my profile |
register |
faq |
search upload photo | donate | calendar |
04-26-2005, 01:21 PM | #1 |
User
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Virginia
Posts: 173
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
What is L.A. 1. 23 ?
Thanks.
Tony S. "SEMPER PARATUS" |
04-26-2005, 02:01 PM | #2 |
User
Join Date: Feb 2003
Posts: 176
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
I'm going to take an uneducated guess that it stands for
Landwehr Artillerie Co. 1, 23 pistol issued. I could be wrong and hopefully some of the more knowledgeable Luger experts will chip in shortly. Brent B. |
04-26-2005, 03:44 PM | #3 |
RIP
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Ca.
Posts: 2,141
Thanks: 8
Thanked 89 Times in 54 Posts
|
Does it have a sear and/or mag safety , could this be a police Luger and would translate to Landjagerei Aurich division 1 weapon 23...hope this is of some help.
|
04-26-2005, 04:52 PM | #4 |
Patron
LugerForum Patron Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 1,429
Thanks: 67
Thanked 292 Times in 191 Posts
|
Where is the mark? If it's on the rear grip strap, it should be Imperial Army. If it's on the front, I'm puzzled. The Landj�¤gerei did not mark their weapons with a number for any unit subordinate to the administrative district.
__________________
Regards, Don donmaus1@aol.com Author of History Writ in Steel: German Police Markings 1900-1936 http://www.historywritinsteel.com |
04-26-2005, 05:48 PM | #5 |
User
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Virginia
Posts: 173
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
I am sorry, I should have been more specific. The gun is a Ortgies Pocket Automatic .32 ACP cal, probably around 1926. The mark is on the front grip strap. I was told that it could mean "Feld-Luftschiffe-Abeteilung Nr. 1" which means "Field Airship Unit No. 1 - gun no. 23". But, I am not sure plus I have no written reference to this information. In addition, I was told that "Unit Number One" included the Hindenburg amoung other Zeppelins and Airships.
Thanks for your help, Tony S. |
04-26-2005, 07:24 PM | #6 |
Patron
LugerForum Patron Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 1,429
Thanks: 67
Thanked 292 Times in 191 Posts
|
Tony,
Is it possible that the mark is L.Al.23, where the character after the A is the lower-case letter "l" and there is no period between?
__________________
Regards, Don donmaus1@aol.com Author of History Writ in Steel: German Police Markings 1900-1936 http://www.historywritinsteel.com |
04-26-2005, 09:03 PM | #7 |
User
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Virginia
Posts: 173
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
04-26-2005, 09:31 PM | #8 |
Patron
LugerForum Patron Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 1,429
Thanks: 67
Thanked 292 Times in 191 Posts
|
Well, so much for that idea!
__________________
Regards, Don donmaus1@aol.com Author of History Writ in Steel: German Police Markings 1900-1936 http://www.historywritinsteel.com |
04-26-2005, 10:44 PM | #9 |
User
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Orygun
Posts: 4,243
Thanks: 118
Thanked 245 Times in 150 Posts
|
I think it's a police unit mark. Landj�¤gerei Aurich , which was marked, not to regulation. with a precinct or department number. The reason being is that the pistols Serial# is stamped on the holster. This was a police , and not usually a Heers or military practice. A military pistol would most likely have the unit mark on the holster instead.
Ron
__________________
I Still Need DWM side plate #49... if anyone runs across a nice one. What ~Rudyard Kipling~ said... |
04-27-2005, 11:19 AM | #10 |
Patron
LugerForum Patron Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 1,429
Thanks: 67
Thanked 292 Times in 191 Posts
|
Ron,
You are probably right that it's a police mark but I seriously doubt that it's Landj�¤gerei. I have an article coming out in the May Auto Mag in which I've analyzed about 150 Landj�¤gerei marks and none of them have a number for the Inspectorate (the next level below the administrative district). The analysis also strongly suggests that the Landj�¤gerei did not mark any of their weapons until about 1929. By that time, it appears that many of the Prussian police had abandoned the complex marking format specified in the 1922 marking orders in favor of a simpler system of indicating only the Regierungsbezirk. The data indicate that the small-caliber weapon of choice in the Landj�¤gerei was the Mauser M1914, not the Ortgies. My article also lists three examples of Landj�¤gerei P.08 holsters with the unit mark stamped on them, including one from Aurich. Finally, all the Landj�¤gerei unit marks I've examined consistently use 4-mm capital letters and 2-mm numerals. These numerals are much too large and the 23 is fancier than any I've seen. I suspect that this is not a Prussian police mark and is one of those to be listed as "unidentified."
__________________
Regards, Don donmaus1@aol.com Author of History Writ in Steel: German Police Markings 1900-1936 http://www.historywritinsteel.com |
04-27-2005, 04:25 PM | #11 |
User
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Virginia
Posts: 173
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Thanks for helping and keeping the discussion interesting. I was told to check the Gun Collectors Digest volume 1, in the chart of unit marks, for similar markings and the explanation of its origins. I can not confirm since I do not have a copy of the book. Does anyone have copy of it and can confirm the allege origins?
Thanks, Tony S. |
04-27-2005, 11:45 PM | #12 |
User
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Orygun
Posts: 4,243
Thanks: 118
Thanked 245 Times in 150 Posts
|
Don, I don't disagree that police stamped unit markings on their holsters. However it is kind of unusual to find a military holster with the serial# stamped on it. And no other markings. It's not unheard of, but not common.
Ron
__________________
I Still Need DWM side plate #49... if anyone runs across a nice one. What ~Rudyard Kipling~ said... |
|
|