my profile |
register |
faq |
search upload photo | donate | calendar |
08-25-2002, 07:42 PM | #21 |
Super Moderator
Eternal Lifer LugerForum Patron Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: North of Spokane, WA
Posts: 15,927
Thanks: 2,026
Thanked 4,525 Times in 2,090 Posts
|
A quick look through the Dutch Luger book shows an artillery that has a resemblance to the holster, but not the same one. I didn't spot any others from a quick look tho.
__________________
Edward Tinker ************ Co-Author of Police Lugers - Co-Author of Simson Lugers Author of Veteran Bring Backs Vol I, Vol II, Vol III and Vol IV |
08-25-2002, 08:07 PM | #22 |
User
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Colorado
Posts: 1,096
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
|
Garfield,
That is what he said. I asked him again to make sure there was no mistake. I am pretty sure I have rode this horse into the ground. Think that I'll kick it a couple of times and head on down the trail. Gentlemen, thank you all for your information.
__________________
Noli me vocare, ego te vocabo, wes -------------------- |
08-25-2002, 10:06 PM | #23 |
User
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: A little SE of Nome
Posts: 239
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Must of been a holster book written by some other "Bender".
|
08-25-2002, 10:30 PM | #24 |
User
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Colorado
Posts: 1,096
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
|
The seller of this holster has informed me that a buyer has stepped up and purchased this holster. I guess someone on the forum had no qualms about the holster.
Seller says that 'snaps' were in production by 1911 at the latest. Well within the timeframe for production of the 1900. Were the long frame variations still in production after the introduction of the short frame pistols? My understanding is that whenever a change in design was implemented, the former design was ceased in production. Surely, a 1906 commercial is not a 1900.
__________________
Noli me vocare, ego te vocabo, wes -------------------- |
|
|