K Date Lugers, Faked and Restored - Page 2

Motown · 04-06-2013, 10:57 PM

Scriptic S vs straight S...when did they use they use the scriptic vs straight s?

Lugerdoc · 04-07-2013, 08:50 AM

Leon, Sorry but the cleaning rod is currently on hold for Mike D, another Forum member. TH

Edward Tinker · 04-07-2013, 09:52 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by glock30

THis is a REAL one....

very nice. Did you realize your caps lock was stuck on for the word "real"...

abzug · 05-07-2013, 05:57 PM

Frank, many years ago I owned K Date 734 with two matching mags. It had been carefully rerust blued/ restored.

Frank · 05-07-2013, 07:24 PM

abzug, do you have photos? Do you remember details? Mauser Hump? Set back front sight?

abzug · 05-07-2013, 10:06 PM

Frank, no photos, it was over 40 years ago, I believe (as far as my memory can be relied upon) it had ö37 inspection stamps, Fraktur S toggle and parts marks, frame humps and standard barrel band. I don't remember whether it had the receiver indent. Perhaps the current owner can provide more details if he should happen read this.

Frank · 05-08-2013, 08:30 AM

abzug, thanks!! That's a while ago!!

Sergio Natali · 08-14-2013, 02:43 PM

Next week I'm going to buy a "K" Luger from a reputable gunshop where I've already purchased several good guns. In my gallery there is already a photo of it but next week I'll try to send more photos.

Sergio Natali · 09-28-2013, 08:01 AM

Frank
I assume you are still interested in collecting data, I'm sending three photos of my "K" model s/n 9114, but it's not as nice as the one above, mine looks a bit more used and abused.

Frank · 09-28-2013, 08:21 AM

luger.para, thanks for the K Date data. Your pistol doesn't seem to have the "Mauser Hump", is that true? Could you please send us a picture of the inspection marks on the right side of the receiver? Frank

Sergio Natali · 09-28-2013, 11:39 AM

No Mauser hump-
Ok one of these days I'll take a snap to that girl and I'll post it!

04-06-2013, 10:57 PM	#21
Motown User Join Date: Sep 2004 Location: Double Oak, TX Posts: 47 Thanks: 0 Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts	Scriptic S vs straight S...when did they use they use the scriptic vs straight s? __________________ "Avoid excessive sharpness or harshness of voice, which usually indicates the man who has shortcomings of his own to hide." --Field Marshall Erwin Rommel

04-07-2013, 08:50 AM	#22
Lugerdoc Patron LugerForum Patron Join Date: Jun 2002 Location: POB 398 St.Charles,MO. 63302 Posts: 5,089 Thanks: 6 Thanked 737 Times in 484 Posts	Leon, Sorry but the cleaning rod is currently on hold for Mike D, another Forum member. TH __________________ Tom Heller POB 398 ST.Charles, MO. 63302 Tel 636-447-3006 lugerdoc@charter.net

05-07-2013, 10:06 PM	#26
abzug User Join Date: Sep 2009 Location: Texas, USA Posts: 13 Thanks: 25 Thanked 7 Times in 4 Posts	Frank, no photos, it was over 40 years ago, I believe (as far as my memory can be relied upon) it had ö37 inspection stamps, Fraktur S toggle and parts marks, frame humps and standard barrel band. I don't remember whether it had the receiver indent. Perhaps the current owner can provide more details if he should happen read this. Last edited by abzug; 05-07-2013 at 11:29 PM.

08-14-2013, 02:43 PM	#28
Sergio Natali User Join Date: Feb 2013 Location: Somewhere in Northern Italy Posts: 2,646 Thanks: 1,087 Thanked 1,783 Times in 1,007 Posts	K date Luger Next week I'm going to buy a "K" Luger from a reputable gunshop where I've already purchased several good guns. In my gallery there is already a photo of it but next week I'll try to send more photos.

09-28-2013, 08:01 AM	#29
Sergio Natali User Join Date: Feb 2013 Location: Somewhere in Northern Italy Posts: 2,646 Thanks: 1,087 Thanked 1,783 Times in 1,007 Posts	Frank I assume you are still interested in collecting data, I'm sending three photos of my "K" model s/n 9114, but it's not as nice as the one above, mine looks a bit more used and abused. Attached Thumbnails __________________ "Originality can't be restored and should be at the top of any collector's priority list.

05-07-2013, 05:57 PM	#24
abzug User Join Date: Sep 2009 Location: Texas, USA Posts: 13 Thanks: 25 Thanked 7 Times in 4 Posts	Frank, many years ago I owned K Date 734 with two matching mags. It had been carefully rerust blued/ restored.

05-07-2013, 07:24 PM	#25
Frank RIP Patron LugerForum Patron Join Date: Jun 2002 Location: Hot & Dry PHX, AZ Posts: 2,078 Thanks: 24 Thanked 164 Times in 87 Posts	abzug, do you have photos? Do you remember details? Mauser Hump? Set back front sight?

05-08-2013, 08:30 AM	#27
Frank RIP Patron LugerForum Patron Join Date: Jun 2002 Location: Hot & Dry PHX, AZ Posts: 2,078 Thanks: 24 Thanked 164 Times in 87 Posts	abzug, thanks!! That's a while ago!!

09-28-2013, 08:21 AM	#30
Frank RIP Patron LugerForum Patron Join Date: Jun 2002 Location: Hot & Dry PHX, AZ Posts: 2,078 Thanks: 24 Thanked 164 Times in 87 Posts	luger.para, thanks for the K Date data. Your pistol doesn't seem to have the "Mauser Hump", is that true? Could you please send us a picture of the inspection marks on the right side of the receiver? Frank

09-28-2013, 11:39 AM	#31
Sergio Natali User Join Date: Feb 2013 Location: Somewhere in Northern Italy Posts: 2,646 Thanks: 1,087 Thanked 1,783 Times in 1,007 Posts	No Mauser hump- Ok one of these days I'll take a snap to that girl and I'll post it! __________________ "Originality can't be restored and should be at the top of any collector's priority list.