LugerForum Discussion Forums my profile | register | faq | search
upload photo | donate | calendar

Go Back   LugerForum Discussion Forums > General Discussion Forums > Shooting and Reloading

Reply
Thread Tools Display Modes
Unread 04-16-2017, 01:14 PM   #1
Rupi52
User
 
Rupi52's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Location: Portugal
Posts: 10
Thanks: 4
Thanked 12 Times in 8 Posts
Default Range Report of my byf 1942 shooter

Dear friends :
In my last post I promised to publish results of diferent Vectan BA9 charges for my 08.

here they are now:

First general conclusions:
Testing a lot of charges starting at 4,5 grains powder and going through 6.00, (using S&B sleeves, RWS small pistol primer, an AOL of 1,150 in. and light conique crimp on 115 grs fochi FMJ round nose bullet) the results showed that the increment of 0,1 grains of powder had very few influence in the velocity rate;
that BA9 is quite sensitive to atmosferic conditions ( sunny day 25 º C shots are harder and velocities higher in oposition to dark coller days , 15 to 18 º C).
After all this I notice that this was an hard task to define a nice load to my 08.

Anyway it goes next the charge and average velocity obtained:

5.0 grs = 303.15 m/s (994.59 f/s)
5,1 grs = 327,60 m/s ( 1074, 08 f/s)
5,2 grs = 328,03 m/s ( 1076,21 f/s)
5,4 grs = 329,37 m/s (1080,61 f/s)
5,5 grs = 332,84 m/s ( 1091,99 f/s)

Passing to accuracy performance , lets have just a few results, from the total shooting made handhelded at 25 meters.

5.0 grains BA9
Click image for larger version

Name:	1.jpg
Views:	43
Size:	173.0 KB
ID:	65605

5.5 grains BA9
Click image for larger version

Name:	2017-04-13 09.11.34.jpg
Views:	43
Size:	192.4 KB
ID:	65606

4,6 grains BA9
Click image for larger version

Name:	2017-04-13 09.27.42.jpg
Views:	38
Size:	183.8 KB
ID:	65607

As I noticed that higher charge would spread the shots, decided come down and teste lower charges and got the last target image.
For the moment i´m gona stay at this mild charge and watch how is it gonna do in futur shooting.

Men: this is really a long way to go, yet.

Last edited by Rupi52; 04-23-2017 at 02:46 PM.
Rupi52 is offline   Reply With Quote
The following 2 members says Thank You to Rupi52 for your post:
Unread 04-16-2017, 02:39 PM   #2
rhuff
Patron
LugerForum
Patron
 
rhuff's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Az.
Posts: 2,270
Thanks: 2,686
Thanked 958 Times in 704 Posts
Default

You might just want to consider using a bench rest, or sandbags when shooting for load accuracy. That will remove a good portion of the "human factor". Just a thought. Always glad to see different loads and how they perform.
rhuff is offline   Reply With Quote
The following member says Thank You to rhuff for your post:
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:00 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 1998 - 2024, Lugerforum.com