my profile |
register |
faq |
search upload photo | donate | calendar |
07-20-2011, 04:03 AM | #21 |
Patron
LugerForum Patron Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 525
Thanks: 129
Thanked 139 Times in 76 Posts
|
I propose an experiment. Randall Gibson's claim that Krieghoff Lugers had their parts fully finished before fitting is belied by SNs 3249 and 8551, where the sideplate of the former can be fitted on the latter, but not the other way around. With both pistols assembled, there is a nil clearance between the frame and the bottom edge of the sideplate. Neither sideplate manifests any discernible looseness when mounted on the pistol. For the sake of making a comparison, I suggest trying to swap sideplates between two Mauser Parabellums, and reporting their frame fit clearances.
__________________
Michael Zeleny@post.harvard.edu -- http://larvatus.livejournal.com/ -- 7576 Willow Glen Road, Los Angeles, CA 90046 -- 323.363.1860 All of old. Nothing else ever. Ever tried. Ever failed. No matter. Try again. Fail again. Fail better. -- Samuel Beckett |
07-20-2011, 03:57 PM | #22 |
Moderator
Lifetime LugerForum Patron Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Europe
Posts: 5,053
Thanks: 1,036
Thanked 3,988 Times in 1,205 Posts
|
Michael,
I like the approach. I have a few of them here and will make comparisons. I did at the time test the exchangeability of the P08, MP and 06/29 parts and that went quite well. |
07-20-2011, 04:32 PM | #23 |
Patron
LugerForum Patron Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 525
Thanks: 129
Thanked 139 Times in 76 Posts
|
P06/29 71644 and P06/29 77493, both barely used: original sideplates mount easily and fit tight; interchange with difficulty in latching. The cannon of the former fits on the latter; the cannon of the latter is too tight on the former.
P06/29 National Match 59951 heavy 180mm barrel, very tight and presumably unfired, and P06/29 National Match 65721 pencil 200mm barrel, showing some target shooting use: original sideplates mount easily and fit tight; interchange easily with tight fit. The cannon of the former is too tight on the latter; the cannon of the latter fits on the former.
__________________
Michael Zeleny@post.harvard.edu -- http://larvatus.livejournal.com/ -- 7576 Willow Glen Road, Los Angeles, CA 90046 -- 323.363.1860 All of old. Nothing else ever. Ever tried. Ever failed. No matter. Try again. Fail again. Fail better. -- Samuel Beckett |
07-28-2011, 06:38 PM | #24 |
User
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Portland, Oregon
Posts: 3,902
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1,317 Times in 431 Posts
|
Getting back to the original post here, the pistol on eGun is interesting in that it is not one of the N-series pistols. It is quite a conundrum. The 1001 designation on the left frame and the two-digit serial number suggest that this was a production pistol after the N-series serial numbers; there are two or three other examples reported. It is noteworthy that there are no East German inspection stamps or proofs visible on the gun.
--Dwight |
07-29-2011, 07:16 AM | #25 | |
User
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Switzerland
Posts: 32
Thanks: 4
Thanked 7 Times in 3 Posts
|
Quote:
|
|
07-29-2011, 01:05 PM | #26 |
Moderator
Lifetime LugerForum Patron Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Europe
Posts: 5,053
Thanks: 1,036
Thanked 3,988 Times in 1,205 Posts
|
Dwight, good observation. A little theory of mine is that new frames (and even new pistols) were used to replace existing pistols that were damaged beyond repair, copying the dead gun's serial number onto the new one to keep fuss and paperwork to a minimum.
You may say it is far fetched to think that something like that would take place (I did), but after noting several examples of guns that were replaced by Mauser in this way, I think it has some merit. |
07-30-2011, 04:37 AM | #27 |
User
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Maryland
Posts: 358
Thanks: 45
Thanked 125 Times in 59 Posts
|
|
07-30-2011, 05:21 AM | #28 |
Moderator
Lifetime LugerForum Patron Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Europe
Posts: 5,053
Thanks: 1,036
Thanked 3,988 Times in 1,205 Posts
|
I agree that the -A looks a bit weird.
