1915 Luger Unit Marking

Doubs · 10-01-2002, 05:12 PM

Jan, while I agree with your interpretation of the markings, aren't they well outside of the approved sequence? Wouldn't it be more correct if it read: "R.J.R.65.M.G.K.2.6."?

In past correspondence with Rheinhardt Kornmayer, he stated that Imperial markings often deviated from the regulations. It seems to me that the markings on this Luger are not IAW the regs. (I'm at work and don't have my books handy so I may be all wet but I don't think I am.)

Anyway, I'm just curious as to your thoughts on this.

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Switch to Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Threaded Mode

10-01-2002, 05:12 PM	#4
Doubs User Join Date: Jun 2002 Location: Byron, Georgia Posts: 1,742 Thanks: 826 Thanked 1,788 Times in 590 Posts	Jan, while I agree with your interpretation of the markings, aren't they well outside of the approved sequence? Wouldn't it be more correct if it read: "R.J.R.65.M.G.K.2.6."? In past correspondence with Rheinhardt Kornmayer, he stated that Imperial markings often deviated from the regulations. It seems to me that the markings on this Luger are not IAW the regs. (I'm at work and don't have my books handy so I may be all wet but I don't think I am.) Anyway, I'm just curious as to your thoughts on this.