my profile |
register |
faq |
search upload photo | donate | calendar |
12-24-2012, 01:39 PM | #1 |
User
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Arkansas
Posts: 30
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Space between chamber and breach block
You'll have to bear with me on these photos, I took them with my phone. Here you can see the issue.
Relatively clean breach block area. Rear of the chamber where the extractor slides in. I made sure to scrape out any debris (there really was none). You can see that the S-hook is properly engaged in the main spring. (Yes I see the rust. The flash definitely exaggerates it, I have only scrubbed with cotton patches at this point, haven't gotten around to attacking with some steel wool.) There is a little bit of rust in this area. Honestly there isn't enough to cause this. Anyone know what the problem might be? I will be getting after the rust soon, but I'm wondering if there are any lugerforum members in Arkansas, USA that might like to look at the gun in person, if they feel they can help with this issue. |
12-24-2012, 01:52 PM | #2 |
Lifer 2X
Lifetime Forum Patron Join Date: May 2005
Location: Somewhere in Montana
Posts: 2,615
Thanks: 3,140
Thanked 2,523 Times in 940 Posts
|
There is always a space between the breechblock and the chamber. How much seems to vary luger by luger. Does this function ok? I'm not sure you have a problem? The space looks wide but I have some around the same. Bill
__________________
Bill Lyon |
12-24-2012, 02:16 PM | #3 |
User
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Arkansas
Posts: 30
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
I haven't attempted to shoot this gun as I was advised that it may not be safe. Not sure if thats correct or not. I'm mostly worried about what you see in the final picture.
|
12-24-2012, 11:22 PM | #4 |
Lifer 2X
Lifetime Forum Patron Join Date: May 2005
Location: Somewhere in Montana
Posts: 2,615
Thanks: 3,140
Thanked 2,523 Times in 940 Posts
|
Didn't really look at your last picture. Are you sure this was assembled correctly? I agree I wouild not shoot it until someone looks it over. First I would check the assembly. If this is a matching Vickers I would not shoot it anyway. Bill
__________________
Bill Lyon |
12-24-2012, 11:57 PM | #5 |
User
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Arkansas
Posts: 30
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
I will say that I am new to Lugers, as this is the only one I have handled. However, I don't think I have improperly reassembled this gun. Should any decent gunsmith know his way around a Luger well enough to diagnose the problem? I can take it to a gunsmith.
Apart from the magazine, it is an all matching Dutch Vickers. One of the magazines is original and the other is one made later (marked QS). |
12-25-2012, 07:26 AM | #6 |
Moderator
Lifetime LugerForum Patron Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Europe
Posts: 5,034
Thanks: 1,020
Thanked 3,882 Times in 1,186 Posts
|
There is no problem, it's absolutely normal.
Whatever you do: DON'T SHOOT IT. Vickers lugers are rare, parts are numbered and impossible to find correct replacements for. You will turn your $3000+ pistol in a $1000- gun in one go if you are unlucky. If you feel the need to shoot a luger, pick up a shooter grade pistol and play with that instead. Can you post pictures of the magazines? Dutch magazines are unnumbered and there were several variations. |
12-25-2012, 08:02 AM | #7 |
Moderator
2010 LugerForum Patron Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Santa Teresa New Mexico just outside of the West Texas town of El Paso
Posts: 6,987
Thanks: 1,067
Thanked 5,090 Times in 1,675 Posts
|
I also would like to see more photos, magazines and gun. It looks like the ID plate is ?.H XXI/17. Is the letter that precedes the "H" a "R" or "L". Your Vickers Luger was issued to either the "Rignt Half" or the "Left Half" of the 21st Infantry Battalion, weapon number 17. I have a Vickers that was issued to the Left Half of the 21st, weapon number 12!
The "QS" on your magazine is actually a "GS" and indicates that it was made or overhauled at the government arsenal in Indonesia. It is an original and proper replacement magazine for Dutch Lugers. You have a very desirable Luger in nice condition. The recommendation not to fire it should be taken very seriously. Thank you for sharing it with us.
