Top 10 KÃ?Â¼ Theories

MP38 · 03-04-2005, 11:47 PM

John,

I totally agree with you! Except for your first part. I never in no way tried to tie the "LZA" marking to Krieghoff at all! In fact, I did just the opposite! (please re-read thread again carefully!!!)I showed that it was not a Krieghoff marking, as many previous books have claimed!

Other than that, I agree with just about everything you said. We have no concrete proof, and probably never will. However, this theory is the only one I have heard that cannot be totally disproven either!

If you don't agree with the theory, then let's just agree to dis-agree and leave it at that.

BTW-you missed the email the Mr. Brock sent to me concerning the depot at Kustrin. That is why you did not see it in the thread. If you would like to contact him about it, by all means feel free to do so.
Matt

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Switch to Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Threaded Mode

03-04-2005, 11:47 PM	#24
MP38 User Join Date: Mar 2005 Location: Wisconsin Posts: 464 Thanks: 36 Thanked 113 Times in 60 Posts	John, I totally agree with you! Except for your first part. I never in no way tried to tie the "LZA" marking to Krieghoff at all! In fact, I did just the opposite! (please re-read thread again carefully!!!)I showed that it was not a Krieghoff marking, as many previous books have claimed! Other than that, I agree with just about everything you said. We have no concrete proof, and probably never will. However, this theory is the only one I have heard that cannot be totally disproven either! If you don't agree with the theory, then let's just agree to dis-agree and leave it at that. BTW-you missed the email the Mr. Brock sent to me concerning the depot at Kustrin. That is why you did not see it in the thread. If you would like to contact him about it, by all means feel free to do so. Matt