LugerForum Discussion Forums my profile | register | faq | search
upload photo | donate | calendar

Go Back   LugerForum Discussion Forums > Luger Discussion Forums > All Post-WWII Lugers

Reply
Thread Tools Display Modes
Unread 11-14-2014, 07:16 PM   #1
S.B.
User
 
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: CentraL Illinois
Posts: 35
Thanks: 1
Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
Default What is the correct tool markings for a

1939 code 42 Luger? I'm talking about the tool that goes in the holster pocket on top flap.
Steve
__________________
Ther first point and click interface was a Smith & Wesson.
S.B. is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 11-14-2014, 07:32 PM   #2
Norme
Always A
Lifetime Forum
Patron
 
Norme's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Colorado
Posts: 2,414
Thanks: 224
Thanked 2,591 Times in 930 Posts
Default

Hi Steve, You want a tool like this, SE/655 (Stick Eagle/655).
Regards, Norm
Attached Thumbnails
Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_0475.jpg
Views:	32
Size:	54.7 KB
ID:	43982  

Norme is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 11-15-2014, 08:41 AM   #3
S.B.
User
 
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: CentraL Illinois
Posts: 35
Thanks: 1
Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
Default

Thank you, sir.
Steve
__________________
Ther first point and click interface was a Smith & Wesson.
S.B. is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 11-15-2014, 11:50 AM   #4
tharpo
Lifer
Lifetime Forum
Patron
 
tharpo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: West Coast, USA
Posts: 536
Thanks: 116
Thanked 375 Times in 153 Posts
Default

I would think a SE/63 with the large 63 would also be correct.
Attached Thumbnails
Click image for larger version

Name:	tools 013 E63 (2).jpg
Views:	31
Size:	144.0 KB
ID:	43989  

tharpo is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 11-15-2014, 04:25 PM   #5
S.B.
User
 
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: CentraL Illinois
Posts: 35
Thanks: 1
Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
Default

Seems to be some difference of opinion, here? Anyway, thanks to all who contributed to this discussion.
Steve
__________________
Ther first point and click interface was a Smith & Wesson.
S.B. is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 11-15-2014, 04:41 PM   #6
Norme
Always A
Lifetime Forum
Patron
 
Norme's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Colorado
Posts: 2,414
Thanks: 224
Thanked 2,591 Times in 930 Posts
Default

Steve, look at your gun, if it has SE/655 inspection marks, as my 1939 42 has, then you need an SE/655 tool.
Regards, Norm
Norme is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 11-15-2014, 06:51 PM   #7
guns3545
Lifer
Lifetime Forum
Patron
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Florida
Posts: 435
Thanks: 649
Thanked 490 Times in 216 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by S.B. View Post
Seems to be some difference of opinion, here? Anyway, thanks to all who contributed to this discussion.
Steve
Steve,

What you are seeing is an every day occurrence in Luger collecting and the provision of answers to questions by others.

The more information you have; the more accurate can be the responses. As you may know, 1939 was a year of many changes; and not all of them synchronized.

A SE63 or SE655 are both correct. The phasing of your precise serial number will make one or the other more correct.

The acceptance marks on your particular gun are also a factor in determining the probability of which tool mark is more correct.

Thus going in with a question that was stated. I have a 1939 42 code with the SN vvvvv, and acceptance proofs SE63 SE63 or SE63 SE655 or SE655 SE 655 would have elicited a more precise response right out of the box.

But over riding everything else is the fact that gun makers and ordnance depots waste nothing and throw nothing away unless it has been condemned. They were not making collector pieces; they were making war guns. Thus if a barrel of old SE63 inspected tools was found, they were used. Basically anything used up to the manufacture of a gun is potentially what it was issued with. Yon can even find magazines with acceptance marks that differ to the gun but are serial numbered to it.


Add to this the phasing differences of manufacture, delays in shipping, etc., it can become very difficult to tie all components to a specific rig in the best of circumstances and even more difficult in a year of many changes happening over a period of time,

Hope this helps.

John
guns3545 is offline   Reply With Quote
The following 2 members says Thank You to guns3545 for your post:
Unread 11-15-2014, 07:13 PM   #8
George Anderson
Lifer
Lifetime Forum
Patron
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: VA
Posts: 3,592
Thanks: 1,769
Thanked 2,527 Times in 786 Posts
Default

A truly good and valuable answer to an often asked question.
George Anderson is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 11-15-2014, 09:27 PM   #9
S.B.
User
 
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: CentraL Illinois
Posts: 35
Thanks: 1
Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
Default

Yes, John, I think you've answered a lot of my question's variables. Thanks again to all responders.
Steve
__________________
Ther first point and click interface was a Smith & Wesson.
S.B. is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 11-16-2014, 05:24 PM   #10
kubel
User
 
kubel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Ohio
Posts: 124
Thanks: 5
Thanked 32 Times in 20 Posts
Default

If this is to go with the Luger he recently purchased from me, the Waffenamts on the right side of the upper receiver are SE63, SE63. The pistol is an "r" block.
kubel is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:21 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 1998 - 2024, Lugerforum.com