For Kohaku, some evidence

Snakeman · 12-27-2005, 10:23 PM

Hi Karl,
Yes it was, but if you go back even earlier (about turn of the century), you will find that the shooting position was even more radical- the upper and lower parts of the shooting arm were at about a 90 degree angle from each other (seen the photos but donÃ?Â´t have anything to post, sorry). This brought the sights much closer to the face than modern competetive target shooting technic does (extended arm)- maybe this is why the sight formation was deemed acceptable by the powers in being at the time.

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Switch to Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Threaded Mode

12-27-2005, 10:23 PM	#10
Snakeman User Join Date: Nov 2005 Location: Sweden Posts: 31 Thanks: 0 Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts	Hi Karl, Yes it was, but if you go back even earlier (about turn of the century), you will find that the shooting position was even more radical- the upper and lower parts of the shooting arm were at about a 90 degree angle from each other (seen the photos but donÃ?Â´t have anything to post, sorry). This brought the sights much closer to the face than modern competetive target shooting technic does (extended arm)- maybe this is why the sight formation was deemed acceptable by the powers in being at the time.