my profile |
register |
faq |
search upload photo | donate | calendar |
02-28-2013, 03:57 PM | #41 |
User
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Canada
Posts: 256
Thanks: 74
Thanked 67 Times in 32 Posts
|
|
03-01-2013, 12:46 AM | #42 |
User
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Calgary AB
Posts: 44
Thanks: 8
Thanked 8 Times in 8 Posts
|
It's called Cadkey 97 R2. And yes, the 97 indicates the year It's very basic as far as CAD programs go, but I find it very easy to use and can quickly generate 2D blueprints with it. Of all the programs I have tried (Including Solidworks, MasterCam and AutoCad), this one is by far the easiest to make 2D drawings in. However it does lack much of the slickness that the aforementioned programs have. I can post it up on Google Drive if anyone wants, can't see posting decade-and-a-half old tech being much of an issue.
|
03-01-2013, 12:57 AM | #43 |
User
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Calgary AB
Posts: 44
Thanks: 8
Thanked 8 Times in 8 Posts
|
Receiver support block:
Made from standard C360 Brass. Nothing special here. the block is made to just barely fit in the minimum specifications of the Luger Receiver. The two guide rails that protrude .055" I later revised to .045" for extra clearance. all dimensions that do not have specific tolerances are +/- .005, everything else as labeled. The most critical dimensions (to me) are the width of the block (.512) and the dimensions and exact location (relative to each other) of the two guide rails. The height (.866) is largely irrelevant, but will end up perfectly flush with the underside of the receiver and the very top of the ears. |
03-01-2013, 01:06 AM | #44 |
User
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Calgary AB
Posts: 44
Thanks: 8
Thanked 8 Times in 8 Posts
|
Making the front sight elevation adjustable is actually really starting to grow on me. Doing something like the Margolin Pistol would be very effective and east to design and manufacture.
Given the substantial sight plane height increase inherent in mounting a sight on the toggle, there should be lots of room to fit the body and elevation assembly into a front sight. It would also mean that the barrel could be easily slimmed, as my front base "ring" could be completely turned off. Hmm hmm hmm. You guys get me thinking! |
03-01-2013, 07:28 AM | #45 |
User
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Marco Island, Florida
Posts: 4,867
Thanks: 1,685
Thanked 1,916 Times in 1,192 Posts
|
Or machine down just the top of the ring, so you still have some mass and the sight assembly and muzzle area looks more balanced, (pretty pistols shoot better).
|
03-01-2013, 10:01 AM | #46 |
Lifer
Lifetime Forum Patron Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: ...on the 'ol Erie Canal...
Posts: 8,183
Thanks: 1,400
Thanked 4,442 Times in 2,330 Posts
|
I would be interested. It has been many years since I did any CAD/CAM work (no longer have access to that machinery) but Cadkey looks much better than the pencil sketches I draw on the backs of envelopes and use as blueprints...
__________________
I like my coffee the way I like my women... ...Cold and bitter... |
03-03-2013, 04:04 AM | #47 |
User
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Calgary AB
Posts: 44
Thanks: 8
Thanked 8 Times in 8 Posts
|
As promised: Cadkey 97 R2. Not as fancy as some of the stuff on the market today, but the program is very robust and, with practice, can achieve some very impressive results. A quick Google search shows there are still a sizeable number of users and a good selection of technical and training resources dedicated to this program. Cool. Hopefully it works well.
I would read the Readmes in there. I think I installed it improperly on my computer, and thus it does not have all the features it should. I could only get the program to work with "Compact Install" on my Vista computer, but full functionality on my XP computer. If any issues crop up, feel free to shoot me a PM and I am more than happy to try and assist. https://docs.google.com/file/d/0B0UE...it?usp=sharing |
The following member says Thank You to Blastattack for your post: |
03-03-2013, 09:37 AM | #48 |
Lifer
Lifetime Forum Patron Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: ...on the 'ol Erie Canal...
Posts: 8,183
Thanks: 1,400
Thanked 4,442 Times in 2,330 Posts
|
Thank You!
80MB... And Google has a disclaimer for this file - Sorry, we are unable to scan this file for viruses. The file exceeds the maximum size that we scan. Download anyway Luckily, I have Hiren’s BootCD which has several popular free anti-virus programs, as well as hundreds of other useful programs & applications (disregard the 'download manager').
__________________
I like my coffee the way I like my women... ...Cold and bitter... |
03-03-2013, 11:19 AM | #49 |
Moderator
Lifetime LugerForum Patron Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Europe
Posts: 5,053
Thanks: 1,036
Thanked 3,988 Times in 1,205 Posts
|
Mauser fixed it by milling the sides of the barrel flat, reducing the overall weight, on their .30 luger sports version in the 1970s.
You can also consider milling horizontal grooves along the barrel exterior, in order to reduce weight. Alternatively, chamber it for .30 Mauser or 7,62 Tokarev |
03-03-2013, 03:48 PM | #50 | ||
User
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Calgary AB
Posts: 44
Thanks: 8
Thanked 8 Times in 8 Posts
|
Quote:
Quote:
|
||
03-03-2013, 05:42 PM | #51 | |
User
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Calgary AB
Posts: 44
Thanks: 8
Thanked 8 Times in 8 Posts
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|