LugerForum Discussion Forums my profile | register | faq | search
upload photo | donate | calendar

Go Back   LugerForum Discussion Forums > General Discussion Forums > General Discussions

 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
Unread 10-07-2002, 09:22 PM   #7
wterrell
User
 
wterrell's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Colorado
Posts: 1,096
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Post

Tom A,
These men are SO sharp that I think a few of their remarks on this very pistol are worth revisiting.

From Thor:
[quote]posted 07-23-2002
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
A parts gun, Simson chambered would be around 1925 vintage and rust blued. Barrel appears salt blued as does EJECTOR which is not right either for a Simson. Some parts are blued that should be strawed, some are strawed that should be blued. A little high for a parts gun, but not too bad!
The number 1 markings are a little funny given that the parts are from different guns. Thor
-------------------- <hr></blockquote>


From max2cam:
[quote] posted 07-24-2002
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On the first photo of that gun notice the apparent tool marks on the milled out flat behind the toggle cam-ramp area of the frame.
How common is it for this spot on the frame to be perfectly smooth without machine tooling marks and how common for there to be marks there?

My 1938 has some machine tool traces in that area, but I thought earlier guns would not. Or did WWI production guns show more tooling blems as well?

<hr></blockquote>


From Hugh:
[quote] It is common for there to be some circular milling marks in this area. However, on that #1 gun, those look more like "engine-turning" marks rather than milling marks. That "1" looks funny also........ <hr></blockquote>


From tacfoley:
[quote]Dear American Persons - please enlighten this poor old fart sitting on the other side of the wet bit, but don't you have an organisation like the Trading and Advertising standards authority like we do over here in the backward old UK? The seller of this 'faked up' pistol in THIS burg would be seriously done by:
a. the Trading Standards Authority
b. the Gun Trade Association
c. the Home Office

As a result of prosecution under any or all of these organisations, he would, at the very least, lose his licence to trade in Section 1 Firearms - ie those which fire a cartridge, effectively preventing him from any further mis-representation of a live weapon.

I guess it's because there are just so many of 'em out there for you all that one bad apple doesn't even get noticed.......


<hr></blockquote>
__________________
Noli me vocare, ego te vocabo,
wes
--------------------
wterrell is offline   Reply With Quote
 

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:37 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 1998 - 2025, Lugerforum.com