LugerForum Discussion Forums my profile | register | faq | search
upload photo | donate | calendar

Go Back   LugerForum Discussion Forums > Luger Discussion Forums > New Collectors Forum

Reply
Thread Tools Display Modes
Unread 01-26-2024, 11:30 AM   #1
Fred Patterson
User
 
Join Date: Sep 2023
Posts: 21
Thanks: 9
Thanked 34 Times in 8 Posts
Default Commercial Luger Date

I *think* this is a k date code. Would someone help me put a date to this navy Luger? Thanks!
Attached Thumbnails
Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_3057.jpg
Views:	26
Size:	82.0 KB
ID:	87978  

Fred Patterson is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 01-26-2024, 01:38 PM   #2
Edward Tinker
Super Moderator
Eternal Lifer
LugerForum
Patron
 
Edward Tinker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: North of Spokane, WA
Posts: 15,909
Thanks: 1,986
Thanked 4,500 Times in 2,076 Posts
Default

Need many pictures, since luger production started over every 10,000 guns.
Full top, full left, full right, full front.

Ed
__________________
Edward Tinker
************
Co-Author of Police Lugers - Co-Author of Simson Lugers
Author of Veteran Bring Backs Vol I, Vol II, Vol III and Vol IV

Edward Tinker is offline   Reply With Quote
The following 2 members says Thank You to Edward Tinker for your post:
Unread 01-26-2024, 02:34 PM   #3
Fred Patterson
User
 
Join Date: Sep 2023
Posts: 21
Thanks: 9
Thanked 34 Times in 8 Posts
Default Additional photos

Additional photos
Attached Thumbnails
Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_3069.jpg
Views:	34
Size:	142.9 KB
ID:	87979  

Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_3070.jpg
Views:	33
Size:	153.0 KB
ID:	87980  

Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_3071.jpg
Views:	37
Size:	62.3 KB
ID:	87981  

Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_3072.jpg
Views:	34
Size:	84.0 KB
ID:	87982  

Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_3075.jpg
Views:	26
Size:	185.0 KB
ID:	87983  

Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_3076.jpg
Views:	32
Size:	153.4 KB
ID:	87984  

Fred Patterson is offline   Reply With Quote
The following 6 members says Thank You to Fred Patterson for your post:
Unread 01-26-2024, 02:37 PM   #4
Fred Patterson
User
 
Join Date: Sep 2023
Posts: 21
Thanks: 9
Thanked 34 Times in 8 Posts
Default

Additional photo
Attached Thumbnails
Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_3074.jpg
Views:	30
Size:	54.1 KB
ID:	87985  

Fred Patterson is offline   Reply With Quote
The following 6 members says Thank You to Fred Patterson for your post:
Unread 01-26-2024, 02:50 PM   #5
Mac Cat
Lifer
Lifetime Forum
Patron
 
Mac Cat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: Austin, Texas
Posts: 670
Thanks: 2,009
Thanked 542 Times in 292 Posts
Default

Very nice Navy Luger.
I'd say 1921-22.
Mac Cat is offline   Reply With Quote
The following 3 members says Thank You to Mac Cat for your post:
Unread 01-26-2024, 04:03 PM   #6
Fred Patterson
User
 
Join Date: Sep 2023
Posts: 21
Thanks: 9
Thanked 34 Times in 8 Posts
Default

Can you help me learn why 1920-1921? Do you read the alpha- as a “k” also? Are we looking first at the s/n to get possibilities and then seeing which ones were made in the k-block?
Fred Patterson is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 01-26-2024, 04:45 PM   #7
Doubs
User
 
Doubs's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Byron, Georgia
Posts: 1,670
Thanks: 769
Thanked 1,611 Times in 525 Posts
Default

The change from 5 digit commercial serial numbers to the 4 digit with suffix letter - the "alphabet" commercial Lugers - began before mid-1921 according to Gortz & Sturgess. Commercial 5 digit production had reached 92000 which translated to the i letter suffix and that's the first letter used in 1921 when the switch was made. Once 10,000 i was reached, the next letter was k as they never used j because the i & j in written German was interchangeable.

If, as G&S suggest, production of the alphabet commercial Lugers began with 1 i or 2000 i as some think they did to match the 92,000 5 digit models produced, it's likely that your suffix k Luger was made in late 1921 or early 1922. Lacking specific production records, it's impossible to pin point the date more accurately.
Doubs is offline   Reply With Quote
The following 6 members says Thank You to Doubs for your post:
Unread 01-26-2024, 05:29 PM   #8
Fred Patterson
User
 
Join Date: Sep 2023
Posts: 21
Thanks: 9
Thanked 34 Times in 8 Posts
Default

FASCINATING!!

I’ve looked in both Catalog Of Lugers, Lugers at Random, and The Navy Luger and can’t find anything that looks like a fit. What am I missing?
Fred Patterson is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 01-26-2024, 07:58 PM   #9
Doubs
User
 
Doubs's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Byron, Georgia
Posts: 1,670
Thanks: 769
Thanked 1,611 Times in 525 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Fred Patterson View Post
FASCINATING!! I’ve looked in both Catalog Of Lugers, Lugers at Random, and The Navy Luger and can’t find anything that looks like a fit. What am I missing?
I'm not being flippant when I say that you're missing better reference material. There has been lots of research and new found information released since those books were authored. Not that they are bad; just that new data has been discovered. Also, in the 1920's there were many odd variations of the Luger produced. It's an interesting period in the history of the Luger and comprehensive information just isn't always available.
Doubs is offline   Reply With Quote
The following 7 members says Thank You to Doubs for your post:
Unread 01-26-2024, 08:38 PM   #10
Fred Patterson
User
 
Join Date: Sep 2023
Posts: 21
Thanks: 9
Thanked 34 Times in 8 Posts
Default

No problem here - I’m extremely difficult to offend. And the truth is the truth.

