LugerForum Discussion Forums my profile | register | faq | search
upload photo | donate | calendar

Go Back   LugerForum Discussion Forums > Luger Discussion Forums > New Collectors Forum

Reply
Thread Tools Display Modes
Unread 09-13-2014, 09:06 PM   #1
gatman
User
 
Join Date: Sep 2014
Posts: 6
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Question 1941 Luger

Hi,
New to the forum.

Have a question.

In a recent issue of Shotgun News there was an extensive article on WWII Lugers. At one point the author states that " On 8 April 1940, a Heereswaffnamt directive stipulated that all four digit chamber dates be changed to two-digit dates no later than 1 January 1941." He also states that "the same directive required a change in manufacturer's codes and Mauser's was changed from "42" to "byf". "In addition, it required that "P08" be applied to the left frame panel."

I own a luger and the chamber date is 1941, still four-digits. At the same time it still has the manufacturer code "42" on the toggle, and doesn't have P08 stamped on the side. So somehow, despite the directive, it was produced. All numbers on the pistol match the serial number, so I know its entirely original. I've never seen another one like it. Because of the markings, does this mean the pistol might have some extra value for rarity?
gatman is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 09-13-2014, 09:26 PM   #2
tharpo
Lifer
Lifetime Forum
Patron
 
tharpo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: West Coast, USA
Posts: 543
Thanks: 116
Thanked 382 Times in 157 Posts
Default

Pictures please!
What is the serial number letter suffix on the gun? I do know Mauser was still using the four digit year on their Police Banners in 1941.
tharpo is online now   Reply With Quote
Unread 09-13-2014, 10:31 PM   #3
gatman
User
 
Join Date: Sep 2014
Posts: 6
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

There is no letter suffix on the pistol
gatman is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 09-13-2014, 10:36 PM   #4
gatman
User
 
Join Date: Sep 2014
Posts: 6
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

I have to figure out how to post pictures. May take me awhile as I am leaving on a vacation
gatman is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 09-13-2014, 11:03 PM   #5
tharpo
Lifer
Lifetime Forum
Patron
 
tharpo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: West Coast, USA
Posts: 543
Thanks: 116
Thanked 382 Times in 157 Posts
Default

What stamps does it have on the right side of the receiver? E/63, E/655, or E/135?
tharpo is online now   Reply With Quote
Unread 09-14-2014, 01:10 AM   #6
gatman
User
 
Join Date: Sep 2014
Posts: 6
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

The stamps on the right side are E/655
gatman is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 09-14-2014, 10:28 AM   #7
sheepherder
Lifer
Lifetime Forum
Patron
 
sheepherder's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: ...on the 'ol Erie Canal...
Posts: 8,183
Thanks: 1,400
Thanked 4,442 Times in 2,330 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by gatman View Post
In a recent issue of Shotgun News there was an extensive article on WWII Lugers.
That must have been the Newstand edition. I get the once-a-month edition (as opposed to the three-a-month edition) and there was no Luger article.

Sounds like I'm not missing anything.
__________________
I like my coffee the
way I like my women...
...Cold and bitter...
sheepherder is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 09-14-2014, 02:28 PM   #8
gatman
User
 
Join Date: Sep 2014
Posts: 6
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

That must have been the Newstand edition.

No, it was the April 20, 2014 issue.
gatman is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 09-14-2014, 05:28 PM   #9
rhuff
Patron
LugerForum
Patron
 
rhuff's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Az.
Posts: 2,291
Thanks: 2,709
Thanked 972 Times in 717 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by sheepherder View Post
That must have been the Newstand edition. I get the once-a-month edition (as opposed to the three-a-month edition) and there was no Luger article.

Sounds like I'm not missing anything.


It was one of the three(3) series articles written by Peter Kokalis for Shotgun News.
rhuff is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 09-14-2014, 07:06 PM   #10
sheepherder
Lifer
Lifetime Forum
Patron
 
sheepherder's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: ...on the 'ol Erie Canal...
Posts: 8,183
Thanks: 1,400
Thanked 4,442 Times in 2,330 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by gatman View Post
No, it was the April 20, 2014 issue.
That date indicates the three-a-month edition. As I said, I get only the once-a-month edition. The different editions have different or additional articles. The once-a-month edition which is dated the 10th did not have the Luger article, or any part of it.

Were the 10th, 20th, and 30th editions of that month the three parts of the article???
__________________
I like my coffee the
way I like my women...
...Cold and bitter...
sheepherder is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 09-14-2014, 07:35 PM   #11
gatman
User
 
Join Date: Sep 2014
Posts: 6
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

This is embarrassing. I pulled the gun out of storage to check something and discovered it was dated 1940, not 1941. I should have checked before I posted. Sorry for the confusion.
gatman is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Tags
chamber date, manufacturer code, markings


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:10 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 1998 - 2024, Lugerforum.com