LugerForum Discussion Forums my profile | register | faq | search
upload photo | donate | calendar

Go Back   LugerForum Discussion Forums > Luger Discussion Forums > Unit Markings

Reply
Thread Tools Display Modes
Unread 05-26-2014, 02:28 AM   #1
Mach2Plus
User
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: Houston Texas
Posts: 13
Thanks: 9
Thanked 3 Times in 2 Posts
Default DWM chamber marked 1918

DWM 1918 ser# 6265a. front grip strap marked "169.R.5.51.". Any ideas on translation? Thanks pistol does not have a sear safety,

Last edited by Mach2Plus; 05-26-2014 at 02:33 AM. Reason: add additional info
Mach2Plus is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 05-26-2014, 03:48 AM   #2
Sergio Natali
User
 
Sergio Natali's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Somewhere in Northern Italy
Posts: 2,646
Thanks: 1,082
Thanked 1,783 Times in 1,007 Posts
Default

Rich,

First of all welcome to this forum, then I think that would be interesting to see some close and detailed pictures of your gun.
__________________
"Originality can't be restored and should be at the top of any collector's priority list.
Sergio Natali is offline   Reply With Quote
The following member says Thank You to Sergio Natali for your post:
Unread 05-26-2014, 09:50 AM   #3
Lugerdoc
Patron
LugerForum
Patron
 
Lugerdoc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: POB 398 St.Charles,MO. 63302
Posts: 5,089
Thanks: 6
Thanked 736 Times in 483 Posts
Default

Mach2+, Your grip strap marking is military, not police which would normally have the sear safety added. 169th Infantry Regiment, 5th Company, gun inventory #51. TH
__________________
Tom Heller POB 398 ST.Charles, MO. 63302
Tel 636-447-3006 lugerdoc@charter.net
Lugerdoc is offline   Reply With Quote
The following member says Thank You to Lugerdoc for your post:
Unread 05-26-2014, 10:08 AM   #4
Mach2Plus
User
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: Houston Texas
Posts: 13
Thanks: 9
Thanked 3 Times in 2 Posts
Default

Many thanks for the rapid replies, Gents. I will work on some photos. Happy Memorial Day and Semper Fi!
Mach2Plus is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 05-26-2014, 09:54 PM   #5
roadkill1
Patron
LugerForum
Patron
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Virginia
Posts: 127
Thanks: 166
Thanked 129 Times in 63 Posts
Default

Rich:

Assuming your DWM 1918 Luger is marked to the 169th Infantry Regiment (pictures of the Luger and its markings are always the best confirmation), it has an interesting battle history. This regiment was initially assigned to the 29th Infantry Division, a Baden Division, and remained with the 29th all of 1914 and into 1915. As part of the 29th, your regiment fought in Alsace-Lorraine, Artois and Champagne. The 29th Infantry Division was considered a rated to be a good division by British Intelligence in 1917.

In March, 1915, the 52nd Infantry Division was formed, another division from the Grand Duchy of Baden. Your regiment was assigned to 52nd on this date and remained with this division for the duration of WWI. The 52nd fought in the battles of Artois in April of 1915. During 1916, it fought in the Somme, Alsace, Aisne, Californie Plateau and Champagne. During 1918, the 52nd began fighting in Champagne and then in Picardy, Aisne, Lens, Armentieres, Bapume, and ended the war fighting in the Argonne area.

"The 52d is rated as one of the best German divisions. It was in a great deal of heavy fighting during 1918 (as in producing years) and acquitted itself most creditably."

The above quote, as well as the previous battle history of the 169th Infantry Regiment came from the book entitled, "Histories of Two Hundred and Fifty-One Divisions of the German Army Which Participated in the War (1914-1918)" First published in 1920 by the United States War Office as War Department Document No. 905.

Congrats Rich, you have a wonderful piece of Living History!!