I am familiar with the Gortz & Sturgess volumes, but unless I can get them through interlibrary loan they are beyond my book budget.
Fred Patterson is offline   Reply With Quote
The following 2 members says Thank You to Fred Patterson for your post:
Unread 01-27-2024, 11:57 AM   #11
Dwight Gruber
User
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Portland, Oregon
Posts: 3,889
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1,281 Times in 423 Posts
Default

What caliber is this Luger pleas?


--Dwight
Dwight Gruber is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 01-27-2024, 07:50 PM   #12
Fred Patterson
User
 
Join Date: Sep 2023
Posts: 21
Thanks: 9
Thanked 34 Times in 8 Posts
Default

Really good question. It’s not marked, and I don’t know how to tell. Do you know?
Fred Patterson is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 01-27-2024, 09:44 PM   #13
Fred Patterson
User
 
Join Date: Sep 2023
Posts: 21
Thanks: 9
Thanked 34 Times in 8 Posts
Default

Oops … I didn’t take note of who had asked the question. I ‘spect you do know. (grin)
Fred Patterson is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 01-28-2024, 09:34 AM   #14
Kiwi
User
 
Kiwi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2019
Location: Wrong side of the Delaware river
Posts: 291
Thanks: 198
Thanked 413 Times in 162 Posts
Default

Check FAQ's on this forum or search "pencil test" for caliber
Kiwi is offline   Reply With Quote
The following member says Thank You to Kiwi for your post:
Unread 01-28-2024, 11:30 AM   #15
Fred Patterson
User
 
Join Date: Sep 2023
Posts: 21
Thanks: 9
Thanked 34 Times in 8 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dwight Gruber View Post
What caliber is this Luger pleas?


--Dwight
Hmmm … Pencil Test says 9mm. I’ll find my caliper and report back with a measurement.
Fred Patterson is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 01-28-2024, 03:34 PM   #16
Mac Cat
Lifer
Lifetime Forum
Patron
 
Mac Cat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: Austin, Texas
Posts: 670
Thanks: 2,009
Thanked 542 Times in 292 Posts
Default

You might want to buy a package of Snapcaps in 9mm (I don't think I have ever seen any in 7.65x21). It's a safe way to check the function.
Mac Cat is offline   Reply With Quote
The following 2 members says Thank You to Mac Cat for your post:
Unread 01-28-2024, 03:51 PM   #17
Fred Patterson
User
 
Join Date: Sep 2023
Posts: 21
Thanks: 9
Thanked 34 Times in 8 Posts
Default

My inside micrometer isn’t ideal for this, but the closest measurement I could get at the exit of the barrel was 8.865mm. Any error would have put me reading a bit low, so I’m comfortable saying it’s a 9mm.
Fred Patterson is offline   Reply With Quote
The following 4 members says Thank You to Fred Patterson for your post:
Unread 01-29-2024, 07:53 PM   #18
Yakman
User
 
Yakman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: Indiana
Posts: 119
Thanks: 878
Thanked 81 Times in 40 Posts
Default

Fred,

Your only question is about the year of manufacture. From this can I assume you do not question its authenticity as a factory original configuration?

Jack
Yakman is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 01-30-2024, 06:27 AM   #19
Fred Patterson
User
 
Join Date: Sep 2023
Posts: 21
Thanks: 9
Thanked 34 Times in 8 Posts
Default

Jack, I don’t know enough to question it. Give me your thoughts.
Fred Patterson is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 01-30-2024, 12:22 PM   #20
Yakman
User
 
Yakman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: Indiana
Posts: 119
Thanks: 878
Thanked 81 Times in 40 Posts
Default

Fred,

Almost anything is possible with commercials made in the 1920s. My first question is why a 9m/m at a time when all new Lugers (DWM) were supposed to be 7.65? Although many Lugers were exported without barrels to have them installed (9m/m) in their destination countries, this gun, if original, and for this writing let's assume it is, has a barrel which is Berlin proofed, evidence it is original to the gun. According to the German proof law, to proof a pistol it has to be complete, assembled, and serial numbered. This Luger seems to meet that requirement. Although it being 9m/m as an alphabet Luger is unusual, it is not unique.

The next thing I'd look at is the Navy rear sight for originality. A few years ago, some aftermarket replicas were produced, and I believe sold by SARCO. Maybe they are still available, I don't know. Some where I've seen written how to tell them from originals, I don't remember where, maybe G&S. I would be surprised if you found the sight not to be original.

I had an alphabet Navy style commercial up until 3 or 4 years ago, "o" suffix range. Mine had an unnumbered Navy marked barrel and what I finally determined to be a repro rear sight. I sold it as a shooter. If I had the one you show I'd still own it.

Does the Luger you show belong to you? If it does, I'd suggest you keep it as the alphabet Navy style commercial it purports to be until someone convinces you otherwise. I don't see that its GERMANY import marked, so maybe it was produced for some domestic purpose.

Simpson Ltd has one similar for sale, also a "k" suffix, you might want to check it out. DWM 1920 NAVY COMMERCIAL - C26327
Yakman is offline   Reply With Quote
The following member says Thank You to Yakman for your post:
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:56 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 1998 - 2024, Lugerforum.com