LugerForum Discussion Forums my profile | register | faq | search
upload photo | donate | calendar

Go Back   LugerForum Discussion Forums > General Discussion Forums > General Discussions

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Unread 08-26-2003, 09:42 PM   #1
Jim Keenan
User
 
Join Date: May 2003
Posts: 184
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Post

We should also be careful about taking as gospel the theories of writers who know nothing about gun production or machine shop work.

Saxman, you are correct in that the assembler needed only to align the draw lines when installing the barrel. But that was done on the first, and only, installation of the barrel. That process, with its critical need for a proper crush fit, was not repeated.

And if each barrel was fitted to a receiver to be marked, how were spare barrels marked (and they are)? Even if each was fully installed, how would the anyone know that a barrel installed on one receiver would be OK in another receiver made at another time in another factory? Sorry, it won't wash.

The barrel shoulder and threads were fully machined, the draw line was marked using the gauge, and the rear of the barrel faced off. Then the sight base was machined and the extractor cut made by aligning on the draw line. The chamber was cut and the barrel was then complete, ready for installation. The proper "draw" insured correct headspace.

The entire process, albeit with another gun, is described, with pictures, in United States Rifles and Machineguns by Colvin and Viall. Every other factory did it the same way.

Jim
Jim Keenan is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:16 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 1998 - 2025, Lugerforum.com