my profile |
register |
faq |
search upload photo | donate | calendar |
12-12-2010, 08:41 PM | #1 |
Super Moderator - Patron
LugerForum Life Patron Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Eastern North Carolina, USA
Posts: 3,907
Thanks: 1,374
Thanked 3,108 Times in 1,509 Posts
|
What kind of revisionist history is this?
Here are the current 2nd Amendment thoughts of one of our supreme court justices:
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2010...ons-guns/print What kind of revisionist thinking leads to this kind of jurisprudence? The last paragraph clearly suggests that we violate state and possibly federal laws... Marc
__________________
Igitur si vis pacem, para bellum - - Therefore if you want peace, prepare for war. |
12-12-2010, 09:05 PM | #2 |
User
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Lakeland, Fl.
Posts: 514
Thanks: 349
Thanked 101 Times in 52 Posts
|
Thank goodness the Republicans will have the House soon. Given another 2 more years of all Democrat's ruling the roost, after health care, Gay rights,ect. they would have gotten around to firearms. The only check would be the Surpreme Court.
|
12-12-2010, 09:39 PM | #3 |
User
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: South Florida
Posts: 101
Thanks: 4
Thanked 4 Times in 4 Posts
|
Breyer is a hermit; a weirdo. G.H.W. Bush should never have appointed him in the first place.
The right of self defense is older than government. |
Tags |
supreme court breyer |
|
|