LugerForum Discussion Forums my profile | register | faq | search
upload photo | donate | calendar

Go Back   LugerForum Discussion Forums > Luger Discussion Forums > Early Lugers (1900-1906)

Reply
Thread Tools Display Modes
Unread 03-06-2022, 12:04 AM   #1
spripple33
User
 
spripple33's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2020
Location: Gettysburg, PA
Posts: 85
Thanks: 137
Thanked 167 Times in 54 Posts
Default a well-used 1900 Test Eagle

Meet the newest (unplanned ) member of my Luger family: Test Eagle s.n. 7006. This serial number is on the Bannerman list and is also noted by Michael Reese in his book, 1900 Luger U.S. Test Trials (my thanks to Spangy for noticing this).

It has led a hard life, having been re-finished long ago and apparently used quite a bit since. The barrel, toggle-train and side-plate are mismatched to the frame and to each other but are numbered in the same font, leading me to believe this may have been one of the trials guns used in the interchangeability test. The barrel s.n. is 6247, which is not on the Bannerman list, but is in the generally accepted range. This would seem to confirm this s.n. as also part of the original 1000 gun delivery?

Any and all thoughts and comments are welcome. Thanks!

-Jason
Attached Thumbnails
Click image for larger version

Name:	1900TE 001.jpg
Views:	95
Size:	85.7 KB
ID:	84887  

Click image for larger version

Name:	1900TE 002.jpg
Views:	87
Size:	80.5 KB
ID:	84888  

Click image for larger version

Name:	1900TE 003.jpg
Views:	80
Size:	56.2 KB
ID:	84889  

Click image for larger version

Name:	1900TE 008.jpg
Views:	81
Size:	81.1 KB
ID:	84890  

Click image for larger version

Name:	1900TE 005.jpg
Views:	81
Size:	80.8 KB
ID:	84891  

Click image for larger version

Name:	1900TE 006.jpg
Views:	84
Size:	91.2 KB
ID:	84892  

Click image for larger version

Name:	1900TE 009.jpg
Views:	85
Size:	57.9 KB
ID:	84893  

Click image for larger version

Name:	1900TE 016.jpg
Views:	73
Size:	78.8 KB
ID:	84894  

Click image for larger version

Name:	1900TE 017.jpg
Views:	82
Size:	66.8 KB
ID:	84895  

Click image for larger version

Name:	1900TE 024.jpg
Views:	77
Size:	81.7 KB
ID:	84896  

spripple33 is offline   Reply With Quote
The following 4 members says Thank You to spripple33 for your post:
Unread 03-06-2022, 10:14 AM   #2
Mac Cat
Lifer
Lifetime Forum
Patron
 
Mac Cat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: Austin, Texas
Posts: 665
Thanks: 1,994
Thanked 538 Times in 291 Posts
Default

Looks well cared for and your photos are very good, too !
Mac Cat is offline   Reply With Quote
The following 3 members says Thank You to Mac Cat for your post:
Unread 03-06-2022, 10:29 AM   #3
jeb111
Patron
LugerForum
Patron
 
Join Date: May 2018
Location: wyoming
Posts: 275
Thanks: 676
Thanked 321 Times in 131 Posts
Default

I like it! . Shouldn’t we see more Test Lugers like this? Mismatched and used looking. After all when the testing was finished and all the pistols recalled they were gone through and worn parts swapped out with good ones from other worn pistols. I am no expert on Test AE’s but to me there is no doubt about this pistol being one and so desirable by collectors even it being refinished! Congrats, I am envious!
Jim

Last edited by jeb111; 03-06-2022 at 04:56 PM.
jeb111 is offline   Reply With Quote
The following member says Thank You to jeb111 for your post:
Unread 03-06-2022, 10:35 AM   #4
Ron Wood
Moderator
2010 LugerForum
Patron
 
Ron Wood's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Santa Teresa New Mexico just outside of the West Texas town of El Paso
Posts: 6,985
Thanks: 1,059
Thanked 5,082 Times in 1,673 Posts
Default

Thanks for the update on #7006, I've added the info to my records. Not a bad looking example even considering the refurbishment. A nice addition to any collection. Well done.
Ron
__________________
If it's made after 1918...it's a reproduction
Ron Wood is offline   Reply With Quote
The following 3 members says Thank You to Ron Wood for your post:
Unread 03-06-2022, 12:28 PM   #5
cirelaw
Lifer
Lifetime Forum
Patron
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: PORT ST LUCIE, FLORIDA
Posts: 12,216
Thanks: 6,209
Thanked 4,133 Times in 2,173 Posts
Default