Ron
roadkill1 is offline   Reply With Quote
The following 2 members says Thank You to roadkill1 for your post:
Unread 05-26-2014, 11:41 PM   #6
Mach2Plus
User
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: Houston Texas
Posts: 13
Thanks: 9
Thanked 3 Times in 2 Posts
Default

Fascinating information. Your research efforts are much appreciated. Thanks again, Rich V.
Mach2Plus is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 05-27-2014, 02:28 AM   #7
klaus 3338
User
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Germany
Posts: 513
Thanks: 0
Thanked 394 Times in 156 Posts
Default

Another one of this regiment.
Attached Thumbnails
Click image for larger version

Name:	169R.jpg
Views:	34
Size:	57.6 KB
ID:	41893  

klaus 3338 is offline   Reply With Quote
The following member says Thank You to klaus 3338 for your post:
Unread 05-27-2014, 02:10 PM   #8
Mach2Plus
User
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: Houston Texas
Posts: 13
Thanks: 9
Thanked 3 Times in 2 Posts
Red face

Here are some (amateur) photos:
Attached Thumbnails
Click image for larger version

Name:	2014-05-26_22-47-51_994 (2).jpg
Views:	30
Size:	73.9 KB
ID:	41899  

Click image for larger version

Name:	2014-05-08_22-19-58_979.jpg
Views:	36
Size:	114.2 KB
ID:	41900  

Click image for larger version

Name:	2014-05-26_22-47-51_994 (3).jpg
Views:	25
Size:	81.0 KB
ID:	41901  

Click image for larger version

Name:	2014-05-26_22-48-58_114 (2).jpg
Views:	30
Size:	76.2 KB
ID:	41902  

Click image for larger version

Name:	2014-05-26_22-50-21_989 (2).jpg
Views:	36
Size:	111.8 KB
ID:	41903  

Click image for larger version

Name:	2014-05-26_22-55-01_841 (2).jpg
Views:	37
Size:	118.1 KB
ID:	41904  

Click image for larger version

Name:	2014-05-26_22-58-15_919 (2).jpg
Views:	41
Size:	138.8 KB
ID:	41905  

Click image for larger version

Name:	2014-05-26_22-59-11_370 (2).jpg
Views:	26
Size:	149.3 KB
ID:	41906  

Click image for larger version

Name:	2014-05-27_00-03-10_498 (2).jpg
Views:	33
Size:	144.4 KB
ID:	41907  

Mach2Plus is offline   Reply With Quote
The following 2 members says Thank You to Mach2Plus for your post:
Unread 05-27-2014, 02:48 PM   #9
Mach2Plus
User
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: Houston Texas
Posts: 13
Thanks: 9
Thanked 3 Times in 2 Posts
Default

In certain light and without magnification, that last "3" looks just like a "5".
Mach2Plus is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 05-27-2014, 03:28 PM   #10
Mach2Plus
User
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: Houston Texas
Posts: 13
Thanks: 9
Thanked 3 Times in 2 Posts
Default

Thanks, Klaus, Regards from Texas.
Mach2Plus is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 05-27-2014, 09:41 PM   #11
alanint
User
 
alanint's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Marco Island, Florida
Posts: 4,867
Thanks: 1,685
Thanked 1,916 Times in 1,192 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mach2Plus View Post
In certain light and without magnification, that last "3" looks just like a "5".
The original weapon number was scratched out and a new number, with much larger font was added above the original number. Any number of reasons why this may have happened, but it looks like a period modification.
alanint is offline   Reply With Quote
The following member says Thank You to alanint for your post:
Unread 05-28-2014, 03:11 PM   #12
tenbears
User
 
tenbears's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 370
Thanks: 3
Thanked 26 Times in 15 Posts
Default

If you don't already know any dated 1918 Luger is considered rare. You seldom encounter anything unit marked after 1916. I have a S9805 dated 1917 bayonet that is unit marked and that's it for post 1916 unit marks in my collection.
tenbears is offline   Reply With Quote
The following member says Thank You to tenbears for your post:
Unread 05-28-2014, 03:30 PM   #13
John Sabato
Lifer
Lifetime Forum
Patron
 
John Sabato's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: The Capital of the Free World
Posts: 10,150
Thanks: 3,003
Thanked 2,304 Times in 1,096 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mach2Plus View Post
In certain light and without magnification, that last "3" looks just like a "5".
Take a closer look and you will see what really happened...