__________________
If it's made after 1918...it's a reproduction |
12-25-2012, 09:45 AM | #8 |
User
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Arkansas
Posts: 30
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
I apologize, I meant to say grips not magazines, not sure how I didn't catch that mistake of mine. As far as I know the one mag that I have is unmarked and has no metal pin in the wood base. And I meant GS, not sure what I was thinking last night haha, musta been the holiday cheer.
|
12-25-2012, 10:00 AM | #9 |
User
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Arkansas
Posts: 30
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
This is "Grandpa's Gun" in the military p08 forum.
|
12-25-2012, 10:29 AM | #10 |
Super Moderator - Patron
LugerForum Life Patron Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Eastern North Carolina, USA
Posts: 3,900
Thanks: 1,372
Thanked 3,094 Times in 1,503 Posts
|
Hi Willyboy,
I echo the recommendation from other members to never fire this Luger. It is a piece of history, and rather rare. Also, use extreme care when stabilizing the rust. It should be stabilized as soon as possible. You'll see discussion about how to gently remove red iron oxide using oiled very fine steel wool. Regardless of the deterioration, never consider refinishing or touching up the bluing or straw. Any of this will considerably reduce the value (historically and financially) of your Luger. Marc
__________________
Igitur si vis pacem, para bellum - - Therefore if you want peace, prepare for war. |
12-25-2012, 11:27 AM | #11 |
Super Moderator - Patron
LugerForum Life Patron Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Eastern North Carolina, USA
Posts: 3,900
Thanks: 1,372
Thanked 3,094 Times in 1,503 Posts
|
I recently helped analyze a pair of cartridge failures that relate to Rick W.'s discussion above.
The 9mm Luger cartridge headspaces on it's case mouth. When the cartridge is fired, it must be properly supported with it's base supported by the breech face and it's sides supported by the chamber walls. Normally, the extractor engages in the rim, and tends to pull the cartridge base up against the breech face. If a 9mm cartridge case is short enough (and out of specs) the cartridge may be pushed too far into the chamber, the extractor not properly engaged in the rim, and a large gap left between the cartridge base and the breech face. I think that this is what happened here (on both a Luger and a p.38). The result can be catastrophic: See post #56 in this thread over on Jan Still's forum: http://luger.gunboards.com/showthrea...oday-!!!/page6 - - - - - - I've always wondered about the variation of space at the breech end of the toggle train in our Lugers, and it's potential for trouble. Marc
__________________
Igitur si vis pacem, para bellum - - Therefore if you want peace, prepare for war. |
12-25-2012, 12:20 PM | #12 | |
User
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Arkansas
Posts: 30
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Quote:
|
|
12-25-2012, 03:49 PM | #13 | |
Twice a Lifer
Lifetime Forum Patron Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Atop the highest hill in Schuyler County NY
Posts: 3,284
Thanks: 7,013
Thanked 2,478 Times in 1,320 Posts
|
Quote:
Case exposure is how much of the brass case is visible?/unsupported by chamber structure. If you had an abnormally shallow chamber, the back end of the shell would hang out. You could still have a headspace within acceptable parameters if the overall length of the toggle train were short enough, by the amount the rim protrudes, but situations of excessive case exposure can be dangerous. The pros have standardized data and measurements available to check against when making these measurements.
__________________
"... Liberty is the seed and soil, the air and light, the dew and rain of progress, love and joy."-- Robert Greene Ingersoll 1894 |
|
12-25-2012, 04:15 PM | #14 |
Moderator
2010 LugerForum Patron Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Santa Teresa New Mexico just outside of the West Texas town of El Paso
Posts: 6,987
Thanks: 1,067
Thanked 5,090 Times in 1,675 Posts
|
Will,
I should have recognized it! I am afraid that I have to blame advancing years rather than too much "holiday cheer" for my memory lapse.
__________________
If it's made after 1918...it's a reproduction |
12-25-2012, 04:39 PM | #15 |
User
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Arkansas
Posts: 30
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Thanks ithicaartist, that was easier to understand.
|
|
|