LugerForum Discussion Forums my profile | register | faq | search
upload photo | donate | calendar

Go Back   LugerForum Discussion Forums > Luger Discussion Forums > All P-08 Military Lugers

Reply
Thread Tools Display Modes
Unread 05-27-2022, 01:39 PM   #21
Doubs
User
 
Doubs's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Byron, Georgia
Posts: 1,663
Thanks: 762
Thanked 1,586 Times in 517 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Yakman View Post
If it were illegal to remove an import mark, it would seem one could not remove and replace a barrel, for example, if the mark were placed on that barrel. Jack
Excellent point. I have a post-WW1 rework of an Erfurt military pistol. The date was scrubbed and a new .30 caliber barrel installed. Other than the barrel, it's all matching. CAI put their import markings on the underside of the barrel.

Doubs is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 05-27-2022, 05:24 PM   #22
tomaustin
Lifer X5
Lifetime Forum
Patron
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: texas
Posts: 708
Thanks: 87
Thanked 522 Times in 201 Posts
Default

yak...my view is in the eye of the person making the decision to change the history of the weapon to gain some advantage for the tale to be told to others about their rifle or handgun...

removing an import mark to enhance your story is clearly wrong.....

but, a shot-out barrel on an otherwise serviceable weapon would seem to be an acceptable servicing of the rifle or handgun....

just save the original barrel as part of that weapon's history..

enjoy your shooting...........

Last edited by tomaustin; 05-27-2022 at 05:26 PM. Reason: ..
tomaustin is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 05-27-2022, 08:23 PM   #23
Norme
Always A
Lifetime Forum
Patron
 
Norme's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Colorado
Posts: 2,414
Thanks: 223
Thanked 2,590 Times in 930 Posts
Default

I know of one instance where an importers mark actually adds considerable value. I'm referring to the Navy Lugers imported into the US from Ireland in 1991. Most of the 20 or so guns are in poor shape with mis-matched parts, but they are marked by Bill Edwards, the importer, on the top of the right frame rail, concealed when the gun is assembled.
They were smuggled into Ireland by U boat in 1914 just prior to the Easter Uprising, an effort by Germany to foment trouble and tie down British troops that would otherwise be in France.
They are much desired by Luger collectors of Irish descent, and I'd dearly like to own one myself even though I'm British by birth.
Norm
Norme is offline   Reply With Quote
The following 7 members says Thank You to Norme for your post:
Unread 05-27-2022, 10:10 PM   #24
Yakman
User
 
Yakman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: Indiana
Posts: 117
Thanks: 872
Thanked 75 Times in 38 Posts
Default

Norme, I can think of a couple other importers whose marks have increased the value of the pistols they appear on, AF Stoeger and Ambercrombie & Fitch.

I say that jokingly but have often wondered what's so special about those importers. Stoeger, for example, imported SAFE/LOADED marked pistols with no other distinguishing marks. I wonder why convention makes those with Stoeger's import mark more desirable and consequently more valuable. Collectors also like Pacific Arms' identifying marks, and their guns are mostly, if not all, reworks, what I'd call the bottom of the barrel for collectables. They derive their increased value and collectability solely from Pacific Arms identifying marks, not the pistols themselves.

I'm guilty of following this convention, too.

Jack
Yakman is offline   Reply With Quote
The following 2 members says Thank You to Yakman for your post:
Unread 05-28-2022, 08:28 AM   #25
schutzen-jager
User
 
schutzen-jager's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2020
Location: peoples republic of New Jersey
Posts: 187
Thanks: 208
Thanked 187 Times in 86 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Doubs View Post
Excellent point. I have a post-WW1 rework of an Erfurt military pistol. The date was scrubbed and a new .30 caliber barrel installed. Other than the barrel, it's all matching. CAI put their import markings on the underside of the barrel.

almost definitely barreled by Century overseas before importation - common practice with them if the work could be done cheaper in some foreign countries -
schutzen-jager is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 05-28-2022, 11:41 AM   #26
Doubs
User
 
Doubs's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Byron, Georgia
Posts: 1,663
Thanks: 762
Thanked 1,586 Times in 517 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by schutzen-jager View Post
almost definitely barreled by Century overseas before importation - common practice with them if the work could be done cheaper in some foreign countries -
I disagree. The rework was done post-WW1 - 1920's - and sold somewhere in Europe as there is no "Germany" stamp. The barrel is far from having been recently installed. The poorly stamped "M23" suggests that it was imported from Finland where it may have been sold commercially.
Doubs is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 05-29-2022, 08:20 AM   #27
schutzen-jager
User
 
schutzen-jager's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2020
Location: peoples republic of New Jersey
Posts: 187
Thanks: 208
Thanked 187 Times in 86 Posts
Default

used barrel installed before import - Finns were famous for cannibalizing captured foreign pistols + rifles for reissue - you neglected to mention connection wit Finland in your post -post WWI when Finland became independent they acquired large quantities of German pistols including c96 mausers + p08 lugers - in 1923 they standardized them all to 7.65 luger [ broomhandles included ] - Century imported them in late 80's + early 90's - the extremely rare ones are the P08's purchased direct from DWM in 1923 in 7.65 -

