my profile |
register |
faq |
search upload photo | donate | calendar |
05-25-2020, 12:15 PM | #1 |
User
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: New York, NY
Posts: 1,575
Thanks: 2,124
Thanked 400 Times in 249 Posts
|
New Army 9mm Ammo Specs
Hi All,
Well, the specs are out on the U.S. Army's new 9mm pistol ammunition. Please see Shooting Times, July 2020, page 59 for the details. Manufactured by Winchester, the civilian release is being sold under the name "Active Duty". Its 115 grain, FMJ-FP bullet, harkens back to the original truncated cone, D.W.M. designed, Parabellum bullet, as used by the German Army of WWI. Velocity was measured, 12 feet from the muzzle, as shot through a 4inch barrel, at an amazing 1,296 fps.! This represents a 20.4% overload as compared to original German Army issue 123 grain truncated cone ammo. (1,296 divided by 1,076 equals 1.204). I like Winchester's bullet design that looks almost identical to some of their 130 grainers I have very successfully and very accurately handloaded in Lugers in the past. Midway, U.S.A. appears to be selling these 115 grain Flat Point bullets for handloading as well. Because of the overload discussed above... FIRE THIS AMMO IN LUGERS AT YOUR OWN RISK!!! Sieger Last edited by Sieger; 05-25-2020 at 01:10 PM. |
The following 8 members says Thank You to Sieger for your post: |
05-25-2020, 01:24 PM | #2 | |
User
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Byron, Georgia
Posts: 1,694
Thanks: 792
Thanked 1,676 Times in 550 Posts
|
Quote:
For sometime now I've been using the Berry's plated 115 grain FBFN bullet (truncated cone like the original Luger bullet) over 5.6 grains of CFE Pistol powder with outstanding results. My Lugers love that load and it also works well in my other 9mm handguns including my Stribog. |
|
The following member says Thank You to Doubs for your post: |
05-25-2020, 02:03 PM | #3 | |
User
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: New York, NY
Posts: 1,575
Thanks: 2,124
Thanked 400 Times in 249 Posts
|
Quote:
At that velocity, Winchester must be loading enriched uranium instead of pistol powder! Ha! Sieger |
|
The following member says Thank You to Sieger for your post: |
05-25-2020, 03:00 PM | #4 |
Lifer X5
Lifetime Forum Patron Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: texas
Posts: 708
Thanks: 87
Thanked 522 Times in 201 Posts
|
is this stuff going to be sitting on the shelf mixed in with our regular loads ?
got a picture of the box ? don't want anything to do with it................ |
The following member says Thank You to tomaustin for your post: |
05-25-2020, 03:14 PM | #5 |
Lifetime Forum
Patron Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: Fairbanks, Alaska. Home of the best moose.
Posts: 655
Thanks: 357
Thanked 1,174 Times in 392 Posts
|
From the Winchester ammo website. Probably a reliable source of info on Winchester ammo. But who knows?https://winchester.com/Products/Ammu...Duty-/WIN9MHSC
|
The following member says Thank You to gunbugs for your post: |
05-25-2020, 07:45 PM | #6 |
Super Moderator - Patron
LugerForum Life Patron Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Eastern North Carolina, USA
Posts: 3,907
Thanks: 1,374
Thanked 3,108 Times in 1,509 Posts
|
Assuming that they use their own components and powder, you can look up all the powders that Winchester offers on the Hodgdon site.
https://www.hodgdonreloading.com/data/pistol None of these powders at their max load approach 1,300 FPS in a 115gn projectile. This is more of a sub-machine gun load than a pistol load. Similar to "NATO" power... They quote pressure 15% higher than standard velocity 9mm Luger for this new round. NATO 9mm develops 36,500PSI pressure. Normal 9mm is 34,100 PSI (CIP standards). Reference to the SAAMI standards show that this round is above _+P loadings... https://saami.org/wp-content/uploads...sting-Copy.pdf Here's the Winchester site for the round with a picture of the box: https://winchester.com/Products/Ammu...uty-/WIN9MHSCL And discussion of the new M1152 round: https://www.guns.com/news/2019/11/12...ctive-duty-9mm
__________________
Igitur si vis pacem, para bellum - - Therefore if you want peace, prepare for war. |
The following member says Thank You to mrerick for your post: |
05-25-2020, 10:04 PM | #7 |
Lifetime Forum
Patron Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: Fairbanks, Alaska. Home of the best moose.
