my profile |
register |
faq |
search upload photo | donate | calendar |
02-28-2017, 09:54 AM | #1 |
User
Join Date: Apr 2016
Location: Newburgh,IN
Posts: 790
Thanks: 393
Thanked 631 Times in 334 Posts
|
Military vs Police design
Why the distinct difference in design? Why did the military want a holster strap that has a buckle and is designed with a strap that is attached to the lid and reaches south? Conversely, why did the police want a strap that is attached to the front of the holster that reaches north and attaches to a stud?
Essentially the same pistol; different holster designs. There must be a functional reason. Inquiring newbies want to know.
__________________
“God created war so that Americans would learn geography.” ― Mark Twain |
The following member says Thank You to Eugen for your post: |
02-28-2017, 10:05 AM | #2 |
Always A
Lifetime Forum Patron Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Colorado
Posts: 2,417
Thanks: 226
Thanked 2,603 Times in 933 Posts
|
Hi Eugene,
The police were not armed with Lugers until WW1 ended when surplus arms became available. They were supplied with shortened Artillery holsters which, as you know, have closure straps that go North, rather than P08 holsters which have straps that head South West. I guess they liked the arrangement and decided to stick with it with new production. Regards, Norm |
The following 7 members says Thank You to Norme for your post: |
02-28-2017, 10:07 AM | #3 |
User
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Kennett Square Pennsylvania
Posts: 591
Thanks: 15
Thanked 334 Times in 104 Posts
|
Ill take a stab at this. And I may be wrong. In the event an officer needed to quickly draw the weapon a button tab would be alot quicker to undo than fumbling around with a buckle.Also the vertical alignment would allow the flap to open in a smoother fashion with the liftstrap being used.
Just a guess W |
02-28-2017, 10:54 AM | #4 |
User
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: near Charlotte NC
Posts: 4,681
Thanks: 1,441
Thanked 4,350 Times in 2,040 Posts
|
Both valid reasons; and both are likely true.
The police strap type would also be cheaper to make, as it eliminates the buckle; JMHO.
__________________
03man(Don Voigt); Luger student and collector. Looking for DWM side plate: 69 ; Dreyse 1907 pistol K.S. Gendarmerie |
The following member says Thank You to DonVoigt for your post: |
02-28-2017, 11:21 AM | #5 |
Patron
LugerForum Patron Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 1,429
Thanks: 67
Thanked 292 Times in 191 Posts
|
I have heard that the military holster was designed primarily to protect the pistol from the mud and grime encountered on the battlefield.
__________________
Regards, Don donmaus1@aol.com Author of History Writ in Steel: German Police Markings 1900-1936 http://www.historywritinsteel.com |
The following member says Thank You to Don M for your post: |
02-28-2017, 12:02 PM | #6 |
Super Moderator
Eternal Lifer LugerForum Patron Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: North of Spokane, WA
Posts: 15,929
Thanks: 2,029
Thanked 4,527 Times in 2,090 Posts
|
I would agree that the strap version is slower to use, but more secure than the police. An army guy is more likely to crawl in mud, run, etc and the police holster can come open easier - while the police is still secure, it is easier to open
But mostly conjecture ... |
The following 2 members says Thank You to Edward Tinker for your post: |
02-28-2017, 08:24 PM | #7 |
Lifer 2X
Lifetime Forum Patron Join Date: May 2005
Location: Somewhere in Montana
Posts: 2,633
Thanks: 3,173
Thanked 2,555 Times in 954 Posts
|
Never question why German's did anything. Because they are Germans I guess. Whatever they were very precise and very skilled. Guess that is one reason why we collect there products. Bill
__________________
Bill Lyon |
The following member says Thank You to wlyon for your post: |
|
|