my profile |
register |
faq |
search upload photo | donate | calendar |
11-07-2015, 01:42 PM | #1 |
User
Join Date: Nov 2015
Posts: 9
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
History help 1916 Luger
I am trying to help a neighbor who owns this Luger. I had intended to send this out for an appraisal by one of the commercial experts but after talking with them, it appears that the gun's value is more sentimental than monetary and the cost of the appraisal would add little to the story of the gun. Not to mention the cost of reclaiming the gun through Brady and transfer fees.
I've been able to piece together some some history but I would prefer to have a more experienced perspective rather than my guess work. I have built a presentation box for this gun and would like to include a narrative that explains the marks. I believe this gun has gone through two wars and has story. The photos below show the serial and proofs. There is almost no "straw" left on anything and the gun is working but reflects its age. The "31" from the serial appears on all the small parts and the grips but I could only find the "F" on one grip. If this is not the right place for this, any advice would be appreciated. |
11-07-2015, 04:53 PM | #2 |
Lifer X5
Lifetime Forum Patron Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: texas
Posts: 708
Thanks: 87
Thanked 522 Times in 201 Posts
|
it is a football Saturday....hang-on , help is coming...........
|
11-07-2015, 06:12 PM | #3 |
Patron
LugerForum Patron Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 4,047
Thanks: 578
Thanked 1,414 Times in 887 Posts
|
Well, it was a DWM WW1 gun originally, later stamped as gov't property (1920). The book guys will tell you what the unit markings SDI represents, but that little stamp over the 9 in 1920 has my eye.
Photos of the entire gun may help us access value, but be patient, those markings will be explained, or at least debated to death, a bit later. Markings withstanding, and given the photos, I'll guestimate $1200-$1500 for retail value, but that is admittedly way premature here. dju |
11-07-2015, 06:54 PM | #4 |
Patron
LugerForum Patron Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Virginia
Posts: 127
Thanks: 166
Thanked 129 Times in 63 Posts
|
The marking on this front grip strap of "S.D.I. 905." is from the Dusseldorf Municipal Police District, Section I, pistol #905. The reference for this identification is from German Small Arms Markings, by Gortz and Bryans, Chapter V, Police Unit Markings, pp. 93-96.
Ron |
11-07-2015, 08:10 PM | #5 |
User
Join Date: Nov 2015
Posts: 9
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Gents, thank you for the info thus far and it is exactly what I need. The value is in the contextual history and I'd really like to tell the story of this gun when I return it to him. I'll put to together tomorrow and take a complete picture as well as a better image of the mark under the 1920. Thank you again.
|
11-07-2015, 08:42 PM | #6 |
User
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: near Charlotte NC
Posts: 4,677
Thanks: 1,439
Thanked 4,347 Times in 2,038 Posts
|
The mark "under" the 1920 is a crown/ G; a known acceptance mark for pistols taken into police service in the Weimar era.
|
11-07-2015, 09:57 PM | #7 |
User
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: US
Posts: 3,843
Thanks: 132
Thanked 729 Times in 438 Posts
|
Saw three double dates today: a relatively rare 1920/1920 sold $840, a 1910/1920 sold $750 (looks being original on pictures), and a 1918/1920 sold $780. Short on cash these days, otherwise they could be great.
|
11-08-2015, 10:15 AM | #8 | |
User
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: near Charlotte NC
Posts: 4,677
Thanks: 1,439
Thanked 4,347 Times in 2,038 Posts
|
Quote:
Not all police lugers have the sear safety, those used by the "barracked police" in Prussia did not have to have the safety added, at least not until 1937 or so when Himmler ordered all police pistols to hvet the sear safety. Bavarian and Saxon(and a couple other states) pistols may also be without, again until 1937;though some would have had them added late. Subject to correction by Don M. or Ed T, or Dwight G., they are the experts on Police lugers. |
|
11-08-2015, 05:30 PM | #9 |
User
Join Date: Nov 2015
Posts: 9
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Additional pictures as requested.
|
11-09-2015, 01:49 PM | #10 |
User
Join Date: Nov 2015
Posts: 9
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
The crown-G mark under the 1920 is proving hard to identify. It is dissimilar to the crown G proof mark in the FAB and elsewhere and I'm not finding this mark elsewhere in the references. Can you elaborate? Is it in conjuction with the 1920 mark?
|
11-09-2015, 02:14 PM | #11 | |
User
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: near Charlotte NC
Posts: 4,677
Thanks: 1,439
Thanked 4,347 Times in 2,038 Posts
|
Quote:
The crown/G is only found on some early lugers taken into police use. It is not related to the 1920 marking, but is an inspection or acceptance mark applied by the police. It is shown in Police Lugers by Tinker and Gruber and in Jan Still's Weimar luger; discussion is minimal, and not much is known about the who, where, when, the C/G was applied. |
|
11-09-2015, 03:28 PM | #12 |
Patron
LugerForum Patron Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 1,429
Thanks: 67
Thanked 292 Times in 191 Posts
|
I'll add what I can to the above.