Posts: 655
Thanks: 357
Thanked 1,174 Times in 392 Posts
|
Most, if not all of the major ammunition manufacturers do not use the commonly available "cannister" powders. They buy bulk lots from the powder makers, and tailor the loads to what powder they have bought. They can specify a certain type, ball, flake, extruded, with a preferred burning rate, but will have to "work up" a load depending on the particular characteristics of the powder received. In a nutshell, they aren't using the powders we use. The cannister powders we buy are kept to very tight specifications, so if we buy a pound of Reloader 15 today, and another pound of Reloader 15 five years from now, it'll be very close to the same. The ammo makers don't buy 100 pounds at a time, they buy a ton or 2 at a time. They are oftentimes using powders we can't get.
On a side note, years ago when I was shooting IPSC, I was using a S&W 559 9mm. (Held more bullets, you know). I was loading 6.2 gr of Unique and a magnum primer with a Speer 125 gr JSP, and getting 1270fps over a chronograph. It made "major" on the IPSC power scale. I'm pretty sure it would beat up most guns, but the old S&W just ate that stuff up. It was the 9mm load that would clear a bowling pin off the table. I shot thousands of rounds through that gun, still have it today. |
05-26-2020, 02:10 PM | #8 |
Super Moderator - Patron
LugerForum Life Patron Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Eastern North Carolina, USA
Posts: 3,907
Thanks: 1,374
Thanked 3,108 Times in 1,509 Posts
|
Is there a source for the information about Winchester's usage of specific powders in commercial loaded rounds?
I teach classes on reloading, and would like to incorporate such information. This group has published a database of powder characteristics - for example: https://ilrc.ucf.edu/powders/index.php They list only one OEM loading powder (a Remmington powder) and no Military powders for some reason. Here's the sample detail on HP-38 ; https://ilrc.ucf.edu/powders/sample_...p?powder_id=82 Here's Winchester 231: https://ilrc.ucf.edu/powders/sample_...?powder_id=397 It's a reasonably comprehensive powder characteristic database, and yet the powders listed are generally ones available commercially to reloaders. It's designed for forensic identification of powders found at a scene, so I wouldn't think they would limit it to just reloading powder (since we produce the vast minority of ammunition compared to OEM manufacture). I'm trying to understand why Winchester would create a special powder just for their own internal usage, and yet it not be listed on this analysis database - which appears pretty comprehensive.
__________________
Igitur si vis pacem, para bellum - - Therefore if you want peace, prepare for war. |
The following member says Thank You to mrerick for your post: |
05-26-2020, 02:32 PM | #9 |
Lifetime Forum
Patron Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: Fairbanks, Alaska. Home of the best moose.
Posts: 655
Thanks: 357
Thanked 1,174 Times in 392 Posts
|
I would presume, from the introduction to the database, that they are limiting their analysis to commonly available reloading powders. The database is primarily used to analyze residue from IED's, not from residue from gunshot wounds. Again, the powders used by the factories may, or may not be commonly available. Lot to lot variations in bulk powder preclude use by handloaders seeking consistent results from various lots. Sometimes you will see bulk powders available for sale as "surplus" from pulldown ammunition, and they will tell you to cross-reference with a certain powder, but start loads must be "x" percent lower.
|
The following member says Thank You to gunbugs for your post: |
05-26-2020, 05:36 PM | #11 |
User
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: near Charlotte NC
Posts: 4,681
Thanks: 1,441
Thanked 4,350 Times in 2,040 Posts
|
It is sold as training ammo, as opposed to target or self defense;
i.e. "marketing".
