1906 Navy

Navy · 09-21-2004, 05:43 PM

Norm, Norm, Norm...

My suggested change in taxonomy is motivated by several facts:

1. The current collector-sprache is not what the German Navy used as nomenclature;
2. The current collector-sprache is incomplete;
3. The current collector-sprache does not reflect what we know from existing documents actually happened;
4. The current collector-sprache is inconsistent with the weapons acquisition process

My suggested changes to the taxonomy was in no way intended to minimize or eliminate the need for ancillary and additional information such as chamber dates and the other stuff we wacked-out Looger nutz get to drooling about. Clearly, amplifying information is ALWAYS desirable.

And finally, my modest suggestion applies only to Imperial Navy pistols.

Cheers,

Tom

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Switch to Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Threaded Mode

09-21-2004, 05:43 PM	#14
Navy RIP Join Date: Jun 2002 Location: Dc 'burbs in Virginia Posts: 2,482 Thanks: 0 Thanked 16 Times in 10 Posts	Norm, Norm, Norm... My suggested change in taxonomy is motivated by several facts: 1. The current collector-sprache is not what the German Navy used as nomenclature; 2. The current collector-sprache is incomplete; 3. The current collector-sprache does not reflect what we know from existing documents actually happened; 4. The current collector-sprache is inconsistent with the weapons acquisition process My suggested changes to the taxonomy was in no way intended to minimize or eliminate the need for ancillary and additional information such as chamber dates and the other stuff we wacked-out Looger nutz get to drooling about. Clearly, amplifying information is ALWAYS desirable. And finally, my modest suggestion applies only to Imperial Navy pistols. Cheers, Tom