The unit armorer who put the unit mark on this pistol accidently stamped the "3" upside down... and then corrected his mistake and overstamped the digit with the "3" correctly oriented...

Quote:
Originally Posted by alanint View Post
... but it looks like a period modification.
I concur... I see no foul or attempt to deceive in this "oops".
__________________
regards, -John S

"...We hold these truths to be self-evident that ALL men are created EQUAL and are endowed by their Creator with certain UNALIENABLE rights, and among these are life, LIBERTY, and the pursuit of happiness..."
John Sabato is offline   Reply With Quote
The following 2 members says Thank You to John Sabato for your post:
Unread 05-28-2014, 04:20 PM   #14
tenbears
User
 
tenbears's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 370
Thanks: 3
Thanked 26 Times in 15 Posts
Default

Enclosed is a picture of a MG unit marked S9805 bayonet with the K struck backwards so it does happen.
Attached Thumbnails
Click image for larger version

Name:	001.JPG
Views:	36
Size:	118.6 KB
ID:	41927  

tenbears is offline   Reply With Quote
The following 4 members says Thank You to tenbears for your post:
Unread 05-28-2014, 09:39 PM   #15
Mach2Plus
User
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: Houston Texas
Posts: 13
Thanks: 9
Thanked 3 Times in 2 Posts
Default

Gentlemen, I certainly appreciate the truly fascinating information about my Luger (my first). Thanks again to all of you for your input! Rich V I suppose that in light of Tenbears information I won't be taking it to the range!

Last edited by Mach2Plus; 05-28-2014 at 09:50 PM. Reason: add info
Mach2Plus is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 05-29-2014, 02:42 PM   #16
Sergio Natali
User
 
Sergio Natali's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Somewhere in Northern Italy
Posts: 2,646
Thanks: 1,082
Thanked 1,783 Times in 1,007 Posts
Default

"The unit armorer who put the unit mark on this pistol accidently stamped the "3" upside down... and then corrected his mistake and overstamped the digit with the "3" correctly oriented..."

John

Congratulations I think you really hit the mark again!

Sergio
__________________
"Originality can't be restored and should be at the top of any collector's priority list.
Sergio Natali is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 05-30-2014, 02:17 AM   #17
klaus 3338
User
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Germany
Posts: 513
Thanks: 0
Thanked 394 Times in 156 Posts
Default

The Infantry Regiment 169 was stationed in Lahr/ Baden. It was part of the 52. Army Corps and saw action in 1918 during the great battle of France- the last offensive of the German Army. Since 1914 was this battle the first for the German Army with great win of terrain.
After the great battle came Flanders for the regiment.
I visited all of the battle places- Flanders seems to have been the hardest of all battle fields to me.
klaus 3338 is offline   Reply With Quote
The following 2 members says Thank You to klaus 3338 for your post:
Unread 05-30-2014, 08:10 AM   #18
cirelaw
Lifer
Lifetime Forum
Patron
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: PORT ST LUCIE, FLORIDA
Posts: 12,216
Thanks: 6,209
Thanked 4,133 Times in 2,173 Posts
Default

I have an artillery from the 169th Baden and researched its' history~Eric http://www.pals.org.uk/ir169_e1.htm
Attached Thumbnails
Click image for larger version

Name:	arty 001.jpg
Views:	33
Size:	244.3 KB
ID:	41937  

Click image for larger version

Name:	arty 002.jpg
Views:	34
Size:	231.5 KB
ID:	41938  

Click image for larger version

Name:	arty 004.jpg
Views:	30
Size:	120.2 KB
ID:	41939  

Attached Images
 

Last edited by cirelaw; 05-30-2014 at 02:20 PM.
cirelaw is offline   Reply With Quote
The following 2 members says Thank You to cirelaw for your post:
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:44 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 1998 - 2024, Lugerforum.com