Last edited by schutzen-jager; 05-29-2022 at 10:10 AM. Reason: spellin -
schutzen-jager is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 05-29-2022, 01:41 PM   #28
Doubs
User
 
Doubs's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Byron, Georgia
Posts: 1,663
Thanks: 762
Thanked 1,586 Times in 517 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by schutzen-jager View Post
used barrel installed before import - Finns were famous for cannibalizing captured foreign pistols + rifles for reissue - you neglected to mention connection wit Finland in your post -post WWI when Finland became independent they acquired large quantities of German pistols including c96 mausers + p08 lugers - in 1923 they standardized them all to 7.65 luger [ broomhandles included ] - Century imported them in late 80's + early 90's - the extremely rare ones are the P08's purchased direct from DWM in 1923 in 7.65 -
Why would I mention Finland in my original post? They had nothing to do with the import marking on the barrel and the discussion was about import stamps.

Exactly on what "facts" are you basing your conclusions? You're making a lot of claims without proof. There's no way to prove who replaced the barrel or when but thousands of Lugers were re-barreled to 30 caliber with new barrels in the 1920's for sale on the commercial market and that is the most likely explanation.
Doubs is offline   Reply With Quote
The following 3 members says Thank You to Doubs for your post:
Unread 05-29-2022, 03:49 PM   #29
cirelaw
Lifer
Lifetime Forum
Patron
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: PORT ST LUCIE, FLORIDA
Posts: 12,216
Thanks: 6,209
Thanked 4,133 Times in 2,173 Posts
Default

Do they desinate where the import mark should be placed? What about placing it on a part that can be replaced~ Ie Barrel?
cirelaw is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 05-29-2022, 04:06 PM   #30
cirelaw
Lifer
Lifetime Forum
Patron
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: PORT ST LUCIE, FLORIDA
Posts: 12,216
Thanks: 6,209
Thanked 4,133 Times in 2,173 Posts
Default

Are we to assume that all luger without import stamps were imported to the US, including GI bring backs don't apply to the law changed!
cirelaw is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 05-29-2022, 04:09 PM   #31
cirelaw
Lifer
Lifetime Forum
Patron
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: PORT ST LUCIE, FLORIDA
Posts: 12,216
Thanks: 6,209
Thanked 4,133 Times in 2,173 Posts
Default

Found It~~https://www.atf.gov/firearms/firearm...ation-overview
cirelaw is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 05-29-2022, 04:13 PM   #32
schutzen-jager
User
 
schutzen-jager's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2020
Location: peoples republic of New Jersey
Posts: 187
Thanks: 208
Thanked 187 Times in 86 Posts
Default

ATF regulations have changed at least 3 times since 1968 as to placement , size , + content - - like the one shown in picture does not have country of origin which is now a current requirement -
i believe this to be the most current
- Title 27 CFR Part 478.92 requires that within 15 days after release from Customs custody, each firearm imported shall be identified by engraving or casting the serial number on the frame or receiver; in addition, the following (1) model, (2) caliber or gauge, (3) name of manufacturer an country where manufactured and (4) the name, city and State of the importer shall be engraved, cast or stamped on the frame, receiver or barrel. must be to a minimum depth of.003 inch and in a print size no smaller than 1/16 inch Name of Manufacturer Must be conspicuously engraved, cast or stamped (impressed) on the firearm frame, receiver, barrel or slide - ]
schutzen-jager is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 05-29-2022, 04:36 PM   #33
schutzen-jager
User
 
schutzen-jager's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2020
Location: peoples republic of New Jersey
Posts: 187
Thanks: 208
Thanked 187 Times in 86 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Doubs View Post
Why would I mention Finland in my original post? They had nothing to do with the import marking on the barrel and the discussion was about import stamps.

Exactly on what "facts" are you basing your conclusions? You're making a lot of claims without proof. There's no way to prove who replaced the barrel or when but thousands of Lugers were re-barreled to 30 caliber with new barrels in the 1920's for sale on the commercial market and that is the most likely explanation.
try doing a little research before making definitive statements - try the books by Walter , Hoffschmidt , Berger + others - also search the 1988 + later catalogs published by Century arms - the 1920's barrels were manufactured in Finland by both Sako + Tikka - the small CAI above the faint Finn markings prove that barrel was replaced before import + size + content of import marks are consistant with late 80's early 90's import -
schutzen-jager is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 05-29-2022, 04:37 PM   #34
schutzen-jager
User
 
schutzen-jager's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2020
Location: peoples republic of New Jersey
Posts: 187
Thanks: 208
Thanked 187 Times in 86 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by cirelaw View Post
Are we to assume that all luger without import stamps were imported to the US, including GI bring backs don't apply to the law changed!
import stamps not required on U.S. imports prior to December 1968 -
schutzen-jager is offline   Reply With Quote
The following member says Thank You to schutzen-jager for your post:
Unread 05-29-2022, 06:20 PM   #35
Doubs
User
 
Doubs's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Byron, Georgia
Posts: 1,663
Thanks: 762
Thanked 1,586 Times in 517 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by schutzen-jager View Post
the 1920's barrels were manufactured in Finland by both Sako + Tikka - the small CAI above the faint Finn markings prove that barrel was replaced before import
First you claim it was "almost definitely" replaced by CAI before import.

