LugerForum Discussion Forums my profile | register | faq | search
upload photo | donate | calendar

Go Back   LugerForum Discussion Forums > Luger Discussion Forums > Early Lugers (1900-1906)

 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
Unread 08-16-2005, 06:52 AM   #11
surlydog
User
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: south carolina
Posts: 14
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

Thats funny Jan, I just re=read it and seem to have done exactly that..No paper trail..GL NOT dbl. strike,and first impressions...well is that how does one answer that.. i suggest you make a quick $500 and PROVE this gun is not as stated..my first impression is :that if you discovered this gun it would be hailed as a great find on your part...why is someone like you not instead, saying hmm, what can i contribute to help document this piece,who might i know that has a prototype to compare die stamps, thats a reasonable idea..This is the same trend I saw on your forum, from information (facts) sharing to negitivity..Unless you can offer spacifics " this is not right for period . ect.) why support innuendo
__________________
Arizona transplant to South Carolina
surlydog is offline   Reply With Quote
 

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:19 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 1998 - 2025, Lugerforum.com