LugerForum Discussion Forums my profile | register | faq | search
upload photo | donate | calendar

Go Back   LugerForum Discussion Forums > Luger Discussion Forums > Commercial Lugers

Reply
Thread Tools Display Modes
Unread 08-22-2005, 08:39 PM   #21
Hoyt Weathers
User
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Trinity, Alabama
Posts: 61
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

Thanks Ron,

You are correct I think. It was an uphill slog, but I made it.

I have a couple of nits to pick with a couple of guys above in this thread. They seem to have seen something in the pictures of my pistol which I do not see - and are not there, and drew some astounding conclusions therefrom. I have the pistol, they do not. I am not a seasoned collector, but I see what I see. I took pictures of all of the marks I saw at that time. Since taking those pics, I have found other marks which may or may not be of any significance. It may or may not be worth the effort, but I wish to add to the physical knowledge of this pistol and its history.

I will address those two issues, stated above, later with a msg on this Forum to those two named individuals. They may be correct. I do not know. I am willing to be convinced if they pony up their rationale and logical reasons, and statements of what they saw in the pictures that I do not see.

I am NOT trying to pick a fight here with them. I am too old to be dishonest.

Regards,
Hoyt
__________________
"When I die, if there are no dogs in Heaven then I want to go where they are." (Will Rogers)
Hoyt Weathers is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:41 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 1998 - 2024, Lugerforum.com