![]() |
my profile |
register |
faq |
search upload photo | donate | calendar |
![]() |
#1 |
User
Join Date: May 2024
Location: Hayden Idaho
Posts: 18
Thanks: 30
Thanked 45 Times in 10 Posts
|
![]()
I’m going to run a magazine through my early S/42 , I’ve replaced the original matching numbered firing pin with an original backup as I’ve heard the strength of the metallurgy changes with age? Suggestions? Lighter loaded Ammo? Grains ? 115? Thoughts? Thanks Jim (also my AC41 P.38)
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
User
Join Date: Aug 2018
Location: Rocky Mountain High
Posts: 309
Thanks: 173
Thanked 246 Times in 84 Posts
|
![]()
I think the firing pin would be the least of my worries of breaking any part. Me, it would be the ejector.
Last edited by Roadster 02; 06-27-2024 at 06:18 PM. |
![]() |
![]() |
The following member says Thank You to Roadster 02 for your post: |
![]() |
#3 |
Lifer
Lifetime Forum Patron Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: Austin, Texas
Posts: 698
Thanks: 2,062
Thanked 573 Times in 307 Posts
|
![]()
... and, yes 115gr FMJ "target loads" are best.
Winchester or PPU if you can find them. Avoid high powered "P+" or "NATO" ammunition. |
![]() |
![]() |
The following 4 members says Thank You to Mac Cat for your post: |
![]() |
#5 |
User
Join Date: Aug 2023
Posts: 66
Thanks: 10
Thanked 49 Times in 30 Posts
|
![]()
The Blazer brass would be my recommendation if you don't have the ability to make reduced power reloads.
It is possibly the new WWB. Lots of people are having problems with WWB these days, myself included. It is now made both in the U.S. and Bosnia. Running it through my chronograph revealed a 200 fps velocity standard deviation. And it's now referred to as "Training Ammo", printed on the box as such. The Blazer Brass is better IMHO, and priced about the same. Regardless, either brand with 115 grain bullets will put a bit less recoil stress on the pistol than 124 grainers. There are people who will say they shoot full bore loads through their P.08's and have done so for years with no bad results. I'm an abundance of caution kinda guy and can reload reduced power rounds, so I do. I shoot steel plates at 25 yards at about 750 fps and I have noted that the plates can't tell any difference at all. Ditto for paper targets. All the above caveats absolutely apply to your P.38, perhaps even more so, as I have seen more broken parts on WW2 P.38's than P.08's, which is why so many people suggest buying a post-war P1 for regular range shooting. If your 1937 P.08 is a collectible, then running a couple of magazines through it should be OK to verify function, but if you want a Luger to shoot regularly then you would be better off buying a "shooter grade" in the $1,000-$1,200 price range as opposed to taking a similar value hit on your 1937 Luger should you break a serial numbered part. Just my 2 cents worth. Differing opinions may be forthcoming. -Bob Last edited by velodog455~; 06-28-2024 at 08:36 AM. Reason: Clarity |
![]() |
![]() |
The following 3 members says Thank You to velodog455~ for your post: |
![]() |
#6 |
User
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Byron, Georgia
Posts: 1,692
Thanks: 789
Thanked 1,670 Times in 548 Posts
|
![]()
On the surface that load is almost identical to the WW1 German military load which was a 123 grain bullet at approximately 1090 fps. Depending upon the powder burn rate, it should work well. If you have any doubts, use the Winchester 115 grain loads.
|
![]() |
![]() |
The following member says Thank You to Doubs for your post: |
![]() |
#7 |
Super Moderator - Patron
LugerForum Life Patron Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Eastern North Carolina, USA
Posts: 3,907
Thanks: 1,374
Thanked 3,108 Times in 1,509 Posts
|
![]()
My shooter (with one side full of "road rash" from holster storage is a 1937 Mauser.
__________________
- Therefore if you want peace, prepare for war. |
![]() |
![]() |
The following member says Thank You to mrerick for your post: |
![]() |
#8 |
Moderator
Lifetime LugerForum Patron Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Europe
Posts: 5,053
Thanks: 1,036
Thanked 3,987 Times in 1,205 Posts
|
![]()
But it still is a lottery. Every shot fired could be the last one for a numbered part.
A mismatched shooter grade luger shoots the same as a high value investment gun. |
![]() |
![]() |
The following 5 members says Thank You to Vlim for your post: |
![]() |
#9 |
User
Join Date: May 2018
Location: Vista, Ca
Posts: 23
Thanks: 15
Thanked 20 Times in 11 Posts
|
![]()
On my matching number "42" 1939, which I shoot fairly regularly, I've replaced the numbered:
1. Firing pin 2. Holdback 3. Extractor 4. Breechblock Somewhere around $200 in parts. I did not replace the matching-number toggle links, so there's risk there. I don't think the ejector is serialized. Wasn't on my 1939. IMO, shooter-grade Lugers are much more uncommon than matching-numbers Lugers. Perhaps a lot of forced-matching going on? |
![]() |
![]() |
The following member says Thank You to Randall_G for your post: |
![]() |
|
|