![]() |
my profile |
register |
faq |
search upload photo | donate | calendar |
|
|
|
|
#1 |
|
User
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Orygun
Posts: 4,243
Thanks: 118
Thanked 245 Times in 150 Posts
|
I don't think there is anything wrong with restoring a luger that in this condition. I see it as reconditioning or preserving a piece of history.
If a Luger is in bad condition, do to indifferent neglect, and can be restored. I believe it should be. Nothing is gained by leaving it alone. And I do believe that something is definitely lost in doing so. On the other hand, if the pistol is in good condition (80%+) and just shows honest use and has been cared for. I feel that light wear or patina is part of that history. And should be left as is. And should'nt be restored or refinished. Just because the owner wants a pretty gun. This is a 1914 DWM that I bought a year ago. It has been neglected over the years. And needed to be preserved. It has been in the hands of Ted Green for awhile. Can't wait to see it. ![]() Ron
__________________
I Still Need DWM side plate #49... if anyone runs across a nice one. What ~Rudyard Kipling~ said... |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|