Does the frame serial number have a similar marking, or does it have the classic cursive a.? Here is a similar one, on a first issue P08 that went 'VoPo'. |
07-31-2011, 12:22 AM | #29 |
User
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Maryland
Posts: 358
Thanks: 45
Thanked 125 Times in 59 Posts
|
|
07-31-2011, 08:04 AM | #30 |
Moderator
Lifetime LugerForum Patron Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Europe
Posts: 5,053
Thanks: 1,036
Thanked 3,988 Times in 1,205 Posts
|
Is the -A on the receiver in the white or did you fill it in / enhance it for the photo?
|
07-31-2011, 11:38 AM | #31 |
User
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Maryland
Posts: 358
Thanks: 45
Thanked 125 Times in 59 Posts
|
It's in the white. The others are enhanced for the photo.
|
08-04-2011, 10:57 AM | #32 |
Patron
LugerForum Patron Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 525
Thanks: 129
Thanked 139 Times in 76 Posts
|
Price drop:
http://www.egun.de/market/item.php?id=3393554
__________________
Michael Zeleny@post.harvard.edu -- http://larvatus.livejournal.com/ -- 7576 Willow Glen Road, Los Angeles, CA 90046 -- 323.363.1860 All of old. Nothing else ever. Ever tried. Ever failed. No matter. Try again. Fail again. Fail better. -- Samuel Beckett |
08-04-2011, 03:50 PM | #33 |
Moderator
Lifetime LugerForum Patron Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Europe
Posts: 5,053
Thanks: 1,036
Thanked 3,988 Times in 1,205 Posts
|
Price drop?
Wilhelm, since the -A is in the white, I expect that it was done in recent days. I think your assumption that it was done to make it a 'unique' number is the correct one. Nice crown/crown U markings. |
08-04-2011, 04:52 PM | #34 |
Patron
LugerForum Patron Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 525
Thanks: 129
Thanked 139 Times in 76 Posts
|
From 4,000 to 2,800 Euros. If it's an arithmetical progression, I'll bid on the fourth go-around.
__________________
Michael Zeleny@post.harvard.edu -- http://larvatus.livejournal.com/ -- 7576 Willow Glen Road, Los Angeles, CA 90046 -- 323.363.1860 All of old. Nothing else ever. Ever tried. Ever failed. No matter. Try again. Fail again. Fail better. -- Samuel Beckett |
08-04-2011, 04:57 PM | #35 |
Moderator
Lifetime LugerForum Patron Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Europe
Posts: 5,053
Thanks: 1,036
Thanked 3,988 Times in 1,205 Posts
|
LOL, I missed the first one
|
08-07-2011, 12:21 PM | #36 |
Moderator
Lifetime LugerForum Patron Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Europe
Posts: 5,053
Thanks: 1,036
Thanked 3,988 Times in 1,205 Posts
|
Anyway, I know the sucker who bought the #72 DDR luger, so I'll report back when it gets here.
|
08-08-2011, 01:54 PM | #37 |
User
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: W Central FL
Posts: 98
Thanks: 12
Thanked 20 Times in 11 Posts
|
MZ,
Why such sour grapes on '70s Parabellums? I have two and other than crappy mags (toss 'em) and clunky grips they shoot as good as my other lugers. And yes, the blueing is glossy not matte but this isn't a military pistol. They are what they are and most people who own them seem to be happy with their acquisition. MR
__________________
Tempus edax rerum |
08-09-2011, 11:36 AM | #38 |
Patron
LugerForum Patron Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: POB 398 St.Charles,MO. 63302
Posts: 5,089
Thanks: 6
Thanked 736 Times in 483 Posts
|
Note to shooter: I currently have a couple of nice DDR reworked WW2 PO8 listed in the For Sale section. TH
|
|
|