![]() |
my profile |
register |
faq |
search upload photo | donate | calendar |
![]() |
#1 |
User
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Montreal, Quebec
Posts: 584
Thanks: 0
Thanked 3 Times in 3 Posts
|
![]()
I have recently located ( yet unseen ) a Red 9 with the barrel trimmed to 3.9 in. as stated in the Versailles Treaty. Is there any specific proofmarks related to that 1920 Rework?, aside from the Imperial proofs?
THX Mark <img border="0" title="" alt="[Wink]" src="wink.gif" /> |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
RIP
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Dc 'burbs in Virginia
Posts: 2,482
Thanks: 0
Thanked 16 Times in 10 Posts
|
![]()
Hi Mark,
There is no specific proofmark that is applicable to the Versailles circumcision guns, but Simpson re-work proofs seem to be quite common. Tom A. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
User
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Montreal, Quebec
Posts: 584
Thanks: 0
Thanked 3 Times in 3 Posts
|
![]()
Hello Tom,
Thanks for the information. I'll check things out & keep you posted if a deal is made... Mark |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
User
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Germany
Posts: 228
Thanks: 1
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
![]()
How is the rear sight on that "red nine" fixed ore still with the 500 meters adjustment?
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|