LugerForum Discussion Forums my profile | register | faq | search
upload photo | donate | calendar

Go Back   LugerForum Discussion Forums > Luger Discussion Forums > Lugerforum Archive

 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
Unread 09-20-2001, 12:37 AM   #1
Big Norm
RIP
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: SE Michigan
Posts: 1,864
Thanks: 1
Thanked 6 Times in 5 Posts
Default 1914 CHAMBER DATED DWM ARTILLERY

I am going to throw out a question for the forums discussion. A couple of weeks ago I was at a Michigan gunshow and I had a dealer show me a chamber dated 1914 DWM artillery Luger. I got excited and looked at it. But then I noticed that the serial number was #75 (no small cap). I handed the gun back to the dealer and told him it was a fake. He looked stunned. So I told him that according to Jan Stills book, the appropriate serial number range for that gun is 294 through 1995a. He wanted to argue with me but he didn't. This guy is an experienced gun dealer and collector who was holding the gun for another dealer who is not a collector, just a merchandizer. So I couldn't examine the gun as closely as I would like to. But I suspect that the gun will soon be on the market as an original chamber dated 1914 DWM artiller with a hefty price tag.


But then while at last weeks OGCA meeting in Cleveland I had a talk with Mr Simpson of Simpson LTD. We had a gentlemens argument over the gun. His point was that Jan Still only listed the serial numbers of the Lugers that he had seen and personally verified. Jan Still just had not seen this gun so he did not include it in his serial range. He said that there are no records of the actual serial number range. He said that I was misreading Stills.


Mr Simpson got stubborn on his point and I got equally stubborn on my point that if a Luger did not fall within Jan Stills serial number range then I would consider it a counterfeit and not consider its purchase. I would consider anybody who sold that gun as an original would be committing fraud.


From previous discussions on this forum I have been lead to believe that Jan Stills is a perfectionist. If that is so, then I do not believe that he would publish a haphazard list of serial numbers without doing some research on the matter first.


Now I know that there are, if fact, a number of knowledgable Lugerheads on this forum. So I want to throw out the question of who is correct?

Big Norm



Big Norm is offline  
 

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:23 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 1998 - 2026, Lugerforum.com