Thanked 4,525 Times in 2,090 Posts
|
serial number and suffix?
Jan Still's website shows 1939's with eagle 63 - eagle 83 and eagle 655 depending on when accepted. My 1939 police has two eagle 63's
__________________
Edward Tinker ************ Co-Author of Police Lugers - Co-Author of Simson Lugers Author of Veteran Bring Backs Vol I, Vol II, Vol III and Vol IV |
07-17-2016, 11:09 PM | #3 |
User
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Murphy, TX (near Dallas)
Posts: 38
Thanks: 16
Thanked 46 Times in 16 Posts
|
Don R. Hallock & Joop van de Kant's book on "The Mauser Parabellum 1930-1946 states that there were several acceptance marks found on the 1939-42 LP.08. "Between this serial number (2611w) and 5579w, the Luger collector can find all three acceptance mark variations: SE(stick eagle)-63L(large) SE-63L, SE-63 SE-655, and SE-655 SE-655."
They also noted that there was also an inspector using the SE-83 in late 1937, all of 1938 and well into the 1939 production. Additionally they noted, in the 1939 q and r blocks there was a variation in size of the SE-63 inspector's mark. "It is not unusual to observe a medium size 63 located next to a larger 63 on the same receiver." (page 189 of the above cited book). That's a quick answer to your question. I'm sure members more knowledgeable than myself (that's just about everybody on this board - I'm still lurkin' and learnin') can give you much more information on the 9 known 1939-42 collectors variations shown on page 195 of the above cited book, but they will need more and better pictures including the serial number with suffix. Take your pictures of top and all sides including close-up shots of the markings in natural lighting without a flash. (Note that in your picture the acceptance marks that you are asking about are almost unreadable due to flash "whiteout") Be certain to get the suffix as well as serial number found under the barrel (if present, some will have no suffix). Hope this quick answer helps until more knowledgeable folks can respond. Doug PS. Sorry Ed. Your response apparently came in while I was still typing. Last edited by Desperado; 07-17-2016 at 11:13 PM. Reason: Typing too slow.... |
07-18-2016, 03:59 AM | #4 |
User
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Somewhere in Northern Italy
Posts: 2,646
Thanks: 1,082
Thanked 1,783 Times in 1,007 Posts
|
johnb55
To me your Luger seems absolutely correct, but I double checked "my Bible" Jan Still's book "Third Reich Lugers" (page 65) and I would confirm it. I think would interesting to see some close up photos taken in natural light in the shade or better still on a cloudy day (always without a flash).
__________________
"Originality can't be restored and should be at the top of any collector's priority list. |
07-18-2016, 05:18 PM | #5 |
User
Join Date: Jun 2016
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 22
Thanks: 2
Thanked 4 Times in 3 Posts
|
Hi Ed
The pistol is 9817 r I like to thank everyone who posted information. What this has shown me is a need for a more detailed reference. The book I was looking at is called Luger Variations by Harry E. Jones. The grips are matching but one has one number double striked on one grip. Seems like one can always find something on these old guns. I will post pics of it tomorrow for opinion. Mag is # 6726 k + waf over 63 Black mag alum bottom Will also take pics of pistol tomorrow for all |
07-18-2016, 07:17 PM | #6 |
User
Join Date: Apr 2016
Location: Newburgh,IN
Posts: 788
Thanks: 391
Thanked 630 Times in 333 Posts
|
Johnb55, I have a1939 Mauser "42" serial 9742 t with two "63" military stamps. Welcome to the club.
__________________
“God created war so that Americans would learn geography.” ― Mark Twain |
07-18-2016, 07:21 PM | #7 |
Super Moderator - Patron
LugerForum Life Patron Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Eastern North Carolina, USA
Posts: 3,907
Thanks: 1,374
Thanked 3,108 Times in 1,509 Posts
|
I've got one made a couple of thousand prior to yours, and it is also E/63 inspected.
I like the plum color to the finish on yours. Mauser must have been having problems with salt bluing consistency in this timeframe (probably rushing things as the result of ramping up war production in the timeframe of the Poland invasion). My 1939 7xxxr block gun has an almost translucent blued finish. Congratulations on a nice one... Marc
__________________
Igitur si vis pacem, para bellum - - Therefore if you want peace, prepare for war. |
07-19-2016, 10:25 AM | #8 | |
Lifer
Lifetime Forum Patron Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: The Capital of the Free World
Posts: 10,153
Thanks: 3,003
Thanked 2,304 Times in 1,096 Posts
|
Quote:
But for the best and latest information, there are many recent publications with the most current information available today. Many were authored by historians that are members of this and Jan Still's forum.
