![]() |
my profile |
register |
faq |
search upload photo | donate | calendar |
![]() |
#41 |
User
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 29
Thanks: 9
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
![]()
All,
Why is using Pecard a "Bad Mistake? Wayne |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#42 |
Moderator
2010 LugerForum Patron Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Santa Teresa New Mexico just outside of the West Texas town of El Paso
Posts: 7,034
Thanks: 1,106
Thanked 5,238 Times in 1,718 Posts
|
![]()
It is a petroleum product designed for waterproofing. It is great for field boots, but will eventually breakdown the fibers of the leather. No big deal if you have a pair of boots that may only be in use 5 or 10 years max, but a historical holster hopefully will be around a lot longer than that. As Jerry said "Picards is ghastly waxy sticky goo and I would never ruin my vintage leather with this petroleum product."
__________________
If it's made after 1918...it's a reproduction |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|