Then you claim it was a used barrel when replaced. If the Finns replaced the barrel, it would have been new.

Skipping your uncalled for insults about research, of course the barrel was replaced before import... but WHEN? It's an Imperial Erfurt Luger from 1917 or 1918.

"Faint Finn markings"? WHERE, exactly? No such thing on that barrel. It has only the marks put there by CAI. In the 1990's, CAI imported Lugers from many places with Finland being but one country they came from.

As the Finns didn't adopt the Luger in 30 caliber before 1923 and Germany was prohibited from providing 9mm Lugers at that time - the reason Finland went with 30 caliber to begin with - why is it more likely that the Finns did the re-barrel than the Germans? The CAI stamp is the ONLY about the pistol to even suggest it was ever in Finland.
Doubs is offline   Reply With Quote
The following 3 members says Thank You to Doubs for your post:
Unread 05-30-2022, 09:35 AM   #36
schutzen-jager
User
 
schutzen-jager's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2020
Location: peoples republic of New Jersey
Posts: 187
Thanks: 208
Thanked 187 Times in 86 Posts
Default

First you claim it was "almost definitely" replaced by CAI before import.

Then you claim it was a used barrel when replaced. If the Finns replaced the barrel, it would have been new. ]

my first post was made before you stated the Finn connection + the stampings below the CAI mark were not clear in your picture at all - the Finns were notorious for salvaging parts to recondition weapons + with out the clear Finn markings this would be totally possible - the m23 marking makes it a Finn manufactured bbl. + stamping appears much different then CAI marking above it - my so called insult is much less cutting then you basically calling me a liar back 11/2/20 in post about Luger stocks with ground lugs in old ATF regulations - the 7.65 was standardized in 1923 by Finns -the m23 below CAi on bbl. is Finn arsenal designation - the Finns were using large quantities of Lugers + Mausers in military service as soon as they declared independence from Russia prior to 1923
schutzen-jager is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 05-30-2022, 01:26 PM   #37
Doubs
User
 
Doubs's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Byron, Georgia
Posts: 1,663
Thanks: 762
Thanked 1,586 Times in 517 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by schutzen-jager View Post
my first post was made before you stated the Finn connection + the stampings below the CAI mark were not clear in your picture at all -
The stampings in the picture are perfectly clear and if you had actually looked at them you'd have seen the M.23 stamp.

Quote:
the Finns were notorious for salvaging parts to recondition weapons + with out the clear Finn markings this would be totally possible - the m23 marking makes it a Finn manufactured bbl. + stamping appears much different then CAI marking above it
ALL the markings are the identical size and font. Only the depth of the strikes are different. ALL of them were put there by CAI; NOT the Finns.

Quote:
- my so called insult is much less cutting then you basically calling me a liar back 11/2/20 in post about Luger stocks with ground lugs in old ATF regulations -
So this is more about your hurt feelings a year and a half ago than anything else? I don't recall the discussion so maybe you could link it.

Quote:
the 7.65 was standardized in 1923 by Finns -the m23 below CAi on bbl. is Finn arsenal designation -
Again, ALL the markings were put there by CAI. Or, maybe you can explain why the Finns would have stamped "GER" between M.23 and 7.65 PARA. Or the need to put 7.65 PARA there when that's the only cartridge the M.23 used. Furthermore, if G&S and Walter are to be believed, the Finns would have used M/23 and not M.23. Of course if you can provide a reference that the Finns marked their barrels with anything other than the maker's mark or left them bare, I'd like to see it.
Doubs is offline   Reply With Quote
The following member says Thank You to Doubs for your post:
Unread 05-30-2022, 09:36 PM   #38
Mac Cat
Lifer
Lifetime Forum
Patron
 
Mac Cat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: Austin, Texas
Posts: 665
Thanks: 1,994
Thanked 538 Times in 291 Posts
Default

Nobody is calling anyone a "liar".
We are here to fine the truth in a complicated history.
Please keep it civil.
Mac Cat is offline   Reply With Quote
The following 3 members says Thank You to Mac Cat for your post:
Unread 06-01-2022, 01:20 PM   #39
cirelaw
Lifer
Lifetime Forum
Patron
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: PORT ST LUCIE, FLORIDA
Posts: 12,216
Thanks: 6,209
Thanked 4,133 Times in 2,173 Posts
Default

Call me old fashion but I've always only considered a virgin! Wives exception, of course`
cirelaw is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:24 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 1998 - 2023, Lugerforum.com