my profile |
register |
faq |
search upload photo | donate | calendar |
12-31-2019, 09:45 PM | #21 |
User
Join Date: Oct 2011
Posts: 261
Thanks: 2
Thanked 67 Times in 35 Posts
|
just tossing my 2 cents on stolen lugers. Say someone has pops old 1918 erfurt sn1234c luger stolen and reports it to the police. police and owner records it as erfurt 9mm sn1234 (nobody knows that the c is part of the serial number. He's it's not a Glock19) so now every erfurt sn1234 is considered a stolen gun because uninformed owner or police put the wrong information into the database. They didnt know the numbers and letters were recycled every year.
And if you have a Or am I thinking this all wrong? jim |
01-01-2020, 02:52 AM | #22 | |
User
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Byron, Georgia
Posts: 1,700
Thanks: 792
Thanked 1,694 Times in 556 Posts
|
Quote:
Then every Luger ever made by DWM, Erfurt, Mauser etc. with a serial number 1234 would be considered stolen. |
|
01-01-2020, 10:54 AM | #23 | |
User
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: near Charlotte NC
Posts: 4,681
Thanks: 1,442
Thanked 4,350 Times in 2,040 Posts
|
Quote:
It can and does happen, as I said above- it did to me. No amount of "explaining" will make it go away if one is caught in the "do loop" of explaining luger serial numbering/models/years/manufacturer to the uninitiated- as in law enforcement or non-collector "civilians".
__________________
03man(Don Voigt); Luger student and collector. Looking for DWM side plate: 69 ; Dreyse 1907 pistol K.S. Gendarmerie |
|
The following member says Thank You to DonVoigt for your post: |
01-01-2020, 11:54 AM | #24 |
User
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: Southwest Virginia
Posts: 373
Thanks: 772
Thanked 554 Times in 198 Posts
|
This is why you guys shouldn’t collect Lugers. Be safe, stay away from them and stay out of trouble. Because I’m a nice guy I’ll save you all and take the risk on everyone’s behalf. 😁
__________________
John 8:32 reive (riːv) vb (Military) (intr) dialect Scot and Northern English to go on a plundering raid [variant of reave] ˈreiver n e.g., " Some view the Border Reivers as loveable rogues." |
The following 2 members says Thank You to Bill_in_VA for your post: |
01-10-2020, 12:01 PM | #25 |
User
Join Date: Mar 2019
Location: Florida
Posts: 53
Thanks: 33
Thanked 26 Times in 13 Posts
|
Looks like you won a great P08. IMHO I would take the risk and contact the vet to learn as much as possible about the history of the pistol. You said you bought it at an auction sale so I would think it's probable safe to assume it's not a stolen item.
I also have a 1938 P08 like yours without a matching mag. Could you let me know what the numbers are? |
01-11-2020, 01:16 AM | #26 |
User
Join Date: Nov 2019
Posts: 20
Thanks: 17
Thanked 37 Times in 9 Posts
|
Believe me when I say I'd love to. Call me a glass half empty kind of person, but here are some possible negative consequences that I considered happening:
1) It might trigger some PTSD symptoms. 2) He might want it back. For all I know, it might have been stolen in the 1940s, and he never reported it to the police. Or he would rather give it to a family member.* 3) He might have given the pistol away (I think he likely gave it to his brother) in hopes of never hearing or seeing of it again. 4) He may simply not want to talk about it. 5) In an attempt to get a hold of him, I may end up reaching someone else in the family who wants it for their own personal gain, without any respect for the piece itself. On the other hand, I am fully aware that he may be willing to discuss it all day long and I would love that. But it's my opinion that the potential negative consequences outweigh the positive ones. If the seller didn't hear back from the previous owner, I think it's safe to assume that's all there is to it. Of course, I am always open to opposing viewpoints and other ideas. Maybe I'm wrong and more often than not that's the case . *I don't consider this to be a negative case scenario, although I'd be out $1200. If this were the case, I would respect his wishes and would ship it back to him because he did more to earn it than I did. And it would feel good to know that I helped reunite him with it. |
01-11-2020, 10:55 PM | #27 |
User
Join Date: Mar 2019
Location: Florida
Posts: 53
Thanks: 33
Thanked 26 Times in 13 Posts
|
You are probably making the right decision based on your concerns. However, I didn't make myself clear when I asked about S/N's. What I'm interested in is the S/N's of the mags only. You mentioned they did not match the pistol so I don't think that would be a problem showing them as this is done from time to time on this forum and I for one am always looking for a match for my P08.
|
01-12-2020, 03:35 AM | #28 |
User
Join Date: Nov 2019
Posts: 20
Thanks: 17
Thanked 37 Times in 9 Posts
|
Oops, sorry! I forgot to respond to that part of your message.
I have an all steel mag with S/N 7241. And I have a mag with a wooden bottom and I believe the S/N 7163, but I can't tell for sure what the third digit is. I only believe it's 63 because that's the number on my loading tool as well and it vaguely looks like a "6", or an "8" or possibly a "3". If I may make a suggestion, you may wish to post your magazine serial numbers here in hopes of a search engine indexing them. Then, maybe someone later on with matching mags will search those numbers and will find your post. |
01-12-2020, 12:08 PM | #29 |
User
Join Date: Mar 2019
Location: Florida
Posts: 53
Thanks: 33
Thanked 26 Times in 13 Posts
|
Thanks cyanghost for responding to my request. Unfortunately, your mag numbers do not match what I'm looking for. I did in fact post a request some time back that I was looking for a mag with the S/N of 3738 and did get a response for one that was close to it. However, the mag I already have is also close to it. Someday maybe....
|
Tags |
1938, bring back, luger, mauser, s/42 |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|