Sweet~~~
cirelaw is offline   Reply With Quote
The following member says Thank You to cirelaw for your post:
Unread 03-06-2022, 04:16 PM   #6
spangy
Lifer
Lifetime Forum
Patron
 
spangy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2020
Location: Winnipeg, Canada
Posts: 606
Thanks: 2,964
Thanked 1,047 Times in 422 Posts
Default

Nice one Jason

Finally in your hands and what a beauty.
__________________
Whoever said that "money can't buy you happiness" never bought a Luger.
WTB - Take Down Lever & Trigger Plate (#90) for an Imperial Artillery.
spangy is offline   Reply With Quote
The following 2 members says Thank You to spangy for your post:
Unread 03-06-2022, 09:31 PM   #7
Norme
Always A
Lifetime Forum
Patron
 
Norme's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Colorado
Posts: 2,414
Thanks: 223
Thanked 2,590 Times in 930 Posts
Default

Nice one Jason. I don't know much about Test Lugers, they're not my field, but your photos are excellent!
Regards, Norm
Norme is offline   Reply With Quote
The following member says Thank You to Norme for your post:
Unread 03-06-2022, 11:13 PM   #8
spripple33
User
 
spripple33's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2020
Location: Gettysburg, PA
Posts: 85
Thanks: 137
Thanked 167 Times in 54 Posts
Default

Thank you everyone for the kind words! Ron, if you need/want any further details or pictures, I'm more than happy to oblige.
-Jason
spripple33 is offline   Reply With Quote
The following member says Thank You to spripple33 for your post:
Unread 03-07-2022, 01:28 AM   #9
MFC
User
 
MFC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Louisiana
Posts: 1,237
Thanks: 183
Thanked 281 Times in 162 Posts
Default

Hi Jason,
Congratulations. Welcome to the Test Eagle Club.
I own #7008... soooo close!
Mine is also on the Bannerman list.

PS. Does anybody know where 7007 is?
__________________
Mike C.
MFC is offline   Reply With Quote
The following member says Thank You to MFC for your post:
Unread 03-07-2022, 10:18 AM   #10
DonVoigt
User
 
DonVoigt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: near Charlotte NC
Posts: 4,674
Thanks: 1,435
Thanked 4,341 Times in 2,036 Posts
Default

Nice find, and great picts as others have said !

To the point:
This would seem to confirm this s.n. as also part of the original 1000 gun delivery?


I don't think so, at least not definitively; the upper could have been changed at any time and by anyone prior to the refinish. That the font is the same would be expected within that serial range.
JMHO.

However, the mismatch does not detract at all from the fact you have a test luger lower.
__________________
03man(Don Voigt); Luger student and collector.
Looking for DWM side plate: 69 ; Dreyse 1907 pistol K.S. Gendarmerie
DonVoigt is offline   Reply With Quote
The following 3 members says Thank You to DonVoigt for your post:
Unread 03-08-2022, 10:17 PM   #11
spripple33
User
 
spripple33's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2020
Location: Gettysburg, PA
Posts: 85
Thanks: 137
Thanked 167 Times in 54 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by DonVoigt View Post
To the point:
This would seem to confirm this s.n. as also part of the original 1000 gun delivery?


I don't think so, at least not definitively; the upper could have been changed at any time and by anyone prior to the refinish. That the font is the same would be expected within that serial range. JMHO
Don,

I agree with you and that's why I said "would seem" and phrased it as a question. I am very interested in ALL opinions on this specific aspect of this Luger- good, bad or indifferent.

I am not nearly as knowledgeable as you or many others here about such things so I am hoping this post will help me and other "newbies" learn about this Luger specifically and test eagles in general... I will just give my reasoning on why I think this is the most likely explanation.

I find the axiom that the simplest explanation is the most likely one to be true. This Luger possibly being one used in the interchangeability test IS the simplest explanation. It being assembled by Bannerman out of test eagles too rough to sell as complete guns is the second simplest.

I think it would be an AMAZING coincidence if, sometime after it was sold by Bannerman, the frame just happened to get matched up with an American Eagle barrel/receiver that has no commercial proofmarks and is also in the generally accepted test eagle s.n. range AND with a toggle assembly that also has no commercial proofmarks. It would almost have to be done with knowledge and intent.

