LugerForum Discussion Forums my profile | register | faq | search
upload photo | donate | calendar

Go Back   LugerForum Discussion Forums > Luger Discussion Forums > Unit Markings

Reply
Thread Tools Display Modes
Unread 04-10-2010, 11:44 PM   #1
ktucker5
User
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 7
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default 1918/1920 DWM Markings

I picked up my first Luger this weekend (for what I believe was a grood deal) and all of the numbers match except an unmarked, but period correct magazine. Based on what I've read to date on the forum what appear to be the unit markings are in an unusual position. It is marked RWSI1 on the right side of the pistol to the left of the military proof marks. Can anyone tell me more about these markings? Thanks,
Bill
ktucker5 is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 04-11-2010, 08:43 AM   #2
Ron Smith
User
 
Ron Smith's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Orygun
Posts: 4,243
Thanks: 118
Thanked 245 Times in 150 Posts
Default

Hi Bill,

Welcome to the forum.

Is it possible to get a good clear photo of the mark? Without a photo, it's not really possible to say for certain. An unusual marking in an unusual location.

Ron
__________________
I Still Need DWM side plate #49... if anyone runs across a nice one.


What ~Rudyard Kipling~ said...
Ron Smith is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 04-11-2010, 12:34 PM   #3
JTD
User
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: PA
Posts: 424
Thanks: 214
Thanked 407 Times in 148 Posts
Default

Bill, I believe you may have a Weimar era provisional unit mark that is for the Reichs Wasserschutzpoleizzie(SP?) Does it have a sear safty installed? Pics would be nice. I may be intrested if for sale or trade. I have a thing for such provisional marks.John
JTD is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 04-11-2010, 01:02 PM   #4
Don M
Patron
LugerForum
Patron
 
Don M's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 1,429
Thanks: 67
Thanked 292 Times in 191 Posts
Default

The mark is probably R.W.S.II. If so, it is from the Weser/Ems district of the Reichs Wasserschutz (HWIS, pp. 316-318). I don't think it is a provisional marking. The RWS apparently had no strict standards about where to mark weapons.

I too would love to see photos and to learn the serial number & suffix and whether it has or had sear or mag safeties. I doubt the latter.
__________________
Regards,
Don
donmaus1@aol.com

Author of History Writ in Steel: German Police Markings 1900-1936
http://www.historywritinsteel.com
Don M is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 04-11-2010, 07:19 PM   #5
ktucker5
User
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 7
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

Thanks for the responses, I will try and get some pictures posted this evening. I'm not the most technologically proficient, but should be able to get a couple of photos that should show the detail you may need.
ktucker5 is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 04-11-2010, 07:21 PM   #6
ktucker5
User
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 7
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

Forgot to list in the previous post, but the gun is numbered 618H
ktucker5 is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 04-11-2010, 07:52 PM   #7
ktucker5
User
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 7
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

Attached is my first photo attempt. Please let me know your thoughts. Thanks,

Bill
Attached Thumbnails
Click image for larger version

Name:	0411001844.jpg
Views:	37
Size:	78.4 KB
ID:	12522  

ktucker5 is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 04-11-2010, 08:03 PM   #8
ktucker5
User
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 7
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

hopefully a little clearer image
Attached Thumbnails
Click image for larger version

Name:	0411001900.jpg
Views:	36
Size:	82.6 KB
ID:	12523  

ktucker5 is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 04-11-2010, 08:24 PM   #9
ktucker5
User
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 7
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

Another photo
Attached Images
 
ktucker5 is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 04-11-2010, 10:55 PM   #10
ktucker5
User
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 7
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

To answer a couple of earlier questions, there is no evidence of this pistol ever having either a sear or magazine safety. Thanks
ktucker5 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:58 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 1998 - 2024, Lugerforum.com