__________________
03man(Don Voigt); Luger student and collector. Looking for DWM side plate: 69 ; Dreyse 1907 pistol K.S. Gendarmerie |
The following member says Thank You to DonVoigt for your post: |
05-26-2020, 05:47 PM | #12 | |
User
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: New York, NY
Posts: 1,575
Thanks: 2,124
Thanked 400 Times in 249 Posts
|
Quote:
I have read that Winchester uses, what is commercially called, Power Pistol (an Alliant Powder) to load its regular NATO Spec ammunition. As stated above, it's probably delivered to them as a bulk type powder vs a commercial canister powder. Sieger |
|
05-27-2020, 04:14 PM | #13 | |
User
Join Date: Jun 2002
Posts: 757
Thanks: 0
Thanked 212 Times in 101 Posts
|
Quote:
Caveat 1: There is really no such thing as “sub-machinegun ammunition”, as such. Sub-machineguns are just fully automatic firearms that fire a pistol cartridge. Countries that field sub-machineguns and pistols don’t have different types of cartridges for each. Caveat 2: There is no such thing as a single NATO standard 9x19 load. Different NATO signatories load their ammunition (pistol or rifle) to whatever standards they feel best meets their military goals. Caveat 3: CIP and SAMMI chamber pressures are measured using different methodologies and procedures and cannot be meaningfully compared. Caveat 4: Military ammunition is not subject to commercial laws, is usually made to perform to military standards, and may or may not be pressure tested using commercial policies, procedures or methods. This means that any extant published pressure data for military ammunition is irreconcilable with published pressures for commercial ammunition. Caveat 5: While chamber pressures and muzzle velocities are related, that relationship is neither direct nor linear. Higher chamber pressures don’t always result in higher muzzle velocities. Lower chamber pressures don’t always result in lower muzzle velocities. |
|
10-30-2020, 10:14 PM | #14 | |
User
Join Date: May 2019
Location: Northern Idaho
Posts: 84
Thanks: 2
Thanked 34 Times in 22 Posts
|
Quote:
|
|
10-31-2020, 07:38 AM | #15 |
User
Join Date: Jun 2002
Posts: 757
Thanks: 0
Thanked 212 Times in 101 Posts
|
Exceptions:
Chamber pressure and velocity measurements are always done from a pressure test barrel. Such barrels are usually around ten inches in length. Muzzle velocity and chamber pressures (note plural) are related, but the relationship is not linear. Trying to guess chamber pressures based on muzzle velocity is an unproductive effort. |
10-31-2020, 12:17 PM | #16 |
Lifer X5
Lifetime Forum Patron Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: texas
Posts: 708
Thanks: 87
Thanked 522 Times in 201 Posts
|
firing that in a vintage Luger would be a very poor decision....may not hurt you, but could/would damage your weapon......this ammo is the same problem as in the m1 Garand world where the idiots want to shoot the modern 30.06 ammo in the ww2 weapons and it just tears up the operating rod on the recoil cycle..(the garand guys can change out the gas port and protect their weapons from that problem if they understand the problem)...but without modification to your Luger, and I don't know any, the pressures are just too great....
|
The following member says Thank You to tomaustin for your post: |
10-31-2020, 02:56 PM | #17 | |
User
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: New York, NY
Posts: 1,575
Thanks: 2,124
Thanked 400 Times in 249 Posts
|
Quote:
Respectfully, did you read my quote above? Velocity was tested from a 4 inch barrel, not a 10 inch one. Yes, I agree that muzzle velocity and chamber pressure are related. With a Luger, chamber pressure should not be the real issue, breach block slam should be, however. Again, use this ammo at your own risk in a Luger! Sieger. |
|
11-01-2020, 08:05 AM | #18 | |
User
Join Date: Jun 2002
Posts: 757
Thanks: 0
Thanked 212 Times in 101 Posts
|
Quote:
The source cited is a gun rag. Let's not get too excited over a source that publishes to sell advertisements. |
|
11-01-2020, 11:06 AM | #19 |
User
Join Date: Jun 2002
Posts: 757
Thanks: 0
Thanked 212 Times in 101 Posts
|
|
11-01-2020, 11:57 AM | #20 | |
User
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: New York, NY
Posts: 1,575
Thanks: 2,124
Thanked 400 Times in 249 Posts
|
Quote:
We have been down this road many times before regarding NATO Ammo. Your assertion regarding advertising sales is somewhat illogical to me; as who would they be advertising for, Winchester? Again, SHOOT AT YOUR OWN RISK in a Luger pistol! Sieger Last edited by Sieger; 11-01-2020 at 12:46 PM. |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|