If the person who matched them up then restored it, why would they then actively use it, knowing it's desirability? Quite a bit, judging by the almost complete lack of bluing on the grip straps and frame rails. The refinish looks very old and the mismatched parts look like they have all been together for a long time.

Respectfully,
-Jason
spripple33 is offline   Reply With Quote
The following 2 members says Thank You to spripple33 for your post:
Unread 03-11-2022, 01:17 PM   #12
DonVoigt
User
 
DonVoigt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: near Charlotte NC
Posts: 4,674
Thanks: 1,435
Thanked 4,341 Times in 2,036 Posts
Default

Jason,
all that is true; but given the number of "boosted or improved or outright fake" lugers and the $$ value of certain varieties- logic does not always apply.

I said "at least not definitively", so until that serial number shows up in period documentation it is suspect to me, and its provenance is unknown. The fact that the upper is over 100 numbers before the first documented Test Eagle does not help.

I agree it could have been done with knowledge and intent; but intent to what ?
Perhaps as you speculate: repaired in service; or maybe just a luger lower restored for shooting, at some time in the past with a close numbered upper?

The person who "repaired or restored" that lower - may or may not have known it had any desirability other than being a "luger". JMHO

All that said, even a well worn old model with a TE lower is very nice to have !
__________________
03man(Don Voigt); Luger student and collector.
Looking for DWM side plate: 69 ; Dreyse 1907 pistol K.S. Gendarmerie
DonVoigt is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 03-11-2022, 09:56 PM   #13
spripple33
User
 
spripple33's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2020
Location: Gettysburg, PA
Posts: 85
Thanks: 137
Thanked 167 Times in 54 Posts
Default

I am very curious as to what condition it was in when it was "authenticated" and included in Mr. Reese's book, since he only recorded the serial number.
-Jason
spripple33 is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 03-11-2022, 11:00 PM   #14
Edward Tinker
Super Moderator
Eternal Lifer
LugerForum
Patron
 
Edward Tinker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: North of Spokane, WA
Posts: 15,902
Thanks: 1,981
Thanked 4,487 Times in 2,071 Posts
Default

Interesting - the mismatched barrel leads me to thinking it is more likely to be a test than not.
When you read the original documents, it states a couple of times of guns being gathered, and parts scavenged from other guns from the ones purchased.
Clark and Dwight have been looking into this for a number of years, I am hoping they get further information - although Dwight posted a comment recently on the test lugers.
Edward Tinker is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 03-12-2022, 10:06 AM   #15
DonVoigt
User
 
DonVoigt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: near Charlotte NC
Posts: 4,674
Thanks: 1,435
Thanked 4,341 Times in 2,036 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Edward Tinker View Post
Interesting - the mismatched barrel leads me to thinking it is more likely to be a test than not.
When you read the original documents, it states a couple of times of guns being gathered, and parts scavenged from other guns from the ones purchased.

Clark and Dwight have been looking into this for a number of years, I am hoping they get further information - although Dwight posted a comment recently on the test lugers.
It would me too, IF the upper number were in the recognized/reported range and not over 100#'s before.
__________________
03man(Don Voigt); Luger student and collector.
Looking for DWM side plate: 69 ; Dreyse 1907 pistol K.S. Gendarmerie
DonVoigt is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 03-12-2022, 06:06 PM   #16
jeb111
Patron
LugerForum
Patron
 
Join Date: May 2018
Location: wyoming
Posts: 275
Thanks: 676
Thanked 321 Times in 131 Posts
Default

Don I am confused, the barrel #6247 falls within the Bannerman range doesn't it? i also see that in Scott Meadows book U.S. Military Automatic Pistols that the range is listed at approximately 6000-7500. I know these #'s can be construed as conflicting. but couldn't the barrel and upper come from a cannibalized Test Luger? Am I missing something?
Jim
jeb111 is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 03-13-2022, 03:57 PM   #17
Dwight Gruber
User
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Portland, Oregon
Posts: 3,889
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1,280 Times in 423 Posts
Default

Please re-read this and adjust your expectations accordingly https://forum.lugerforum.com/showthr...st+eagle+chaos


--Dwight
Dwight Gruber is offline   Reply With Quote
The following 2 members says Thank You to Dwight Gruber for your post:
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:42 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 1998 - 2023, Lugerforum.com