LugerForum Discussion Forums my profile | register | faq | search
upload photo | donate | calendar

Go Back   LugerForum Discussion Forums > General Discussion Forums > Repairs, Restoration & Refinishing

Reply
Thread Tools Display Modes
Unread 02-16-2019, 10:37 AM   #1
SteveM
User
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Texas
Posts: 1,016
Thanks: 94
Thanked 275 Times in 137 Posts
Default 7.65mm Luger specs

What is the optimal barrel length and twist for the 7.65mm Luger? Does anyone know why the barrel length of 11.75 inches was used on the carbines?
SteveM is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 02-16-2019, 11:05 AM   #2
Sieger
User
 
Sieger's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: New York, NY
Posts: 1,575
Thanks: 2,124
Thanked 400 Times in 249 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by SteveM View Post
What is the optimal barrel length and twist for the 7.65mm Luger? Does anyone know why the barrel length of 11.75 inches was used on the carbines?
Steve,

Are you planning on building a new 7.65 Luger, as several of our board members have done this.

Sieger
Sieger is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 02-16-2019, 11:13 AM   #3
mrerick
Super Moderator - Patron
LugerForum
Life Patron
 
mrerick's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Eastern North Carolina, USA
Posts: 3,900
Thanks: 1,370
Thanked 3,094 Times in 1,503 Posts
Default

Barrel length is a balance between utility, power and accuracy. That is why you see different lengths used.

The longer the barrel length, the higher the potential velocity a given bullet weight and powder load will achieve. It's simply because the high pressure expanding against the back of the bullet spends more time accelerating it.

At the time that Lugers were engineered, instrumentation for measuring the high pressure and velocities, including terminal velocity and energy dissipation, were pretty crude and empirical in nature.

Starting on page 230, the red Sturgess book discusses development of the Luger Carbine, including the history of pistol carbines to that point and issues relating to barrel length. Luger prototype pistols had a range of barrel lengths, presumably for use in testing. A table on page 315-316 shows a large number of experimental lengths.

Ultimately, selection of the barrel length was a compromise between utility / carrying convenience and ballistic performance. Each military commission had it's own priorities. Eventually things settled down to standards.
__________________
Igitur si vis pacem, para bellum -
- Therefore if you want peace, prepare for war.
mrerick is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 02-16-2019, 12:50 PM   #4
Lugerdoc
Patron
LugerForum
Patron
 
Lugerdoc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: POB 398 St.Charles,MO. 63302
Posts: 5,089
Thanks: 6
Thanked 736 Times in 483 Posts
Default

Steve, Just remember that the German engineers were not measuring in inches. The standard 4" military 9mm barrels were actually 100mms, Navy 150mm, Artillery 200mm and carbine 400mm. So probably none of these even measurements are optimum for either caliber, but up to a certain point, the longer the barrel, the higher the exit muzzle velosipy with a standard power charge. TH
__________________
Tom Heller POB 398 ST.Charles, MO. 63302
Tel 636-447-3006 lugerdoc@charter.net
Lugerdoc is offline   Reply With Quote
The following member says Thank You to Lugerdoc for your post:
Unread 02-16-2019, 01:43 PM   #5
SteveM
User
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Texas
Posts: 1,016
Thanks: 94
Thanked 275 Times in 137 Posts
Default

I understand that length in most cases will equal a higher velocity. I was just wondering what the optimal length would be for this caliber. And yes, I know that barrel length was measured in mm's. Sooo, why was the carbine barrel length approximately 300mm long? Was this length chosen just because or was there a specific reason for a barrel around 300mm long?

Lugerdoc, isn't 400mm almost 16"? I was sure that the carbines were closer to 300mm.
SteveM is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 02-16-2019, 02:00 PM   #6
Rick W.
User
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Posts: 339
Thanks: 81
Thanked 359 Times in 198 Posts
Default

I wonder if the 11 inch came from an input from the Kaiser?. In those days, whatever the Kaiser wanted, he got...............probably not the real reason..... Just kidding.........

Lots of variables would be considered in your query. Powders all have their own burn rate. Fast powders like Bullseye are used in small capacity, short barreled pieces some. Slower powders like 2400, really take time to get up to steam sorta speak, hence the longer barrel usually. Not to say that 2400 could not be used in a 2 inch revolver, but the daisies in front would have some burn marks; if that matters at all.

We recently in the last decade or so have some new unique powders. Lower pressures, more speed in projectile stuff, mostly proprietary. I think Lil Gun was one of the first that I noticed, and was kinda funky in the beginning of its tenure, but seems to have mellowed out now.

bullet weight...........heavier......is slower usually. Lighter is faster, but has its own issues.

I suspect, an just a wild guess, that the max velocity with a slow powder, light bullet............would be in a rifle length barrel. There is always some powder that burns in the air. With a slow powder, short barrel, a lot of the flash is from powder burning in the air; rather than in the barrel.........remember burn time characteristic.

Now that everyone but me owns a chrony, an interested person could take a barrel to a action, then chop an inch off ever so often after recording info............kinda expensive even with take off barrels, and a heck of a bunch of work. Even then, only the specific details of the ammo, and barrel would be in play............might be different some next time or if you used different components.

