my profile |
register |
faq |
search upload photo | donate | calendar |
04-09-2020, 11:29 AM | #1 |
User
Join Date: Apr 2020
Posts: 58
Thanks: 80
Thanked 28 Times in 12 Posts
|
Help identify: Luger 1906 Commercial 9mm
Hi guys!
I am new to this forum and also to owning old guns. Always was a fan of modern ones (except always wanted 1911 from 20-30s) Few days ago I've bought my first Luger without prior "home work"... That was an impulse buy as I liked it (And bought it for less than what I see on GunBroker) So after I examined it what I found: Early 1906 Commercial BUG proofed 9mm (should be made 1906-1907?) Serial numbers: bottom of the barrel(full) - OK front of the frame(full) - OK breechblock (lower left side) - OK extractor (bottom) - OK front toggle link (bottom) - OK rear toggle link (back) - OK receiver(rear) - OK side plate (bottom edge) - OK takedown lever (bottom) - OK trigger (top left) - OK grip safety (under grip) - OK magazine(NO serial) - OK All proof marks seems on place. So I ask for your help to check it and also opinion what to do next? : 1. It is fake/ it is dead - make a good shooter from it as it has no any value(change barrel) 2. Good enough sample, pretty scarce. Just clean it and keep it. 3. Between dead and collectible - restore it. 4. Your option Also in your opinion how much it worth? I don't plan to sell it but rather want to understand if I paid too much Thank you! Last edited by briskspirit; 09-21-2020 at 11:14 AM. |
The following 3 members says Thank You to briskspirit for your post: |
04-09-2020, 11:30 AM | #2 |
User
Join Date: Apr 2020
Posts: 58
Thanks: 80
Thanked 28 Times in 12 Posts
|
Few more photos:
Last edited by briskspirit; 09-21-2020 at 11:15 AM. |
The following 3 members says Thank You to briskspirit for your post: |
04-09-2020, 01:10 PM | #3 |
User
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Portland, Oregon
Posts: 3,903
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1,320 Times in 432 Posts
|
Sn 49491 is 10,000 numbers past the beginning of commercial P08 production, so likely dates from late-1909--early-1910. Definitely refinished, certainly adequate for shooting. Replacing the barrel on an all-matching Luger is a controversial act. Shoot it, you might find that it is more accurate than the barrel condition would lead you to believe.
--Dwight |
The following 3 members says Thank You to Dwight Gruber for your post: |
04-09-2020, 02:45 PM | #4 |
User
Join Date: Jan 2017
Location: S.E. Iowa
Posts: 484
Thanks: 533
Thanked 227 Times in 124 Posts
|
I've owned a 9mm luger with a really bad case of frosted bore. But, it was very accurate!
__________________
I Build Custom Pistol Boxes |
The following member says Thank You to Major Tom for your post: |
04-09-2020, 03:40 PM | #5 | |
User
Join Date: Apr 2020
Posts: 58
Thanks: 80
Thanked 28 Times in 12 Posts
|
Quote:
And also I thought that later BUG was changed for BU only. Last edited by briskspirit; 04-09-2020 at 04:55 PM. |
|
04-09-2020, 06:34 PM | #6 |
User
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Portland, Oregon
Posts: 3,903
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1,320 Times in 432 Posts
|
|
04-09-2020, 07:09 PM | #7 |
Moderator
2010 LugerForum Patron Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Santa Teresa New Mexico just outside of the West Texas town of El Paso
Posts: 7,022
Thanks: 1,090
Thanked 5,180 Times in 1,703 Posts
|
"Luger" is John Walter's book.
Ron
__________________
If it's made after 1918...it's a reproduction |
The following member says Thank You to Ron Wood for your post: |
04-09-2020, 08:32 PM | #8 |
User
Join Date: Apr 2020
Posts: 58
Thanks: 80
Thanked 28 Times in 12 Posts
|
Standard Catalog of Luger by Aarron Davis
Quote from the book: QUANTITY MADE 3,500 to 4,000 in 9mm Parabellum SERIAL NUMBER RANGE: 25050 to 69000. Some combination of this set of marks was used on commercial Luger production starting in 1900 and proceeding through the 1906 pattern guns. The crown/B and crown/U indicated the actual proof, while the crown/G is thought to indicate a rifled barrel. Later the crown/G was dropped, with the other two marks being applied sideways Also here (lugerforum.com) there is a proof mark page with the same info about BUG and BU. That's why I thought it should be one of the early productions. P.S.: With all respect I am not arguing, I am trying to understand As I am getting obsessed with Lugers now and reading about each proof mark - so interesting! |
04-09-2020, 08:40 PM | #9 |
User
Join Date: Apr 2020
Posts: 58
Thanks: 80
Thanked 28 Times in 12 Posts
|
Gathering opinions on what should I do with that rust? CLP oil + 0000 steel wool? Or something heavier?