__________________
regards, -John S "...We hold these truths to be self-evident that ALL men are created EQUAL and are endowed by their Creator with certain UNALIENABLE rights, and among these are life, LIBERTY, and the pursuit of happiness..." |
|
07-25-2016, 02:29 PM | #9 |
User
Join Date: Jun 2016
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 22
Thanks: 2
Thanked 4 Times in 3 Posts
|
Finally getting around to posting some pics of the grips. One looks good, ones looks messed with. Has anyone seen grips double stamped originally or just a poor attempt to make them match. More pics of pistol to follow.
|
07-25-2016, 05:00 PM | #10 |
User
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: near Charlotte NC
Posts: 4,681
Thanks: 1,441
Thanked 4,350 Times in 2,040 Posts
|
Looks "messed with" to me too.
__________________
03man(Don Voigt); Luger student and collector. Looking for DWM side plate: 69 ; Dreyse 1907 pistol K.S. Gendarmerie |
07-26-2016, 03:28 PM | #11 |
User
Join Date: Jun 2016
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 22
Thanks: 2
Thanked 4 Times in 3 Posts
|
A couple of more pics for everyone to look over. Everything looks matching on this pistol, except for one grip and mag. I have a question for Mrerick. I see you also have a 1939 42. I posted a pic of the barrel sn and gauge (8.88). Do you see anything abnormal with my number when comparing it to your 1939. This pistols 8.88 is very close to barrel sn. Any feedback greatly appreciated. John
Last edited by johnb55; 07-27-2016 at 06:15 AM. |
The following member says Thank You to johnb55 for your post: |
08-02-2016, 05:26 PM | #12 |
User
Join Date: Jun 2016
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 22
Thanks: 2
Thanked 4 Times in 3 Posts
|
Update on this lugers performance. I got to the range today and fired a couple of clips to see if any issues. Pistol worked fine, cycled with no problems.
I have a question for Eugen. I see that you have a 1939 like mine. I have been looking at this guns barrel numbers. Looking for a verdict if mine is kosher from board. 8.83 very close to serial number. Thanks John |
08-02-2016, 06:16 PM | #13 | |
User
Join Date: Apr 2016
Location: Newburgh,IN
Posts: 788
Thanks: 391
Thanked 630 Times in 333 Posts
|
Quote:
That 8.83 is a barrel measurement performed by Mauser and not associated with the serial number. You can read more about it in the FAQS or one of the more knowledgeable members may provide more specific details. It looks legit to me, but I am new at this.
__________________
“God created war so that Americans would learn geography.” ― Mark Twain |
|
08-02-2016, 10:00 PM | #14 |
User
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Murphy, TX (near Dallas)
Posts: 38
Thanks: 16
Thanked 46 Times in 16 Posts
|
I think he is saying that he is concerned about the serial number being stamped where it is almost touching the bore numbers and is asking if this is "normal" for 1939's to be this close together - or was this a barrel that was stamped later and not too carefully by someone building up a luger.
|
08-03-2016, 07:14 AM | #15 |
User
Join Date: Jun 2016
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 22
Thanks: 2
Thanked 4 Times in 3 Posts
|
Eugen, yes very happy that everything went well. My question to the board is how do the barrel serial number and caliber measurement look in regards to being correct and original. Numbers look blued which is good, my concern is they look a little small.
|
08-03-2016, 09:45 AM | #16 |
User
Join Date: Apr 2016
Location: Newburgh,IN
Posts: 788
Thanks: 391
Thanked 630 Times in 333 Posts
|
John, sorry I misread your question. The best answer I can provide might be photos of mine. Your two stampings are indeed closer than mine. Does the close proximity on yours indicate shenanigans or did Fritz at Mauser just like to keep things close? I'll defer to more experienced members on that question. Hopefully they will jump in with their opinions.
__________________
“God created war so that Americans would learn geography.” ― Mark Twain |
08-03-2016, 10:09 AM | #17 |
User
Join Date: Jun 2016
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 22
Thanks: 2
Thanked 4 Times in 3 Posts
|
Eugene, thanks for the pictures of your barrel numbers. Our guns are 75 serial numbers apart. Comparing the 9s and 7s on both pistols they look the same. I really don't see any difference in font or size. Looks like my numbers are legit. Any members care to add any thoughts. Moving on to next Luger.
|
05-07-2017, 06:07 PM | #18 |
User
Join Date: Jun 2016
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 22
Thanks: 2
Thanked 4 Times in 3 Posts
|
P08 Well Marks
Hi Eugene, I have a question for you if you still have your code 42, 1939. Since your Luger is close to mine in serial #. the stamping marks in the frame well could be similar or the same. Attaching a pic of mine. Thanks John
|
05-07-2017, 10:07 PM | #19 |
User
Join Date: Nov 2014
Posts: 544
Thanks: 194
Thanked 489 Times in 251 Posts
|
The letter suffix is part of the serial number; with about 10,000 guns in each letter series your pistol is roughly 20,000 away from Eugene's.
Last edited by 4 Scale; 05-18-2017 at 06:41 PM. |
05-08-2017, 11:45 PM | #20 | |
User
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Michigan
Posts: 308
Thanks: 134
Thanked 43 Times in 30 Posts
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|