my profile |
register |
faq |
search upload photo | donate | calendar |
09-20-2010, 01:57 PM | #1 |
New User
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 2
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
DWM Commercial Luger Fraktur ID
I have what appears to be a commercial DWM luger with SN 20xx and a fraktur letter I can't identify well (see attached photo). The pistol has what looks to be a 3 1/4" barrel, the "Crown over N" stamp on the left receiver and left toggle, and the "Germany" stamp on the right receiver just above the grip. Grips are checkered wood. All numbers seem to match except on the clip. There is a lanyard loop on the rear of the receiver and the backstrap has an attachment lug for a removable stock. DWM is on the top of the toggle in script. Can anyone ID the fraktur letter from my attached photo and can you tell me the date of manufacture and anything else of interest about this pistol?
|
09-20-2010, 02:17 PM | #2 |
RIP
Patron LugerForum Patron Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Hot & Dry PHX, AZ
Posts: 2,078
Thanks: 24
Thanked 163 Times in 87 Posts
|
Hello Lowe! The script suffix letter is a "P".
Hope this helps a little. |
09-21-2010, 01:38 AM | #3 |
User
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Louisiana
Posts: 1,237
Thanks: 183
Thanked 281 Times in 162 Posts
|
Hi Steve,
Your Luger is classified as an Alphabet DWM Commercial (formerly known as a 1920 commecial). 20xxp was made in 1926 by DWM. It was produced for the US civilian market and export stamped "Germany" according to US law. The barrel should be 30 cal/7.65mm and 3 7/8'' long, measured from the muzzle to the breech face.
__________________
Mike C. |
09-21-2010, 10:19 AM | #4 |
New User
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 2
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Thanks for all the info. It is a great help. The Luger is in great shape (probably 70 to 90%). I don't plan to sell, but any idea of the approximate value of the pistol?
|
09-21-2010, 11:35 AM | #5 |
Super Moderator - Patron
LugerForum Life Patron Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Eastern North Carolina, USA
Posts: 3,909
Thanks: 1,374
Thanked 3,110 Times in 1,510 Posts
|
The DWM Alphabet commercial Lugers are relatively common, and don't have the collector appeal that military proofed guns do.
Sounds like your Luger hasn't been "messed with" and is in the original factory configuration and finish. The magazines for these were not normally numbered. I paid $675 recently for one in original factory finish, with original magazine and in very good condition. Marc
__________________
Igitur si vis pacem, para bellum - - Therefore if you want peace, prepare for war. |
09-23-2010, 09:31 PM | #6 |
User
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Vermont
Posts: 45
Thanks: 1
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
|
value of 30 cal gun
I paid 900 for mine. I routinely see these advertised for well over $1000, but they don't seem to selling at that level. Check the Simpson Ltd. web sight; there are pages of commercials at very high prices.
|
09-24-2010, 07:26 AM | #7 |
User
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Malta
Posts: 570
Thanks: 74
Thanked 12 Times in 12 Posts
|
Letter suffix P
Without hijacking Lowe210 thread, I need some advice on my 41-42 Luger letter suffix.
My Luger has a letter suffix that at first it looks like an N, but looking through the book The Mauser Parabellum 1930-1946, the letter N suffix of the 41-42 Luger is different from mine, on my Luger it looks like a P, but with a short leg or stem. In the photo I included two inserts of the letter N on the left and the letter P on the right for comparison. Could it be it is that way because it was stamped on the curve of the front frame? Thanks for any suggestions. Alf.
__________________
I prefer a Luger |
09-24-2010, 08:28 AM | #8 |
User
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Marco Island, Florida
Posts: 4,867
Thanks: 1,685
Thanked 1,916 Times in 1,192 Posts
|
I agree that it is a "P" that got cut short by the curve in the metal
|
09-24-2010, 08:33 AM | #9 | |
User
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Malta
Posts: 570
Thanks: 74
Thanked 12 Times in 12 Posts
|
Quote:
Alf.
__________________
I prefer a Luger |
|
09-24-2010, 10:48 AM | #10 |
RIP
Patron LugerForum Patron Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Hot & Dry PHX, AZ
Posts: 2,078
Thanks: 24
Thanked 163 Times in 87 Posts
|
There are several configurations of the Mauser suffix letters. The 8216 (?) you show, is correct for a "N" suffix. The "N" shown in the small picture would be found on 1936 or 1938 Lugers.
While a very few 41 Code 42 Lugers are reported in the P-Block, the bulk are frpm the N-Block. |
09-24-2010, 12:01 PM | #11 |
User
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Malta
Posts: 570
Thanks: 74
Thanked 12 Times in 12 Posts
|
Frank, the P block of the 41-42 luger 500 are reported.
The letter suffix on this Luger is more a P than an-N from the letters photos provided, ....I think. It seems that the P suffix was divided by the 41-42 and the 41-byf Lugers. Alf.
__________________
I prefer a Luger |
09-24-2010, 04:18 PM | #12 |
RIP
Patron LugerForum Patron Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Hot & Dry PHX, AZ
Posts: 2,078
Thanks: 24
Thanked 163 Times in 87 Posts
|
Alf, the 41/42 Lugers were produced during the month of January 1941. The production was pretty well completed at about 5000o.
If you are looking at the Hallock/Kant Book on suffix nomenclature, there are a number of errors. Of course, you can believe what you wish, but I can't believe there were 500 41/42 Lugers in the P-Block. |
09-25-2010, 03:42 AM | #13 |
User
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Malta
Posts: 570
Thanks: 74
Thanked 12 Times in 12 Posts
|
Frank, What you say may be true, myself found a couple of issues that I do not agree about them.
Now back to my Luger, if the letter stamps that were stamped during the 41-42 Luger production were what the book display, then I am sure that the letter suffix on this Luger is not an N, is more like the P with a short stem. For sure is, that the frame of this Luger is the late Mauser frame, because it has the P08 mark on the left side. The gun is all matching, the grips are marked SE655 on both. I am sure that this Luger is correct, but if it is in the N or P that is what I am trying to find out. Thanks for your output. Alf.
__________________
I prefer a Luger |
09-25-2010, 04:11 AM | #14 |
User
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Louisiana
Posts: 1,237
Thanks: 183
Thanked 281 Times in 162 Posts
|
Alf,
I beleive it is 8216n. The vertical line of a 'p' suffix is taller than the line on a 'n'. Also the bottom of the line is squared off and ends abrubtly. If it were an impartial stamp because of the curve, the line would fade out. Just my 2 cents.
__________________
Mike C. |
09-25-2010, 06:20 AM | #15 | |
User
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Malta
Posts: 570
Thanks: 74
Thanked 12 Times in 12 Posts
|
Quote:
Could it be there is another N stamped that was used during that year. Alf.
__________________
I prefer a Luger |
|
|
|