![]() |
my profile |
register |
faq |
search upload photo | donate | calendar |
![]() |
#22 |
User
Join Date: May 2003
Posts: 184
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
|
![]()
In other words, you actually know no more about this than I do, and you apparently know less about gun production technques. But you are quick to take as gospel books written by people who were not there, and never bothered to learn anything about how guns are made.
I have actually looked at absolutely original Lugers and in many cases the receiver and barrel marks were obviously not made at the same time with the same tool, as would be the case under your theory. I am ending this silly thread. It is like trying to convince any true believer that a tenet of his faith might not be correct. You have developed a concept of Luger manufacture that makes no sense, would be extremely inefficient, and would be totally unnecessary. Jim |
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|