LugerForum Discussion Forums my profile | register | faq | search
upload photo | donate | calendar

Go Back   LugerForum Discussion Forums > General Discussion Forums > General Discussions

 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
Unread 03-10-2003, 10:35 AM   #34
Dwight Gruber
User
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Portland, Oregon
Posts: 3,908
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1,330 Times in 435 Posts
Post

Corresponding questions need to be answered about authorized rebarrelling practices. At what level was barrel removal and replacement accomplished--field repair level? armory? some intermediate repair depot? The power-proofing procedures presented in G�¶rtz & Bryans (p.119) for replaced barrels imply that this was an armory-level repair. Were replaced barrels stamped with serial numbers to match the weapon? Are there regulations extant which detail these specifications?

The example below is a 1936 S/42, a suspected re-barrel. Evidence is beginning to appear which calls into question such suspicions based solely on witness marks as pictured. What other visible characteristics might support it as authentic or rebarrel? I certainly wonder about the way the serial number is stamped. The right side of the barrel does bear the same Mauser acceptance eagle (Costanzo, p.114, mark 176) as the receiver.

--Dwight



Dwight Gruber is offline   Reply With Quote
 

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:33 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 1998 - 2025, Lugerforum.com