my profile |
register |
faq |
search upload photo | donate | calendar |
01-17-2003, 03:03 PM | #1 |
User
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: CA
Posts: 30
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Info on my 1916 DWM luger
Ok I am still deciding on the 41 ByF so I thought I would have all of you tell me about my 1916.All part numbers match on pistol except grips and mag.
1916 DWM Serial 4312 Under barrel: 4312 then a fancy looking "X" then 882 under that. Right frame: Proof marks #15 from the tech page Right barrel: Proof mark #17 Breech block: Proof mark # 14 Front of frame: 4312 with an fancy looking "a" prefix. There is a lug on the bottom of the barrel that is stamped "VF" Extractor "Geladen" Front strap marked: 127.R.12.23 Bore is pitted, Lands/grooves not very sharp at all, it's seen many rounds!! All internal parts are numbered #12 Grips and Mag do not match. Finish, 80% strawing on the correct parts is there. What do you think? Value, Shooter? I will post some pics. I am going to buy a Digital camera today. Thanks...Bryon |
01-17-2003, 04:34 PM | #2 |
Super Moderator
Eternal Lifer LugerForum Patron Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: North of Spokane, WA
Posts: 15,933
Thanks: 2,032
Thanked 4,530 Times in 2,092 Posts
|
The pitting is a shame, but gives it character, also being unit marked is great.
I would, unless I missed something, a low to mid grade collector?
__________________
Edward Tinker ************ Co-Author of Police Lugers - Co-Author of Simson Lugers Author of Veteran Bring Backs Vol I, Vol II, Vol III and Vol IV |
01-18-2003, 08:16 PM | #3 |
User
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: D/FW, Tx
Posts: 279
Thanks: 109
Thanked 31 Times in 16 Posts
|
Bryon,
* Hi again !! How's that "widow" treating ya?? Still a slice of history. Glad you can enjoy. Sounds like it was a good deal!! * Jan Still's Vol. IV, Imperial Lugers, Pg.24 states 140,000 of this 1916 DWM were made. DWM's most prolific WWI production year. All data you reported fits a WWI Army save for the "fancy x". * Serial range of known examples is 80_ to 7060q. * The test proof #17 is an Erfurt Arsenal mark & is known to rightfully exist on some examples. Guess that was how DWM made so many...used barrels from the Army Arsenal to overcome their own part's shortages. * Jan states only 1% of the 1916 DWM's were Unit marked. As Ed notes, this is a plus for this piece. * As you can see by the S/N range, an "x" by the barrel S/N is out-of-range. Neither DWM nor Erfurt are known to have made it to the "x" block in any WWI year of production based on current reported examples. Mystery mark... possibly interpreted a number of ways (Post War, barrel condemnation, etc.). The digitals may help clear this up. Anyway, the S/N of this piece is the frame S/N of 4312a. * Agree with Ed on "a collectible" w/ the "x" Caveat pending. WR |
01-19-2003, 04:39 AM | #4 |
User
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: CA
Posts: 30
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
I can't pick up the 41 ByF for 10 days since I live the Peoples Republic of Kalifornia.
With regard to the DWM, I guess I will have two shooters. I have not taken this pistol apart since my father gave it to me, haven't fired it either. So I was wondering about the grips today, I took the entire pistol apart, and the inside of the grip panels are stamped #12. Very nice, I starting to feel really good, Now the bad news, I did not see a #12 on the firing pin or the rear axis pin Oh well. I have two nice pieces of history that I can shoot. I guess this means I need a true collector piece!! My wife is going to kill me!! Thanks for all of your help, I will be much better informed on the Luger #3!! |
01-19-2003, 09:06 AM | #5 |
Patron
LugerForum Patron Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: POB 398 St.Charles,MO. 63302
Posts: 5,089
Thanks: 6
Thanked 736 Times in 483 Posts
|
Byron, The main axels of WW1 PO8s were unnumbered, unless reworked after orig production. Your unrelieved firing pin should have the last 2 digits of the serial.
|
01-19-2003, 12:36 PM | #6 |
User
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: The USA
Posts: 5,919
Thanks: 0
Thanked 6 Times in 4 Posts
|
Byron,
Since you mentioned you need to wait 10-days for your next luger in CA-State, I will assume you do not have a C&R licence. You might find out that you also will run into the "not more than 1 gun per month" limitation in CA-State as well. Both of these pieces of nonsense and the $75-$100 transfer fees my local gun shops were charging me, lead me to see the wisdom of a C&R license... Here is the breakdown on the licenses and fees in CA-State : 1. Federal BATF C&R license, $ 30.00 (may have gone up recently...), good for 3 years. 2. CA-State COE (certificate of elgibility), $ 18.00, good for 1 year. 3. CA-State BFSC (basic firearms safety certificate), $ 12.00, good for life. 4. CA-State, $ 14.00 registration fee to the DOJ for each C&R gun I bring into the State. You have 5-days from time of possession to file this fee/form with each gun. It goes down to $ 10.00 per gun if you register more than one gun at the same time. Great place for gun ownership... <img border="0" title="" alt="[Wink]" src="wink.gif" /> Regards, Pete... <img border="0" alt="[typing]" title="" src="graemlins/yltype.gif" /> |
|
|