How do you think what it's worth? (Prior to corona virus ) What would you do if you've got that particular gun? |
04-10-2020, 12:37 AM | #10 |
Patron
LugerForum Patron Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 4,047
Thanks: 578
Thanked 1,414 Times in 887 Posts
|
Are you certain that the grooves in the barrel are not simply full of lead stripped off of passing lead bullets.
dju |
The following member says Thank You to DavidJayUden for your post: |
04-10-2020, 12:39 AM | #11 |
User
Join Date: Apr 2020
Posts: 58
Thanks: 80
Thanked 28 Times in 12 Posts
|
|
04-10-2020, 02:42 AM | #12 | |
User
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Byron, Georgia
Posts: 1,700
Thanks: 792
Thanked 1,696 Times in 556 Posts
|
Quote:
Steel wool is MUCH softer than barrel steel and WILL NOT harm your bore. You will clearly see the lead streaks that have been removed on the steel wool. |
|
The following member says Thank You to Doubs for your post: |
04-10-2020, 02:49 AM | #13 |
User
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Portland, Oregon
Posts: 3,903
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1,320 Times in 432 Posts
|
Davis's "Standard Catalog" is full of misinformation and errors, and cannot be trusted by someone without Luger knowledge.
The serial number range quoted is approximately correct, although there are other variations witnin that range. DWM's production archives are not to be found. Any estimate of commercial variation production is meaningless guesswork. The c/B, c/U, c/G proof information is in wrong. This proof suite was in use from the beginning of Parabellum production in 1900 to 1912, when it was replaced by the c/N nitro proof. c/B and c/U are always found stamped sideways on the left receiver. They are also found stamped on the breechblock. c/G without question indicates a rifled barrel, and is always found there with the other two marks. This protocol was established by the German proof law of 1891. My estimation of date of production--and it is assuredly only an estimate--is based on extensive serial number reporting of New Model variations correlated with the date of the German army's acceptance of the P08 and its subsequent commercial production. The comprehensive Luger library approaches 50 volumes. I recommend two books to you: "The Luger Book" by John Walter; and "Lugers At Random" by Charles Kenyon. Walters's book is fairly encyclopedic, and succeeds where Davis fails. Kenyon's book is over forty years old (and is therefore obsolete in some details), but it is still the only single-volume overview of Luger collector variations. The best, most up-to-date information on everything Luger is to be found in this forum and Jan Still's Luger Forum https://luger.gunboards.com/activity.php. --Dwight |
The following 2 members says Thank You to Dwight Gruber for your post: |
04-10-2020, 02:59 AM | #14 |
User
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Whidbey Island WA
Posts: 398
Thanks: 102
Thanked 125 Times in 74 Posts
|
What does coronavirus have to do with the price of Lugers?
If you want to know if you overpaid, tell us what you paid for it. What it's worth is going to vary a lot depending on if the barrel is really shot out or just clogged. - Geo
__________________
"Diplomacy is the art of saying nice doggie, until you can find a rock." - Will Rogers |
04-10-2020, 10:56 AM | #15 |
Moderator
2010 LugerForum Patron Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Santa Teresa New Mexico just outside of the West Texas town of El Paso
Posts: 7,022
Thanks: 1,090
Thanked 5,180 Times in 1,703 Posts
|
Walter wrote 2 books, "Luger" in 1977 and "The Luger Book" in 1986. Since the reference "The Luger book..." in post #5 just said the single word "Luger" I incorrectly assumed it was Walters first book. I am in total agreement that the Davis book is a minefield for individuals with limited Luger experience.
Ron
__________________
If it's made after 1918...it's a reproduction |
04-10-2020, 11:00 AM | #16 |
User
Join Date: Apr 2020
Posts: 58
Thanks: 80
Thanked 28 Times in 12 Posts
|
I've paid $700 for it and seems that barrel was shot out
|
04-10-2020, 11:03 AM | #17 |
User
Join Date: Apr 2020
Posts: 58
Thanks: 80
Thanked 28 Times in 12 Posts
|
Dwight and Ron, thank you for explanation! Will buy "The Luger Book" today and forget about Davis for now.
|
04-10-2020, 01:29 PM | #18 |
Patron
LugerForum Patron Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: POB 398 St.Charles,MO. 63302
Posts: 5,089
Thanks: 6
Thanked 736 Times in 483 Posts
|
Due to the heavy polishing and hot dip refinish, I feel that it is matching and early proofed is immaterial, so just a shot out 9mm shooter. If it functions reliably, $700 is a fair price in todays market. TH
|
The following 2 members says Thank You to Lugerdoc for your post: |
04-10-2020, 07:19 PM | #19 |
Lifer
Lifetime Forum Patron Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: Austin, Texas
Posts: 734
Thanks: 2,101
Thanked 613 Times in 330 Posts
|
I'd love to see the bore after you have cleaned it good !
Let us know how it shoots, too. |
The following member says Thank You to Mac Cat for your post: |
04-10-2020, 08:36 PM | #20 |
User
Join Date: Apr 2020
Posts: 58
Thanks: 80
Thanked 28 Times in 12 Posts
|
Here it is after cleaning. Wipe Out 12 hours - cleaned, 12 hours more - cleaned. A lot of blue colored goo(copper).
Last edited by briskspirit; 09-14-2020 at 09:59 AM. |
The following 2 members says Thank You to briskspirit for your post: |
Tags |
1906, 9mm, early lugers |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|