my profile |
register |
faq |
search upload photo | donate | calendar |
10-11-2009, 12:07 AM | #1 |
New User
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 3
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Stainless Steel Lugers
Mitchel Arms, I think, made a stainless steel luger years ago. Sometimes you see a company selling these new on GunsAmerica. Is this firm still in business?
|
10-11-2009, 12:53 AM | #2 |
RIP
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Ca.
Posts: 2,141
Thanks: 8
Thanked 89 Times in 54 Posts
|
Mitchell arms are no longer in business, parts are impossible to get, a broken gun will be un-repairable......avoid Mitchell Lugers......welcome.
|
10-11-2009, 10:05 AM | #3 |
User
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: South Florida
Posts: 789
Thanks: 0
Thanked 84 Times in 34 Posts
|
The steel is too soft, anyone who has worked on these can tell you that.
They make nice paper weights or just sitting in the safe looking purdy Jim
__________________
The "truth" is a matter of Perception |
10-11-2009, 10:06 AM | #4 | |
Lifer
Lifetime Forum Patron Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: ...on the 'ol Erie Canal...
Posts: 8,182
Thanks: 1,400
Thanked 4,442 Times in 2,330 Posts
|
Quote:
Isn't that a bit extreme??? If SS Mitchell was made from Luger specs, shouldn't a "real" Luger part be adaptable??? |
|
10-11-2009, 10:21 AM | #5 |
RIP
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Ca.
Posts: 2,141
Thanks: 8
Thanked 89 Times in 54 Posts
|
I run a full time gun smith business, I have two forum Mitchell Lugers here in need of parts for repair and Mitchell will not send the parts for months now, despite saying they would, "real" Luger parts are not interchangable and one customer already got burned trying that route.....you have been warned, is that "extreme".....you want your investment sitting here with the other 2 ?
|
10-11-2009, 10:29 AM | #6 |
User
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: South Florida
Posts: 789
Thanks: 0
Thanked 84 Times in 34 Posts
|
Luger parts are not interchangeable with the Mitchell Lugers........I will attest to that.
Its not extreme....just educating the consumer on the facts and they can make their own choices. (Hmm...thought thats what this forum is about or at least it has for the past 6 years or so) Jim
__________________
The "truth" is a matter of Perception |
10-11-2009, 10:40 AM | #7 |
User
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: US
Posts: 3,843
Thanks: 132
Thanked 729 Times in 438 Posts
|
Simpson has one listed. Amazingly Mitchell's list price is higher than nice DWM 1920 Commercial. Upside down world? I knew some guys loving white guns. Getting Mitchell saves refinishing effort and cost.
|
10-11-2009, 11:00 AM | #8 |
New User
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 3
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Wasn't the gun who owned Mitchell also the last owner of High Standard?
|
10-11-2009, 11:10 AM | #9 | ||
Lifer
Lifetime Forum Patron Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: ...on the 'ol Erie Canal...
Posts: 8,182
Thanks: 1,400
Thanked 4,442 Times in 2,330 Posts
|
Quote:
My comment was based on my experience with gunsmiths; people who can machine pretty much anything out of a chunk of 4140 steel and heat treat/temper it in their forge and come up with a part you couldn't tell from original... Sadly, that was years ago...The only shops left hereabouts that will even work on your weapon now are parts changers, not smiths... I suppose that is partly due to product liability...and time involved not being cost-effective... So you're saying that Luger parts won't fit??? That's good to know...(I thought I had read (when they first came out) that they were made from original prints/specs)... Quote:
I post on about a dozen Forums; some have a rule about "no chatting" in the Classifieds...I thought this was one of them... |
||
10-11-2009, 11:48 AM | #10 | |
Super Moderator
Eternal Lifer LugerForum Patron Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: North of Spokane, WA
Posts: 15,927
Thanks: 2,026
Thanked 4,524 Times in 2,090 Posts
|
Quote:
I have moved it to a new area....
__________________
Edward Tinker ************ Co-Author of Police Lugers - Co-Author of Simson Lugers Author of Veteran Bring Backs Vol I, Vol II, Vol III and Vol IV |
|
10-11-2009, 11:48 AM | #11 |
User
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: US
Posts: 3,843
Thanks: 132
Thanked 729 Times in 438 Posts
|
Heard two stories regarding parts interexchangability. The first one was printed on a Gun Digest book, the writer said "yes", and showed a few pictures with an old gun with Mitchell side plates, trigger etc. The second ... I forgot the source, said "no", because Mitchell used English size toolset in manufacturing and German ones used Metrics.
