LugerForum Discussion Forums my profile | register | faq | search
upload photo | donate | calendar

Go Back   LugerForum Discussion Forums > General Discussion Forums > Shooting and Reloading

Reply
Thread Tools Display Modes
Unread 09-07-2005, 04:42 PM   #1
zeke1312
User
 
zeke1312's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 167
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Default I should of asked

before I purchased 9mm Winchester 147 GR TCMC @ Wal*Mart. I've noticed from other posts this load is too hot? If, so, I assume I should not use at all?
zeke1312 is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 09-07-2005, 04:47 PM   #2
Hugh
RIP
 
Hugh's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Southeast Texas Swamp
Posts: 2,460
Thanks: 2
Thanked 165 Times in 64 Posts
Default

Not too hot for a Luger! But the bullet is too heavy to reliably work some Lugers actions. The Win 115 gr works much better. Actually, I like the load and it works fine in a few of my "tuned" Lugers.
__________________
TRUMP FOR PREZ IN '20!
Hugh is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 09-07-2005, 05:04 PM   #3
unspellable
User
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Iowa
Posts: 768
Thanks: 0
Thanked 19 Times in 11 Posts
Default 147 grains?

How would a 147 grain bullet detract from reliability? Are they pushing it out the barrel all that slow?
unspellable is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 09-07-2005, 05:09 PM   #4
Hugh
RIP
 
Hugh's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Southeast Texas Swamp
Posts: 2,460
Thanks: 2
Thanked 165 Times in 64 Posts
Default

I dunno, has sumthin to do with the "impulse" on the toggle train, I think the burning rate of the powder is slower than that used with the lighter bullets.
__________________
TRUMP FOR PREZ IN '20!
Hugh is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 09-07-2005, 06:03 PM   #5
Dwight Gruber
User
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Portland, Oregon
Posts: 3,897
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1,294 Times in 427 Posts
Default

Zeke,

Shoot it all up and let us know how it works out.

--Dwight
Dwight Gruber is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 09-07-2005, 06:14 PM   #6
unspellable
User
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Iowa
Posts: 768
Thanks: 0
Thanked 19 Times in 11 Posts
Default 147 grainers

While you do have to have an impulse within the correct range, the powder burning rate doesn't have much to do with that. Could it be that the 147 grainer being more "nose heavy" aggravates the modern 9 mm cartridge's propensity for being too short? Both factors would tend to tilt the nose downward.
unspellable is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 09-08-2005, 02:51 PM   #7
Sieger
User
 
Sieger's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: New York, NY
Posts: 1,575
Thanks: 2,124
Thanked 400 Times in 249 Posts
Default Re: 147 grainers

Quote:
Originally posted by unspellable
While you do have to have an impulse within the correct range, the powder burning rate doesn't have much to do with that. Could it be that the 147 grainer being more "nose heavy" aggravates the modern 9 mm cartridge's propensity for being too short? Both factors would tend to tilt the nose downward.
The infamous OAL problem again.

We had a shooter, a few weeks ago, claim that the 147 stuff wouldn't even eject.

Just how slow is this stuff anyway?

Sieger
Sieger is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 09-09-2005, 09:29 PM   #8
Dwight Gruber
User
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Portland, Oregon
Posts: 3,897
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1,294 Times in 427 Posts
Default

As a test, I shot a boxful (50 rounds) of Federal American Eagle FMJ 147-gr out of my 1936 S/42 this afternoon. Mec-Gar magazines. 100% functional reilability.

--Dwight
Dwight Gruber is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:27 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 1998 - 2024, Lugerforum.com