LugerForum Discussion Forums my profile | register | faq | search
upload photo | donate | calendar

Go Back   LugerForum Discussion Forums > Luger Discussion Forums > Navy Lugers

Reply
Thread Tools Display Modes
Unread 03-22-2011, 07:56 PM   #1
cirelaw
Lifer
Lifetime Forum
Patron
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: PORT ST LUCIE, FLORIDA
Posts: 12,216
Thanks: 6,209
Thanked 4,133 Times in 2,173 Posts
Default Why Did They Do Away With Grip Safetys

starting in 1908
Attached Thumbnails
Click image for larger version

Name:	1 navy b.jpg
Views:	34
Size:	109.0 KB
ID:	18017  

cirelaw is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 03-23-2011, 12:10 AM   #2
Edward Tinker
Super Moderator
Eternal Lifer
LugerForum
Patron
 
Edward Tinker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: North of Spokane, WA
Posts: 15,909
Thanks: 1,986
Thanked 4,500 Times in 2,076 Posts
Default

The "german" military did not want them, so it was dropped.

The civilians did not mind and thus they kept selling old stock for several years.

Some military's did like them, the dutch for instance, Brazilians and Portuguese.


Ed
__________________
Edward Tinker
************
Co-Author of Police Lugers - Co-Author of Simson Lugers
Author of Veteran Bring Backs Vol I, Vol II, Vol III and Vol IV

Edward Tinker is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 03-23-2011, 09:51 AM   #3
Lugerdoc
Patron
LugerForum
Patron
 
Lugerdoc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: POB 398 St.Charles,MO. 63302
Posts: 5,089
Thanks: 6
Thanked 736 Times in 483 Posts
Default

Not to mention the Swiss, who continued to make the grip safety until 1946. I've heard of functioning problems due to debris build up or broken springs, but the primary reason was probably cost reduction. TH
__________________
Tom Heller POB 398 ST.Charles, MO. 63302
Tel 636-447-3006 lugerdoc@charter.net
Lugerdoc is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 03-23-2011, 04:14 PM   #4
George Anderson
Lifer
Lifetime Forum
Patron
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: VA
Posts: 3,592
Thanks: 1,769
Thanked 2,527 Times in 786 Posts
Default

Most importantly it was a matter of cost.
George Anderson is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 03-23-2011, 04:31 PM   #5
Ron Wood
Moderator
2010 LugerForum
Patron
 
Ron Wood's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Santa Teresa New Mexico just outside of the West Texas town of El Paso
Posts: 6,986
Thanks: 1,065
Thanked 5,088 Times in 1,674 Posts
Default

The stock lug, grip safety and the holdopen were eliminated as a cost saving measure when the German Army adopted the Luger in 1908. The grip safety wasn't missed, but the eliminating the holdopen was a false economy whose error was soon realized. It was reinstated in 1913 and many of the earlier guns were retrofitted with the holdopen. The stock lug also reappeared in late 1913 primarily due to the advent of the LP08. The grip safety never returned in the German military, but survived in the Swiss, Dutch, Brazilian and Portuguese Lugers.
__________________
If it's made after 1918...it's a reproduction
Ron Wood is offline   Reply With Quote
The following member says Thank You to Ron Wood for your post:
Unread 03-23-2011, 08:50 PM   #6
deepdarkwoodsman
User
 
deepdarkwoodsman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 38
Thanks: 1
Thanked 5 Times in 1 Post
Default

Doing away with the grip safety not also cut costs, but also sped up production.

Doug
deepdarkwoodsman is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 03-24-2011, 12:34 PM   #7
cirelaw
Lifer
Lifetime Forum
Patron
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: PORT ST LUCIE, FLORIDA
Posts: 12,216
Thanks: 6,209
Thanked 4,133 Times in 2,173 Posts
Default

It was one less mechanical device to f%&* up!!
cirelaw is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 05-02-2011, 06:08 PM   #8
HKMan
User
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Michigan
Posts: 11
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Exclamation It was a good safety device!!

All of that may be true but a grip safety is a very good Safety device on a single action only auto pistol!

I like the one on my Interarms Swiss Pattern 6" Mauser Luger. It's always been present on the 1911 .45 Auto.
HKMan is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 05-02-2011, 10:04 PM   #9
silverknife
User
 
silverknife's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Western New York
Posts: 78
Thanks: 11
Thanked 19 Times in 13 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by HKMan View Post
All of that may be true but a grip safety is a very good Safety device on a single action only auto pistol!

I like the one on my Interarms Swiss Pattern 6" Mauser Luger. It's always been present on the 1911 .45 Auto.
I find the grip safety akward on my Interarms imported .30 Luger. You sort of have to reach around the grip with your strong side hand to depress the grip safety in order to keep it from binding. Hugh Clark's modification of the grips helps a lot but I still do not like it. I find the military version much more comfortable, although I do understand that the Swiss pattern grip adds to the awkwardness (at least for me) of the firing position, I can see why it was omitted from the military version besides reducing the number of parts.

The 1911 grip safety bites pretty hard if you do not watch your grip on the weapon, and even the lengthened 1911 A1 grip safety which I put on my Colt 1911 bites me once in a while. Still, they are both great fun to shoot.

Regards,
Doug

Need a #23 side plate and toggle axle and a #01 hold open latch.
silverknife is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:56 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 1998 - 2024, Lugerforum.com