=== Edit: Also, the book article writer insisted that Mitchell was more accurate in range. But, he also admitted that he had never shot a collector German Parabellum. I would think comparing a brand new Mitchell with a mismatched old Luger in fair condition was a little bit unfair and misleading. |
10-11-2009, 02:19 PM | #12 |
User
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: So Cal
Posts: 459
Thanks: 774
Thanked 143 Times in 87 Posts
|
Let me toss my 2 cents in
I have owned and shot a stainless steel Mitchell for many years. I have had one part fall off,it was the sear spring.Could never find it, so I ordered a replacement spring from Numrich. It didn't fit very well,so I had to grind it slightly to fit. Interesting, I have never tried to interchange parts on it from a German luger. Maybe I should try it in the interest of science. I do know the German mags will not work in it,but the Mitchell mags work in German guns??? My experience with shooting it? It is a finicky gun. Mine likes 124 grain Magtech ammo and the gun must be well lubricated with stainless grease.It is also sensitive to mags.I have a few of the original Mitchell mags and only a couple of them will feed reliably. I have also noticed that you need to be very careful in how you load the mags.Any even very slightly crooked ammo and you get jams. The original Mitchell loading tool is a joke,but it looks nice! All that being said,when the cosmos is aligned correctly, the gun is really fun to shoot. It is very accurate and is a real crowd pleaser at the range.I never have to worry about the finish and I can clean it whenever I get around to it I did read somewhere that the early ones where made of soft metal and the frame rails would bend and then jam the recoil movement.I read that and quickly miked mine,no issues. Just thought I would share my experience,in the hope of helping others. Now if could just find one the original Mitchell holsters!
__________________
"I think,therefore I own guns" |
10-11-2009, 04:45 PM | #13 |
New User
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 3
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Decades ago I bought one. All that I remember is that it was a wonderful machine pistol. As long as the trigger was depressed the gun fired in full automatic. Returned it for repair but I don't remember what happened after that. In retrospect I wish that I had kept it as it was. Probably highly illegal but it was a lot of fun!
|
10-11-2009, 05:24 PM | #14 | |
Lifer
Lifetime Forum Patron Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: ...on the 'ol Erie Canal...
Posts: 8,182
Thanks: 1,400
Thanked 4,442 Times in 2,330 Posts
|
Quote:
Not really much fun...unless you count watching the shells arc across the sky, all in a nice lazy crescent... Traded it in for a S&W Mod 41 to a smith in Curriers NY...Don't recall if he ever figured it out or not... |
|
10-11-2009, 07:30 PM | #15 |
User
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Elizabethtown, KY
Posts: 78
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
|
I read somewhere that any luger made other than DWM is a cheap copy.
I have a late Stoeger Navy (6 in) that works just fine. Mine prefers 115gr Winchesters and will jam with 124gr Magtechs. I have no problem with disassembly or assembly. Very balanced, accurate, but a little heavy. They seem to be a bit thicker and not quite so ergonomic as a classic Luger, but I do have small hands. AIMCO actually made both the Stoeger and the Mitchell. There was a problem with the early Mitchell models with the metallurgy. They were too soft and would eventually beat themselves to death. The problem was supposed to have been corrected while still under the Mitchell name. It’s a bit like the 1903 Springfield stigma, which is based on truth, but all 1903’s are considered safe after the problem was corrected. You'll still hear some oldtimer telling you the 03 reciever will blow up in your face. You can still get replacement parts through Aimco but they are expensive and getting through to them a pain in the butt. The magazines and parts are not interchangeable with other lugers. As far as their cost, you just don’t see many and that drives the price up. I take mine to the range and it turns heads. It is beautiful. If I had an offer to trade it for a navy DWM ? It would be gone in a heart beat. Shooting wise I do prefer my S/42 over it,,,,,,,, just feels better. The only preference I have to stainless is my black powder deer rifle, makes cleaning soooo much easier. |
10-12-2009, 08:56 AM | #16 |
User
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Arkansas
Posts: 135
Thanks: 0
Thanked 4 Times in 4 Posts
|
Does any one know when Mitchell corrected the soft metal problem. I ask, because I have a 1992 Mitchell and right now it is a great shooter.
It seems with Mitchell Lugers it is either a good one or a bad one. Mine has always been good and I am sad for the people who got bad ones.
__________________
W David |
10-12-2009, 08:07 PM | #17 |
User
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: So Cal
Posts: 459
Thanks: 774
Thanked 143 Times in 87 Posts
|
In a home version of "Mythbusters" I tried to interchange German made luger parts with parts from my stainless Mitchell.
As you learned gents have reported,the German parts will not fit on a Mitchell Luger!: The fit is really close,but no cigar. Can you let me know what parts seem to fail on this gun? Maybe if I order the parts now,I will get them in time if something breaks?
__________________
"I think,therefore I own guns" |
10-12-2009, 09:40 PM | #18 |
Lifer X5
Lifetime Forum Patron Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: texas
Posts: 708
Thanks: 87
Thanked 522 Times in 201 Posts
|
please post up a spec on the good ones to buy...
they sound like a nice addition, but experience would make the purchase more logical...thanks, tom
|
10-15-2009, 07:13 PM | #19 |
User
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Nashville, Tennessee area
Posts: 263
Thanks: 5
Thanked 3 Times in 3 Posts
|
I had three STOEGER stainless Aimco Lugers, and all three of them had problems. The metal was not hardened properly, you could see the toggle battering on the frame rails which were indented at the impact point and mushed out on the sides. The parts were similar but not to the exact fit, nowhere as close as even Erfurt parts are to DWM. None of the three guns would shoot two rounds in succession without stovepipe jams etc. Their magazines are completely different from Luger magazines.
Besides that, I was put off by the wavy buffing and melted edges everywhere. Even a beater German P08 beats a Texas stainless copy. If you have to have a white metal Luger, take an old mismatched and badly refinished German Luger, and strip it (with chemicals). Just keep it oily. |
|
|