LugerForum Discussion Forums my profile | register | faq | search
upload photo | donate | calendar

Go Back   LugerForum Discussion Forums > Luger Discussion Forums > All P-08 Military Lugers

Reply
Thread Tools Display Modes
Unread 01-16-2012, 06:11 AM   #1
rob280
User
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Posts: 8
Thanks: 1
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default Luger Take Down Tool

I have a 1939 Mauser 42 code Luger, what markings should be on an original take down tool. I am looking for an original tool. Also, I have another original take down tool that has a crown with a number 3 below it. I think it is for a WW1 Luger, correct me if I am wrong.
rob280 is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 01-16-2012, 09:29 AM   #2
Norme
Always A
Lifetime Forum
Patron
 
Norme's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Colorado
Posts: 2,417
Thanks: 226
Thanked 2,603 Times in 933 Posts
Default

Hi Rob, Your 1939 42 Mauser has two stick eagle/655 inspection marks on it's left receiver, like the one shown. The tool should have the same mark. Regard, Norm
Attached Thumbnails
Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_1851.jpg
Views:	55
Size:	83.3 KB
ID:	23618  

Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_1693.jpg
Views:	55
Size:	34.1 KB
ID:	23619  

Norme is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 01-17-2012, 02:29 AM   #3
MFC
User
 
MFC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Louisiana
Posts: 1,237
Thanks: 183
Thanked 281 Times in 162 Posts
Default

Doug,
Sorry to disagree but, this is the way I understand it...
The 'Crown/gothic letter' is a military acceptance stamp. Different stamps, with the first letter of the inspectors last name, were assigned to each individual inspector. Many different letters can be found on WWI tools.
WWII military tools should have an acceptance stamp.
There are a few WWII era unmarked commercial tools but, would not be correct for a military rig.
Most unmarked tools are DWM (the shape is different) and are correct with military or commercial rigs.

Robert,
You probably have a C/Z marked tool.
Attached Images
 
__________________
Mike C.

Last edited by MFC; 01-17-2012 at 03:43 AM.
MFC is offline   Reply With Quote
The following member says Thank You to MFC for your post:
Unread 01-17-2012, 07:46 AM   #4
regul
Patron
LugerForum
Patron
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: VA
Posts: 96
Thanks: 19
Thanked 57 Times in 20 Posts
Default DWM Crown Z

Rob280
I have attached a picture of a DWM Crown Z accepted tool for comparison.
Thanks
Ed
Attached Thumbnails
Click image for larger version

Name:	100_0438.jpg
Views:	46
Size:	177.5 KB
ID:	23628  

Click image for larger version

Name:	100_0440.jpg
Views:	44
Size:	123.4 KB
ID:	23629  

Click image for larger version

Name:	100_0441.jpg
Views:	47
Size:	160.8 KB
ID:	23630  

regul is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 01-17-2012, 10:18 AM   #5
alanint
User
 
alanint's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Marco Island, Florida
Posts: 4,867
Thanks: 1,685
Thanked 1,916 Times in 1,192 Posts
Default

Mike is right.

I vapor locked while typing, as I was thinking of something else. It is a Crown/Z tool.

Sorry for the confusion.
alanint is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 01-17-2012, 10:20 AM   #6
klaus 3338
User
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Germany
Posts: 517
Thanks: 0
Thanked 411 Times in 160 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by MFC View Post
Doug,
Sorry to disagree but, this is the way I understand it...
The 'Crown/gothic letter' is a military acceptance stamp. Different stamps, with the first letter of the inspectors last name, were assigned to each individual inspector. Many different letters can be found on WWI tools.
WWII military tools should have an acceptance stamp.
There are a few WWII era unmarked commercial tools but, would not be correct for a military rig.
Most unmarked tools are DWM (the shape is different) and are correct with military or commercial rigs.

Robert,
You probably have a C/Z marked tool.
Let me try to explain the differences of the tools during the time with my "I know 100 words English".

You are right that the gothic letters during the Imperial time are the first letter of the inspector’s last name. But these tools came in 1910 according the 1910 dated stamping order and were stopped in 1919 when Germany was a Republic. All tools before 1910 were without the acceptance marks and these tools are rare!- Much rarer than these with the acceptance.

The military III. Reich tools have the eagle/ 63, 655 and 135 acceptance marks (K-and G date Luger have usually other acceptance) and the stamps are for an "Abnahmebeamten" which have military ranks. Don Hallock and Joop van de Kant wrote their names the first time in their book "The Mauser Parabellum". The III Reich tools without acceptance were for example issued to the byf Luger which went to Portugal in 1943.

I think Norm is right: the 655 tool is correct for the 1939 Luger.
And MFC is correct that the Imperial tool is the C/Z for the DWM first issue and the other early Lugers with this acceptance.

Dave Lindsay offers a 52 pages article about tools on Jan´s site.

Last edited by klaus 3338; 01-18-2012 at 12:11 PM.
klaus 3338 is offline   Reply With Quote
The following member says Thank You to klaus 3338 for your post:
Unread 01-18-2012, 02:30 AM   #7
wolfganggo
User
 
wolfganggo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: near vienna
Posts: 93
Thanks: 1
Thanked 81 Times in 18 Posts
Default

Quote:
Dave Lindsay offers a 52 pages article about tools on Jan´s site.
could you pls post a link to this artikle ..... thx

wolfganggo, from austria.......
wolfganggo is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 01-18-2012, 12:10 PM   #8
klaus 3338
User
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Germany
Posts: 517
Thanks: 0
Thanked 411 Times in 160 Posts
Default

Hallo Wolfgang,
eine kleinere in Deutsch verfasste Version kann hier eingesehen werden:
http://militaria-fundforum.de./showthread.php?t=243112
Gruß Klaus
klaus 3338 is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 01-18-2012, 01:19 PM   #9
A.Mifsin
User
 
A.Mifsin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Malta
Posts: 570
Thanks: 74
Thanked 12 Times in 12 Posts
Default

Thank You Klaus, but it is in German, (I think.) Is there a way that we can get this article in English, from the looks of it, it is a very useful information to read.
Alf.
__________________
I prefer a Luger
A.Mifsin is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 01-18-2012, 05:06 PM   #10
MaplebayDave
User
 
MaplebayDave's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Milwaukee, WI
Posts: 5
Thanks: 1
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Default Interested in your Crown-Z takedown tool

Rob280,

If you are successful in finding an original takedown tool appropriate to the era of your P.08, and find you no longer need the WWI era tool, I would be interested in it. This past weekend, I acquired a DWM made in 1918 - just a gun, with no holster or takedown tool, and I would like to have an appropriate tool to go with it. Thanks for your consideration.

Dave
__________________
"Those who live by the sword will eventually succumb to those who use guns." - Dave
MaplebayDave is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 01-19-2012, 01:21 AM   #11
MFC
User
 
MFC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Louisiana
Posts: 1,237
Thanks: 183
Thanked 281 Times in 162 Posts
Default

Dave Lindsay posted this on Jan Still's Forum...


"If any one is interested Klaus and I put together photos of the acceptance marks for the known DWM and Erfurt loading tools. If anyone is interested in a copy (about 4 pages) I would be most happy to email them to you. No cost. All I need is your email address. The best to you. Dave L. lindsay125@saintmarieswireless.com "
__________________
Mike C.
MFC is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:58 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 1998 - 2024, Lugerforum.com