So your query is not an easy one............just too many parameters not specified or if they were, still a lot of effort for anything close to meaningful in my eyes.

So few guns today in 30 Luger. Mostly with pistol length barrels, say 4, 6, maybe 8. I own a 14, but never put it on a chrony, most ranges will not allow them here........the chrony on shooting line.

I like the old 30 Luger and its wildcats, just fun stuff.

mm to inches................25.4 is your friend.
Rick W. is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 02-16-2019, 02:28 PM   #7
SteveM
User
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Texas
Posts: 1,016
Thanks: 94
Thanked 275 Times in 137 Posts
Default

Rick W., yes there are lots of variables. I should have specified that factory loaded ammo would be the flavor of the day and I realize that all brands are not the same; some have more oomph than others.

And yes, 25.4 is your friend!
SteveM is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 02-16-2019, 02:45 PM   #8
DonVoigt
User
 
DonVoigt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: near Charlotte NC
Posts: 4,674
Thanks: 1,435
Thanked 4,341 Times in 2,036 Posts
Default

I do believe the answer is :
"no one knows".

Without testing, I would "guess" that a 12" or there about .30 luger barrel gets practically all of the velocity achievable; there is a point at which a longer barrel actually slows the velocity of a projectile- I have no idea what that length is either. JMHO.

I can tell you from first hand experience that a built .30 luger carbine will not function with a 16" barrel(too heavy) but will with the 12" barrel; however, a 16" 9mm barrel on the same lower will function as it should. So with that info and a cup of coffee you can theorize some more.
__________________
03man(Don Voigt); Luger student and collector.
Looking for DWM side plate: 69 ; Dreyse 1907 pistol K.S. Gendarmerie
DonVoigt is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 02-16-2019, 03:17 PM   #9
Vlim
Moderator
Lifetime
LugerForum Patron
 
Vlim's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Europe
Posts: 5,015
Thanks: 1,014
Thanked 3,809 Times in 1,171 Posts
Default

.30 luger factory twist was 1:250mm.
Attached Thumbnails
Click image for larger version

Name:	NWM_765_demo01.jpg
Views:	12
Size:	91.4 KB
ID:	75787  

Vlim is offline   Reply With Quote
The following 3 members says Thank You to Vlim for your post:
Unread 02-16-2019, 03:36 PM   #10
SteveM
User
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Texas
Posts: 1,016
Thanks: 94
Thanked 275 Times in 137 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by DonVoigt View Post
I do believe the answer is :
"no one knows".

Without testing, I would "guess" that a 12" or there about .30 luger barrel gets practically all of the velocity achievable; there is a point at which a longer barrel actually slows the velocity of a projectile- I have no idea what that length is either. JMHO.

I can tell you from first hand experience that a built .30 luger carbine will not function with a 16" barrel(too heavy) but will with the 12" barrel; however, a 16" 9mm barrel on the same lower will function as it should. So with that info and a cup of coffee you can theorize some more.
Thanks Don for your input, I was guessing somewhere around 11-12 inches.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Vlim View Post
.30 luger factory twist was 1:250mm.
..or 1 in 9.84252 inches. Thanks Vlim.
SteveM is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 02-16-2019, 04:27 PM   #11
mrerick
Super Moderator - Patron
LugerForum
Life Patron
 
mrerick's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Eastern North Carolina, USA
Posts: 3,900
Thanks: 1,370
Thanked 3,094 Times in 1,503 Posts
Default

The original Luger carbines also used a different version cartridge with a larger powder charge. They did not use the pistol cartridge.

The Carbine cartridges were designated "DWM 471a for Selfloading Caribine" and had a black body. The headstamp was "K DWM 471 K" After WW-I "K DWM 471A K". They had .4 gram of powder.

Smokeless powder in 1900 was also not the same as today's powder.
__________________
Igitur si vis pacem, para bellum -
- Therefore if you want peace, prepare for war.
mrerick is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 02-16-2019, 04:55 PM   #12
SteveM
User
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Texas
Posts: 1,016
Thanks: 94
Thanked 275 Times in 137 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by mrerick View Post
The original Luger carbines also used a different version cartridge with a larger powder charge. They did not use the pistol cartridge.

The Carbine cartridges were designated "DWM 471a for Selfloading Caribine" and had a black body. The headstamp was "K DWM 471 K" After WW-I "K DWM 471A K". They had .4 gram of powder.

Smokeless powder in 1900 was also not the same as today's powder.
Been looking for a box of carbine ammunition for years, that stuff is as rare as hens teeth. And yes, powder today isn't the same as the powder was at the beginning of the last century. Dang, that's a long time ago.
SteveM is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 02-17-2019, 11:10 PM   #13
LU1900
User
 
LU1900's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: FRANCE
Posts: 900
Thanks: 31
Thanked 460 Times in 193 Posts
Default

Here few from my own collection :
/
Attached Thumbnails
Click image for larger version

Name:	afive.jpg
Views:	14
Size:	167.5 KB
ID:	75796  

__________________
Best regards from France...Patrice
https://www.fichier-pdf.fr/2016/03/1...nd-snail-drum/
LU1900 is offline   Reply With Quote
The following 6 members says Thank You to LU1900 for your post:
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:04 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 1998 - 2023, Lugerforum.com