My research strongly suggests that the I in the police property marking S.D.I.905. indicated the gun belonged to the Schupo command in Essen. This marking is in accordance with marking instructions issued in 1932. As mentioned, the 1920 stamp indicates the gun had been re-issued to the police by that date. The front grip strap shows evidence (remnant periods) that an earlier marking was ground off before the current one was applied. This was probably a marking for the same police unit but conforming to instructions issued in 1922. The pistol definitely did not have a Walther (mag) safety added and one of the photos seems to show that there is no Schiwy (sear) safety. As stated above, this indicates the gun was issued to a barracked Bereitschaftspolizei unit that was taken into the military in 1934-35. This suggests the gun served in the army during WWII. I'm puzzled by the C/G on the chamber. This stamp is found on a number of Lugers that were issued to police in the mid=1920s but I have never seen it in this location. It appears to have been stamped after the 1920 but I may be wrong. It may indicate reworking of some sort in the mid-20s for the police. I hope this helps a bit.
__________________
Regards, Don donmaus1@aol.com Author of History Writ in Steel: German Police Markings 1900-1936 http://www.historywritinsteel.com |
11-09-2015, 09:44 PM | #13 |
User
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: near Charlotte NC
Posts: 4,677
Thanks: 1,439
Thanked 4,347 Times in 2,038 Posts
|
Don,
thanks for your observations; I'm sure the C/G is over the 1920-due to the way the metal is pushed into the "9" and not the other way. These C/G marked Police lugers are interesting to me and I have gathered a few pictures and numbers and unit markings; I'll start a new thread so as not to hi-jack this one. |
11-09-2015, 10:33 PM | #14 |
Super Moderator
Eternal Lifer LugerForum Patron Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: North of Spokane, WA
Posts: 15,909
Thanks: 1,986
Thanked 4,500 Times in 2,076 Posts
|
|
11-09-2015, 11:12 PM | #15 |
User
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: near Charlotte NC
Posts: 4,677
Thanks: 1,439
Thanked 4,347 Times in 2,038 Posts
|
You(or maybe Dwight) wrote it in Police lugers, p-14:
Illustrated Crown/partial G to left, then: "The earliest military proof mark found on commercial lugers rebarreled to 9mm for police use is a Fraktur letter G surmounted by an abbreviated crown. These are found in addition to the c/n on the left receiver and underneath the barrel. Occasionally they are found on the right receiver of repaired surplus P08s." Perhaps I should have quoted the entire two sentences, but I thought I had the jist of it. I realize this is not a commercial luger rebarreled to 9mm, but it surely seems to be the same partial Crown over G. Wrong? I started this thread on the other forum, because I can never remember where I am! http://luger.gunboards.com/showthrea...770#post298770 |
11-10-2015, 04:15 PM | #16 |
User
Join Date: Nov 2015
Posts: 9
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Thank you again gentlemen. Very glad to have something to add to the narrative which (to me) makes the pistol more unique/interesting. The owner has told me stories of carrying this gun under the front seat of his car for self defense shortly after the Korean war ended and generally mistreating it over the years but adding a bit of color to its past. You've been more than generous with your knowledge and I again thank you for your time.
|
11-10-2015, 05:50 PM | #17 |
User
Join Date: Nov 2015
Posts: 9
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Can someone tell me what the under-case "i" or "l" stamp on the underside of the barrel means, please?
|
11-10-2015, 05:59 PM | #18 | |
User
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: near Charlotte NC
Posts: 4,677
Thanks: 1,439
Thanked 4,347 Times in 2,038 Posts
|
Quote:
Each year started with 1 for military lugers, went to 10000 without a suffix, then 1 to 10000 with "a", and so on down to "i" and in large production years even farther. If the number/letter on the barrel is not the same as the number/letter on the front of the frame, it is mis-matched. Small parts had only the last 2 digits of the number. But then not all barrels had the suffix stamped, and some didn't even have the number applied. Maybe you really should buy a book or read a lot of the old threads here. Start with the stickys, there is a good one for newcomers to the luger forum, they are at the top of the list of sub forums or in the New collector forum. |
|
The following member says Thank You to DonVoigt for your post: |
11-11-2015, 04:12 AM | #19 |
User
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Somewhere in Northern Italy
Posts: 2,646
Thanks: 1,082
Thanked 1,783 Times in 1,007 Posts
|
If you browse through this site you'll find plenty of basic useful informations.
__________________
"Originality can't be restored and should be at the top of any collector's priority list. |
The following member says Thank You to Sergio Natali for your post: |
11-12-2015, 01:45 PM | #20 |
User
Join Date: Nov 2015
Posts: 9
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
As stated above, all marks are matching. Though there are several pictures on this site and elsewhere on the net showing this mark, there is no definitive data explaining whether it is a n "i," and "l," or something else. If I understand the cycle correctly, if the mark is an "i" it would make the gun 2831 of 100,000 for the production year. According to another source, DWM made almost 1M of the gun. As I stated earlier, I'm trying to put this gun in a narrative context before I give it back to it's owner before Christmas. Consequently, I'd rather not guess at an interpretation and would defer to your expert knowledge before risking misinforming the owner due to my inexperience. Thank you for the suggestions.
|
|
|